ImageImageImageImage

Position Battles: SG

Moderators: UCFJayBird, UCF, Knightro, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

Which SG gets the most starts in 2023-24?

Gary Harris
25
29%
Jalen Suggs
54
63%
Jett Howard
5
6%
Joe Ingles
2
2%
Caleb Houstan
0
No votes
Kavon Harris
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 86

JBSouthpaw
Analyst
Posts: 3,371
And1: 1,352
Joined: Mar 01, 2011

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#101 » by JBSouthpaw » Thu Jul 20, 2023 11:14 am

pepe1991 wrote:Few things, to not replay to everybody in separate posts:

....

Third. People now want him to play SG mostly because of 3 reasons:
- he looks horrid at PG, position he was drafted to play
- Magic drafted fans shiny new toy at PG so rooting for him at SG clears competition for Black
- portion of fans are Fultz fans so rooting for Suggs to play SG clears competition


.....


On your last 2 points here, I'd say Suggs got beat out at back up PG by Cole. Black is just another layer.
I think people want to see Suggs succeed, which is why SG spot looks like the best place for him.
There are a few players I can think of that shot poorly that were starters (Tony Allen, Rondo), for me the issue is you can't have someone shoot so bad in a starting 5 of average to below average shooters.
p0peye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,852
And1: 3,364
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#102 » by p0peye » Thu Jul 20, 2023 11:32 am

Cole and Harris seem perfectly suited for their roles, here's hope that Jet Howard will be as well. We have one player on the roster that is, or will be, a high volume scorer in Paolo with Franz projecting to be a star in his own right contributing on both ends and probably averaging 20 points as well.

Teams do not have 20+ points scorers at all 5 positions, but everyone need to have needed skills and put in efforts. I do not care how many points Cole, Harris or Jet will average. I want them to shoot when open and to hit their shots at league average or better, if they are not open then move the ball and pass to open shooter. They all seem a bench level talent, so defense is not that much important, but I don't think they will be abused either, with Harris also being above average on that end.
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 8,040
And1: 4,337
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#103 » by OrlChamps2030 » Thu Jul 20, 2023 11:36 am

fendilim wrote:
OrlChamps2030 wrote:
fendilim wrote:This is the problem with Suggs whole scenario though.

I think a lot of people projected him to be a allstar/superstar because of the position he was picked. But in reality, he is more of a culture setter. He is more of Jrue Holiday than Gary Payton.


Of course he was drafted to be a star. He's just now a "culture setter" because he hasn't lived up to those all-star expectations of a #5 pick. You can even find undrafted culture setters.

Jrue Holiday was always a better shooter and better ball handler/PG than Suggs. He was never just a "culture setter". Smart is a better comparison for Suggs.

Suggs was projected more of a culture setter than a star even before his rookie season started.

In fact, even most of the comparison he got prior to the draft were Chauncey or Jrue. Not even superstar talents. Those players he were compared to succeeded playing supporting roles. But they were stars of mediocrity when put in the spotlight of a leading role.


Billups and Jrue are all stars though?
User avatar
VFX
RealGM
Posts: 18,888
And1: 16,509
Joined: May 30, 2016

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#104 » by VFX » Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:14 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
orlando_joe wrote:with all this what do you see him returning pick wise? i am sure its not much..he has more value to magic then he can return
and why magic wont just dump him..his value is all time low now..thats why seeing if he improves has more value then return at this point
The Magic aren't trading Suggs. That's ridiculous.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Magic never trade anybody until it's proven that player no longer belongs in any team's active rotation or player(s) tolds media he is done with a team.

Suggs value won't raise with him playing wrong position and benig bench player either. Just like Wiseman, Monk, Kuminga , Toppin and others didn't raise their value being bench players either.

And Magic will continue to be without starting quality SG.
And we will continue to suffer in W-L column because we are treating SG spot as dumping- bodies- shallow grave.

I'm not suggesting dumping him asap, but question needs to be asked : what's Suggs future with Magic?

Does he view himself as backup SG for rest of his Magic days ? Why would he want to play SG in first place?

And it's not like Magic have any reasons to keep him. They have Fultz, Cole and Black all wanting to play PG.


You do know players can hold value in other roles outside of being a traditional starting point guard or shooting guard right?

A few things here…

Suggs is going into year 3 with an upward trajectory on his shooting. We haven’t seen the finished project. This isn’t his year 7 of being in the league.

It depends on what we are talking about with player skill sets in relation to cost/benefit analysis. Do you want to pay Jordan Poole $28m/4 because he can shoot and play non existent defense, or even Trae Young $40m/4 for a heightened version of the same thing? Maybe. Maybe not. It depends on what the rest of your team looks like. Is Franz and Paolo good enough defensively that Orlando doesn’t benefit from a player like Suggs?

Jalen could progress to the starting SG, or maybe he ends up backing up Jett. The bottom line is that Orlando lacks toughness on defense. The Magic lacked variability on that side of the court for the last decade. Playoff teams need players like that.

I don’t disagree with your assessment that the FO holds onto players until they are expired milk as assets. It’s just not the case with Suggs 3 years into his career on a rookie deal. We can talk after he signs his extension about weighing the options should he not progress.

I don’t get why people are quick to pull the trigger on guys with deals like these. If we are talking about potentially $20m+ 1-2 years from now I’ll start listening to serious arguments. There isn’t one to be made right now otherwise. Gary Harris is invisible on the court 90% of the time and Jett Howard hasn’t logged a single minute after being a reach pick. The alternatives are trade ideas people are coming up with in 2k.
JoshuaPotter
Analyst
Posts: 3,703
And1: 1,056
Joined: Dec 19, 2022
   

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#105 » by JoshuaPotter » Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:15 pm

Guys this is fairly simple.

Suggs has the talent right now to belong in the NBA as a 3&D spark plug great defense type player.

I think its way to early to cut the cord. Cross compare this to Fultz who is closer to his supposed peak in terms of "what you see is what you get". Going into his final second contract year.

Suggs in theory has 2-3 more years of watching him grow and seeing what he becomes even if that does overrun his rookie contract.

Black, definitely means if you want to see Suggs play it has to be in the "G" slot, a trade has to happen or and why would anyone be surprised. An injury. I personally hold out hope for a future PG / SG Black + Suggs backcourt in the starting lineup. "But where will shooting come from?" Well hopefully between Franz, Paulo, Wendell, and Suggs becoming better average shooters overall the floor will spread itself.

Man this post is too many words.

Edit : Also there is very little possibility that Suggs loses value as at this point I think many teams would view his potential floor as proven.
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,862
And1: 29,893
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#106 » by Knightro » Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:43 pm

Even if he doesn't improve at all from this point forward, Suggs is right now already able to give 20 perfectly capable MPG as a backup SG with plus defense.
jezzerinho
Analyst
Posts: 3,225
And1: 2,257
Joined: Jul 08, 2019
   

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#107 » by jezzerinho » Thu Jul 20, 2023 1:52 pm

Knightro wrote:Even if he doesn't improve at all from this point forward, Suggs is right now already able to give 20 perfectly capable MPG as a backup SG with plus defense.


On net rating, which i know isnt the be-all, the best lineup post Christmas was Fultz, Suggs, Wagner, Banchero and Carter Jr.

It narrowly surpassed the same lineup with Harris.

I think the momentum is with Suggs and he should be the starter or at least guy with most minutes.
Residual-Heat
Starter
Posts: 2,355
And1: 1,398
Joined: Feb 03, 2023
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#108 » by Residual-Heat » Thu Jul 20, 2023 2:34 pm

no one has answered this question yet, for those that think we should trade him, what do you expect in return?
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,940
And1: 5,505
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#109 » by fendilim » Thu Jul 20, 2023 2:46 pm

OrlChamps2030 wrote:
fendilim wrote:
OrlChamps2030 wrote:
Of course he was drafted to be a star. He's just now a "culture setter" because he hasn't lived up to those all-star expectations of a #5 pick. You can even find undrafted culture setters.

Jrue Holiday was always a better shooter and better ball handler/PG than Suggs. He was never just a "culture setter". Smart is a better comparison for Suggs.

Suggs was projected more of a culture setter than a star even before his rookie season started.

In fact, even most of the comparison he got prior to the draft were Chauncey or Jrue. Not even superstar talents. Those players he were compared to succeeded playing supporting roles. But they were stars of mediocrity when put in the spotlight of a leading role.


Billups and Jrue are all stars though?
yes, they are.

Aaron gordon was compared to shawn marion? Is he considered a failure because he hasnt even played an allstar game?
Image
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,917
And1: 1,919
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#110 » by orlando_joe » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:02 pm

Residual-Heat wrote:no one has answered this question yet, for those that think we should trade him, what do you expect in return?

thats so in 2-3 yrs they can say waited to long and could have got more if traded sooner like they wanted...lol
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,495
And1: 19,596
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#111 » by pepe1991 » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:11 pm

MagicMatic wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
basketballRob wrote:The Magic aren't trading Suggs. That's ridiculous.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Magic never trade anybody until it's proven that player no longer belongs in any team's active rotation or player(s) tolds media he is done with a team.

Suggs value won't raise with him playing wrong position and benig bench player either. Just like Wiseman, Monk, Kuminga , Toppin and others didn't raise their value being bench players either.

And Magic will continue to be without starting quality SG.
And we will continue to suffer in W-L column because we are treating SG spot as dumping- bodies- shallow grave.

I'm not suggesting dumping him asap, but question needs to be asked : what's Suggs future with Magic?

Does he view himself as backup SG for rest of his Magic days ? Why would he want to play SG in first place?

And it's not like Magic have any reasons to keep him. They have Fultz, Cole and Black all wanting to play PG.


You do know players can hold value in other roles outside of being a traditional starting point guard or shooting guard right?

A few things here…

Suggs is going into year 3 with an upward trajectory on his shooting. We haven’t seen the finished project. This isn’t his year 7 of being in the league.

It depends on what we are talking about with player skill sets in relation to cost/benefit analysis. Do you want to pay Jordan Poole $28m/4 because he can shoot and play non existent defense, or even Trae Young $40m/4 for a heightened version of the same thing? Maybe. Maybe not. It depends on what the rest of your team looks like. Is Franz and Paolo good enough defensively that Orlando doesn’t benefit from a player like Suggs?

Jalen could progress to the starting SG, or maybe he ends up backing up Jett. The bottom line is that Orlando lacks toughness on defense. The Magic lacked variability on that side of the court for the last decade. Playoff teams need players like that.

I don’t disagree with your assessment that the FO holds onto players until they are expired milk as assets. It’s just not the case with Suggs 3 years into his career on a rookie deal. We can talk after he signs his extension about weighing the options should he not progress.

I don’t get why people are quick to pull the trigger on guys with deals like these. If we are talking about potentially $20m+ 1-2 years from now I’ll start listening to serious arguments. There isn’t one to be made right now otherwise. Gary Harris is invisible on the court 90% of the time and Jett Howard hasn’t logged a single minute after being a reach pick. The alternatives are trade ideas people are coming up with in 2k.


You do know players can hold value in other roles outside of being a traditional starting point guard or shooting guard right?

When you are 6'3 -200 pounds person with 6'5 wingspan in NBA, only position you can play is PG and SG.Roles such player can provide are: ballhandler, off ball shooter. Pretty much that's it.

Suggs is going into year 3 with an upward trajectory on his shooting. We haven’t seen the finished project. This isn’t his year 7 of being in the league.


Based on what?
College 33,7% for 3 - 75% FTs
Rookie 21% for 3 - 77% FTs
Sophmore 32,7% for 3 and 72% FTs

College and Sophmore season pretty much mirror themselfs, and one outliner happends to be one of worst shooting performances even for a rookie, in very long time.


It depends on what the rest of your team looks like. Is Franz and Paolo good enough defensively that Orlando doesn’t benefit from a player like Suggs?

And turnover prone, bad decision maker, below average shooter, unnatural SG sounds like pefect fit just because he tries hard on defense during period of season nobody esle does?


Jalen could progress to the starting SG, or maybe he ends up backing up Jett.

When did we established Jett as SG? Based on fact that he couldn't guard SGs in college or during SL garbage league ?
I'm willing to bet my house on notion that Jett can't move his feet fast enough to guard guards in nba.

It’s just not the case with Suggs 3 years into his career on a rookie deal. We can talk after he signs his extension about weighing the options should he not progress.


This is garbage argument and you know it. You know player loses value as soon as new contract is signed, your upper examples of Poole and Trae Young prove that. Suggs is way more valuable with just 2 injury prone seasons as trade asset than with 4 ( potentially injury prone) mediocre seasons and making twice or three times more money. All that while being 2 yeras older.

I don’t get why people are quick to pull the trigger on guys with deals like these. If we are talking about potentially $20m+ 1-2 years from now I’ll start listening to serious arguments. There isn’t one to be made right now otherwise. Gary Harris is invisible on the court 90% of the time and Jett Howard hasn’t logged a single minute after being a reach pick. The alternatives are trade ideas people are coming up with in 2k


Image
You realize that difference between Suggs last year, and Gary Harris year prior is almost non existent in terms of production?

Difference between them comes from fact that even in year where Harris shot better and scored more points, he still had lower usage rate.
And in 2022-23, Harris usage rate dropped to 12% where Suggs still has near 21% usage rate. And despite all that he only averages 1,6 ppg more DESPITE SHOOTING TWO SHOTS A GAME MORE?

Jalen Suggs in starting 5 will just be 5th option and average even less shots, if he shares floor with established group of Fultz, Wendell, Franz and Bacnhero. We can assume Banchero will actually average even more shots, so will Franz. So even if you decide to cream Suggs into that group, he will hardly ever touch ball, because there simply won't be enough balls for everybody to shoot.


Only arguments for Suggs as starting SG are non-logical and subjective. I like him because he is 5th overall pick and i prefer 5th overall pick to start over Gary Harris because Raptors fans troll me on reddit. That sort of BS. There is zero reasons why would Magic terrible spaced 5 replace elite shooter with below average who also happends to be turnover machine and pretty much basketball dummy in terms of decision making.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,495
And1: 19,596
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#112 » by pepe1991 » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:15 pm

orlando_joe wrote:
Residual-Heat wrote:no one has answered this question yet, for those that think we should trade him, what do you expect in return?

thats so in 2-3 yrs they can say waited to long and could have got more if traded sooner like they wanted...lol


Vassell for Suggs, Nuggets pick and 2026 Suns swap rights, hell i'll give them top 5 protected 2024 pick as well.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Residual-Heat
Starter
Posts: 2,355
And1: 1,398
Joined: Feb 03, 2023
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#113 » by Residual-Heat » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:26 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
orlando_joe wrote:
Residual-Heat wrote:no one has answered this question yet, for those that think we should trade him, what do you expect in return?

thats so in 2-3 yrs they can say waited to long and could have got more if traded sooner like they wanted...lol


Vassell for Suggs, Nuggets pick and 2026 Suns swap rights, hell i'll give them top 5 protected 2024 pick as well.

Who said the Spurs are trading Vassell? Let me rephrase the question. What value type of value do you think Suggs has? If we were to trade him for a pick, what pick do we get back?
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,495
And1: 19,596
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#114 » by pepe1991 » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:36 pm

Residual-Heat wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
orlando_joe wrote:thats so in 2-3 yrs they can say waited to long and could have got more if traded sooner like they wanted...lol


Vassell for Suggs, Nuggets pick and 2026 Suns swap rights, hell i'll give them top 5 protected 2024 pick as well.

Who said the Spurs are trading Vassell? Let me rephrase the question. What value type of value do you think Suggs has? If we were to trade him for a pick, what pick do we get back?


I'm one of firm belivers that Spurs won't trade Vassell but he is very popular name here on forum

If it's 2024 draft, you could probably get 10th -15th pick for him given everybody thinks 2024 draft class sucks.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
JBSouthpaw
Analyst
Posts: 3,371
And1: 1,352
Joined: Mar 01, 2011

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#115 » by JBSouthpaw » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:42 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
orlando_joe wrote:
Residual-Heat wrote:no one has answered this question yet, for those that think we should trade him, what do you expect in return?

thats so in 2-3 yrs they can say waited to long and could have got more if traded sooner like they wanted...lol


Vassell for Suggs, Nuggets pick and 2026 Suns swap rights, hell i'll give them top 5 protected 2024 pick as well.


To get anything that will help this roster, it's going to take those picks too. Doesn't matter if it's Fultz, Suggs, Cole or G. Harris.
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 8,040
And1: 4,337
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#116 » by OrlChamps2030 » Thu Jul 20, 2023 3:53 pm

fendilim wrote:
OrlChamps2030 wrote:
fendilim wrote:Suggs was projected more of a culture setter than a star even before his rookie season started.

In fact, even most of the comparison he got prior to the draft were Chauncey or Jrue. Not even superstar talents. Those players he were compared to succeeded playing supporting roles. But they were stars of mediocrity when put in the spotlight of a leading role.


Billups and Jrue are all stars though?
yes, they are.

Aaron gordon was compared to shawn marion? Is he considered a failure because he hasnt even played an allstar game?


I never said anything about anyone being a failure? I'm not even sure what your point is anymore. My point was - Suggs has a long way to go to be a Billups/Holiday level guy and if those are his expectations, he has not lived up to them yet.

But yes Aaron Gordon didn't live up to expectations here - he was a 4th pick that was traded for a China-league guy and a protected draft pick from the future champions. When Shawn Marion was Aaron Gordon's age he had already made 3 all-star games and 2 all-nba teams.
Residual-Heat
Starter
Posts: 2,355
And1: 1,398
Joined: Feb 03, 2023
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#117 » by Residual-Heat » Thu Jul 20, 2023 4:09 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
Residual-Heat wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
Vassell for Suggs, Nuggets pick and 2026 Suns swap rights, hell i'll give them top 5 protected 2024 pick as well.

Who said the Spurs are trading Vassell? Let me rephrase the question. What value type of value do you think Suggs has? If we were to trade him for a pick, what pick do we get back?


I'm one of firm belivers that Spurs won't trade Vassell but he is very popular name here on forum

If it's 2024 draft, you could probably get 10th -15th pick for him given everybody thinks 2024 draft class sucks.

Not sure I see a lottery team willing to give up a pick for Suggs, but even if you did get a 10-15 pick in a weak draft. At that point what type of prospect are you looking to draft? A star? Likely a role player at best. Id rather just keep Suggs and see what he develops into than draft 10-15 and hope we find someone as good as him.

Just pretend Suggs was drafted 10-15 instead of 5th if it makes you feel better :lol:
Residual-Heat
Starter
Posts: 2,355
And1: 1,398
Joined: Feb 03, 2023
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#118 » by Residual-Heat » Thu Jul 20, 2023 4:33 pm

pepe1991 wrote:
MagicMatic wrote:
pepe1991 wrote:
Magic never trade anybody until it's proven that player no longer belongs in any team's active rotation or player(s) tolds media he is done with a team.

Suggs value won't raise with him playing wrong position and benig bench player either. Just like Wiseman, Monk, Kuminga , Toppin and others didn't raise their value being bench players either.

And Magic will continue to be without starting quality SG.
And we will continue to suffer in W-L column because we are treating SG spot as dumping- bodies- shallow grave.

I'm not suggesting dumping him asap, but question needs to be asked : what's Suggs future with Magic?

Does he view himself as backup SG for rest of his Magic days ? Why would he want to play SG in first place?

And it's not like Magic have any reasons to keep him. They have Fultz, Cole and Black all wanting to play PG.


You do know players can hold value in other roles outside of being a traditional starting point guard or shooting guard right?

A few things here…

Suggs is going into year 3 with an upward trajectory on his shooting. We haven’t seen the finished project. This isn’t his year 7 of being in the league.

It depends on what we are talking about with player skill sets in relation to cost/benefit analysis. Do you want to pay Jordan Poole $28m/4 because he can shoot and play non existent defense, or even Trae Young $40m/4 for a heightened version of the same thing? Maybe. Maybe not. It depends on what the rest of your team looks like. Is Franz and Paolo good enough defensively that Orlando doesn’t benefit from a player like Suggs?

Jalen could progress to the starting SG, or maybe he ends up backing up Jett. The bottom line is that Orlando lacks toughness on defense. The Magic lacked variability on that side of the court for the last decade. Playoff teams need players like that.

I don’t disagree with your assessment that the FO holds onto players until they are expired milk as assets. It’s just not the case with Suggs 3 years into his career on a rookie deal. We can talk after he signs his extension about weighing the options should he not progress.

I don’t get why people are quick to pull the trigger on guys with deals like these. If we are talking about potentially $20m+ 1-2 years from now I’ll start listening to serious arguments. There isn’t one to be made right now otherwise. Gary Harris is invisible on the court 90% of the time and Jett Howard hasn’t logged a single minute after being a reach pick. The alternatives are trade ideas people are coming up with in 2k.


You do know players can hold value in other roles outside of being a traditional starting point guard or shooting guard right?

When you are 6'3 -200 pounds person with 6'5 wingspan in NBA, only position you can play is PG and SG.Roles such player can provide are: ballhandler, off ball shooter. Pretty much that's it.

Suggs is going into year 3 with an upward trajectory on his shooting. We haven’t seen the finished project. This isn’t his year 7 of being in the league.


Based on what?
College 33,7% for 3 - 75% FTs
Rookie 21% for 3 - 77% FTs
Sophmore 32,7% for 3 and 72% FTs

College and Sophmore season pretty much mirror themselfs, and one outliner happends to be one of worst shooting performances even for a rookie, in very long time.


It depends on what the rest of your team looks like. Is Franz and Paolo good enough defensively that Orlando doesn’t benefit from a player like Suggs?

And turnover prone, bad decision maker, below average shooter, unnatural SG sounds like pefect fit just because he tries hard on defense during period of season nobody esle does?


Jalen could progress to the starting SG, or maybe he ends up backing up Jett.

When did we established Jett as SG? Based on fact that he couldn't guard SGs in college or during SL garbage league ?
I'm willing to bet my house on notion that Jett can't move his feet fast enough to guard guards in nba.

It’s just not the case with Suggs 3 years into his career on a rookie deal. We can talk after he signs his extension about weighing the options should he not progress.


This is garbage argument and you know it. You know player loses value as soon as new contract is signed, your upper examples of Poole and Trae Young prove that. Suggs is way more valuable with just 2 injury prone seasons as trade asset than with 4 ( potentially injury prone) mediocre seasons and making twice or three times more money. All that while being 2 yeras older.

I don’t get why people are quick to pull the trigger on guys with deals like these. If we are talking about potentially $20m+ 1-2 years from now I’ll start listening to serious arguments. There isn’t one to be made right now otherwise. Gary Harris is invisible on the court 90% of the time and Jett Howard hasn’t logged a single minute after being a reach pick. The alternatives are trade ideas people are coming up with in 2k


Image
You realize that difference between Suggs last year, and Gary Harris year prior is almost non existent in terms of production?

Difference between them comes from fact that even in year where Harris shot better and scored more points, he still had lower usage rate.
And in 2022-23, Harris usage rate dropped to 12% where Suggs still has near 21% usage rate. And despite all that he only averages 1,6 ppg more DESPITE SHOOTING TWO SHOTS A GAME MORE?

Jalen Suggs in starting 5 will just be 5th option and average even less shots, if he shares floor with established group of Fultz, Wendell, Franz and Bacnhero. We can assume Banchero will actually average even more shots, so will Franz. So even if you decide to cream Suggs into that group, he will hardly ever touch ball, because there simply won't be enough balls for everybody to shoot.


Only arguments for Suggs as starting SG are non-logical and subjective. I like him because he is 5th overall pick and i prefer 5th overall pick to start over Gary Harris because Raptors fans troll me on reddit. That sort of BS. There is zero reasons why would Magic terrible spaced 5 replace elite shooter with below average who also happends to be turnover machine and pretty much basketball dummy in terms of decision making.

I dont have time to reply to all of this, but the bolded part is especially funny. You mean the regular season? I guess all stats in the regular season dont matter then.. Youre trying real hard to discredit his defense here.
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,917
And1: 1,919
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#119 » by orlando_joe » Thu Jul 20, 2023 4:57 pm

OrlChamps2030 wrote:
fendilim wrote:
OrlChamps2030 wrote:
Billups and Jrue are all stars though?
yes, they are.

Aaron gordon was compared to shawn marion? Is he considered a failure because he hasnt even played an allstar game?


I never said anything about anyone being a failure? I'm not even sure what your point is anymore. My point was - Suggs has a long way to go to be a Billups/Holiday level guy and if those are his expectations, he has not lived up to them yet.

But yes Aaron Gordon didn't live up to expectations here - he was a 4th pick that was traded for a China-league guy and a protected draft pick from the future champions. When Shawn Marion was Aaron Gordon's age he had already made 3 all-star games and 2 all-nba teams.

facts help denver gave there just picked first rj after 25 games played in rookie season and a top 5 protected first thats about as close to 2 first as you can get
harris was a young player still at time coming off injury..
and at time 2 of there starters mpj and murray coming off injurys to monday morning quarter back is kinda funny
and ag was saying he wanted to get max and play in cali...thats facts at time...
magic did great at time of trade... looking back yrs later is what it is
User avatar
Knightro
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 28,862
And1: 29,893
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
Location: Jersey
 

Re: Position Battles: SG 

Post#120 » by Knightro » Thu Jul 20, 2023 5:27 pm

Read on Twitter

Return to Orlando Magic