younggunsmn wrote:shrink wrote:younggunsmn wrote:We may not always agree, but I'm tired of getting my head bit off every time I say something less than flattering about Gobert.
I even made a concerted effort to note a part of Shrink's post I agreed with at the end of my post but he cropped that out and went all out to flame my Gobert take. I don't need your psychobabble about my intentions.
I'd rather we just agree to disagree about Gobert moving forward.
You’re tired? We’re all tired.
CAN you move forward on Gobert? Do you still need to turn every thread into an exaggerated WoT complaint, over and over?
I'm not going to cease from discussing Gobert just because it triggers you.
He's a big part of the team and will keep popping up in many areas including trades, salary cap issues and teammates.
You're the one who keeps flaming and exaggerating my Gobert takes, thereby thrusting him to the forefront of the discussion, instead of discussing him as part of the entire picture, which includes comparisons to Jaden McDaniels as above average interior/perimeter defenders and what is the relative value of that, as well as the effect of his contract on a potential Jaden extension.
I''m not going to respond to anything you say about Gobert anymore though or anything you say about something I said about Gobert,
Because at this point we are both hopelessly dug in and it's not good for anyone.
That's very unlikely to change until they start playing basketball games again.
Please do the same if you can't keep it from being about me.
I don't see anything out of line I said in this thread other than maybe overenthusiastic posting.
I didn't deserve that last tirade. You're better than that.
Dude, I’m not flaming your takes. I’m flaming your “facts.” And I’m flaming your abuse of the board, inserting your Rudy “facts” into threads where they don’t apply.
You want evidence? Just scroll back only two pages. I didn’t introduce Gobert into the Jaden McDaniel discussion. I said C’s are not the RB’s of the NFL, and this was off topic. You tried to turn it into Gobert, and I answered one line, saying I wasn’t referring to Rudy. Then YOU specifically asked ME about Gobert. I posted a paragraph about wanting to see Jaden and Rudy together. Then you went off on another, Wall of Text, Anti-Rudy rant, and 90% had absolutely nothing to do with Jaden McDaniels whatsoever. That’s “triggered.” Or check all the other MIN threads. Obviously, I can’t be rebutting your Gobert “facts” if you don’t post them, everywhere, first.
It’s weird that you say I am triggered by Gobert, I have resisted using the word for you, but I think it’s amply true. Look how many Gobert posts you’ve made. Look at how long they are. Look how you post them in every thread, regardless of whether they are off topic. If people say the G-word, it triggers the same 8-12 paragraphs from you, every one straying farther and farther from the truth.
I’m not saying don’t hate on Rudy. I’m saying do it with honest, non-spun, facts, and do it in the appropriate threads where that is the discussion.










