Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed

Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

heezyo2o
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 1,343
Joined: Oct 16, 2004

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#61 » by heezyo2o » Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:42 pm

I really liked Rachel Nichols on the Jump. The couple times I've seen her on PTI, I thought she was really quick with the banter and debating topics.

Maybe it's just skip though, but I don't like the pairing so doubt I'll ever watch it
GamecockFan1024
Junior
Posts: 395
And1: 374
Joined: Aug 03, 2020
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#62 » by GamecockFan1024 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:46 pm

Embarrassing lineup. Sheesh.
heezyo2o
Starter
Posts: 2,406
And1: 1,343
Joined: Oct 16, 2004

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#63 » by heezyo2o » Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:48 pm

hyper316 wrote:
Kobeskillz wrote:
Johnny Tomala wrote:She is great, super hot, intelligent. I never get the hate on Rachel. Rachel > Malika.

super hot? lol. :crazy:


Why does every female tv personality have to be commented about their looks?

I don't see people commenting Richard Sherman or Lil Wayne being handsome or not

Nichols does her research before player interviews and asks insightful questions, players get along well with her and open up.


When Brady enters the booth, people are going to comment on his looks.

No one is calling Skip "hot," but it's pretty common to hear that he looks great for his age.

Men and females who are thought to be attractive get comments about it
Shock Defeat
RealGM
Posts: 10,808
And1: 18,985
Joined: Aug 30, 2012
       

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#64 » by Shock Defeat » Thu Aug 10, 2023 6:51 pm

hyper316 wrote:
Kobeskillz wrote:
Johnny Tomala wrote:She is great, super hot, intelligent. I never get the hate on Rachel. Rachel > Malika.

super hot? lol. :crazy:


Why does every female tv personality have to be commented about their looks?

I don't see people commenting Richard Sherman or Lil Wayne being handsome or not

Nichols does her research before player interviews and asks insightful questions, players get along well with her and open up.

Society

Women are supposed to be beautiful which is why majority of women spend hours getting ready doing makeup. Why they spend hundreds at the salon, getting nails done etc.
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,191
And1: 2,386
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#65 » by NoStatsGuy » Thu Aug 10, 2023 7:48 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
rtiff68 wrote:Can we check in for a moment: who here that posts regularly— or at all— actually watches “First Take” or “Undisputed?”


I wonder if watchers of these shows are a protected class. Like can we ask in a job interview if someone watches and if they say yes can we use that for grounds to not hire? I mean...it seems reasonable but smoking in some states is protected. I'd assume this falls under a mental illness, which maybe we can't base hiring and firing on?


you are reaching or trolling. i cant really tell

nothing is wrong with watching any of these shows. its entertainment. some peopel watch other trash tv as in reality tv or what not.. or the same tv show over and over.

you have an issue, if you cant differentiate between entertainment and proper basketball analysis. not the people that watch and like first take or undisputed.
im bout dat action boss
symbiotic
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 01, 2006
Location: Marble Garden Zone
 

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#66 » by symbiotic » Thu Aug 10, 2023 7:50 pm

A little on the older side, but still decent. Kind of like Topanga
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 15,232
And1: 5,052
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#67 » by JonFromVA » Thu Aug 10, 2023 7:58 pm

KodiakBear wrote:I really wish Skip Bayless was less popular and didn't have a career anymore. Call me "triggered" or whatever, but he is really a microcosm for how our media landscape has gotten so bad. He is somebody with zero integrity, has no convictions behind anything he says and only cares about saying outrageous things to get clicks and get people talking about him. You can come back at me "it's just sports, who cares?" And maybe that's true, but he is still extremely sleazy and even in sports, I prefer decent honest people.


I wished the WWE would go away the moment I found it was all fake, but it's only gotten bigger and bigger.

In a sense Stephen A Smith showed more courage by not going with another Max Kellerman or Shannon Sharpe/Richard Sherman type, but by bringing in people appropriate to yell about the subject at hand. It's very difficult for one person to speak intelligently about multiple players across multiple teams across multiple sports. You really need a crazy sports-a-holic for the role, but guess they make do with producers and show prep.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,154
And1: 70,290
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#68 » by clyde21 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 8:06 pm

hyper316 wrote:
Kobeskillz wrote:
Johnny Tomala wrote:She is great, super hot, intelligent. I never get the hate on Rachel. Rachel > Malika.

super hot? lol. :crazy:


Why does every female tv personality have to be commented about their looks?


b/c the vast majority of them get hired because of their looks. that's just the fact.

doubt if Malika Andrews was ugly as hell she'd have a job at ESPN right now.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,305
And1: 6,804
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#69 » by Harry Palmer » Thu Aug 10, 2023 8:08 pm

clyde21 wrote:
hyper316 wrote:
Kobeskillz wrote:super hot? lol. :crazy:


Why does every female tv personality have to be commented about their looks?


b/c the vast majority of them get hired because of their looks. that's just the fact.

doubt if Malika Andrews was ugly as hell she'd have a job at ESPN right now.



I think you’re confusing identifying the problem with participating in the problem.
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,080
And1: 27,552
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#70 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 8:31 pm

NoStatsGuy wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
rtiff68 wrote:Can we check in for a moment: who here that posts regularly— or at all— actually watches “First Take” or “Undisputed?”


I wonder if watchers of these shows are a protected class. Like can we ask in a job interview if someone watches and if they say yes can we use that for grounds to not hire? I mean...it seems reasonable but smoking in some states is protected. I'd assume this falls under a mental illness, which maybe we can't base hiring and firing on?


you are reaching or trolling. i cant really tell

nothing is wrong with watching any of these shows. its entertainment. some peopel watch other trash tv as in reality tv or what not.. or the same tv show over and over.

you have an issue, if you cant differentiate between entertainment and proper basketball analysis. not the people that watch and like first take or undisputed.


I'm more concerned people find this entertaining. Yes, I do think this is a valid question and would be a strong indicator of someone that will likely under preform in any role that requires critical thinking skills. If you watch these shows, I don't care what you think. I don't care what you say. And I do not respect you.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,080
And1: 27,552
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#71 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 8:35 pm

KodiakBear wrote:I really wish Skip Bayless was less popular and didn't have a career anymore. Call me "triggered" or whatever, but he is really a microcosm for how our media landscape has gotten so bad. He is somebody with zero integrity, has no convictions behind anything he says and only cares about saying outrageous things to get clicks and get people talking about him. You can come back at me "it's just sports, who cares?" And maybe that's true, but he is still extremely sleazy and even in sports, I prefer decent honest people.


Agree 100%. This style of "news" has caused serious damage to society. While I'd love to think it's just sports and it doesn't carry over elsewhere, it does. It feels crazy to link Skip and SAS to deaths in society, but their methods are being copied to incite violence outside of sports.
Mickey8
Head Coach
Posts: 6,376
And1: 5,233
Joined: Jan 21, 2017

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#72 » by Mickey8 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:14 pm

dan-man wrote:Imagine the ratings if she did the show naked...just keeping it real.

She's not even that pretty, has annoying voice and that dumb smirk on her face and she's bad at following basketball.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,154
And1: 70,290
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#73 » by clyde21 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:33 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
hyper316 wrote:
Why does every female tv personality have to be commented about their looks?


b/c the vast majority of them get hired because of their looks. that's just the fact.

doubt if Malika Andrews was ugly as hell she'd have a job at ESPN right now.



I think you’re confusing identifying the problem with participating in the problem.


personally im shocked why anyone would mention the looks of a female espn reporter, totally off topic.

Image
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
infinite11285
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,195
And1: 27,127
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#74 » by infinite11285 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:40 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
b/c the vast majority of them get hired because of their looks. that's just the fact.

doubt if Malika Andrews was ugly as hell she'd have a job at ESPN right now.



I think you’re confusing identifying the problem with participating in the problem.


personally im shocked why anyone would mention the looks of a female espn reporter, totally off topic.

Image


Do you work for ESPN?
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,154
And1: 70,290
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#75 » by clyde21 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:43 pm

i don't have to work for ESPN to realize the hiring process for female hosts/reporters has a lot to do with how they look.

which i am not knocking them for, men like looking at pretty women and they know their audience is majority men...but let's not pretend that it's somehow off limits to realize whats happening here lol
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,305
And1: 6,804
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#76 » by Harry Palmer » Thu Aug 10, 2023 9:58 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
b/c the vast majority of them get hired because of their looks. that's just the fact.

doubt if Malika Andrews was ugly as hell she'd have a job at ESPN right now.



I think you’re confusing identifying the problem with participating in the problem.


personally im shocked why anyone would mention the looks of a female espn reporter, totally off topic.

Image


Yeah, pretty sure you missed my point. Let me back up a bit: do you think female anchors/commentators/journalists should be hired/fired/promoted/demoted based on their physical attractiveness ?
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 7,809
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#77 » by Impuniti » Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:08 pm

Johnny Tomala wrote:She is great, super hot, intelligent. I never get the hate on Rachel. Rachel > Malika.

That's not saying much though. Malike is atrocious and insufferable.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,154
And1: 70,290
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#78 » by clyde21 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:12 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:Yeah, pretty sure you missed my point. Let me back up a bit: do you think female anchors/commentators/journalists should be hired/fired/promoted/demoted based on their physical attractiveness ?


I mean I wouldn't want them out here looking like Lizzo but generally no, they should just hire the best talent.

but they don't, and clearly looks weigh disproportionately in their decision making process...so not sure why you're calling people out here when talking about their looks when that's clearly part of their equation.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,305
And1: 6,804
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#79 » by Harry Palmer » Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:14 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:Yeah, pretty sure you missed my point. Let me back up a bit: do you think female anchors/commentators/journalists should be hired/fired/promoted/demoted based on their physical attractiveness ?


I mean I wouldn't want them out here looking like Lizzo but generally no, they should just hire the best talent.

but they don't, and clearly weight looks disproportionately so not sure why you're calling people out here when talking about their looks when that's clearly part of their equation.


Because if you think it’s wrong, you should not participate in the kind of behaviour that sustains that wrong happening? Not saying you are obligated to be part of the solution, but at least don’t be part of the problem. Sound reasonable?
War does not determine who is right, only who is left.

-attributed to Bertrand Russell
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,154
And1: 70,290
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Rachel Nichols joining Skip Bayless on Undisputed 

Post#80 » by clyde21 » Thu Aug 10, 2023 10:21 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:Yeah, pretty sure you missed my point. Let me back up a bit: do you think female anchors/commentators/journalists should be hired/fired/promoted/demoted based on their physical attractiveness ?


I mean I wouldn't want them out here looking like Lizzo but generally no, they should just hire the best talent.

but they don't, and clearly weight looks disproportionately so not sure why you're calling people out here when talking about their looks when that's clearly part of their equation.


Because if you think it’s wrong, you should not participate in the kind of behaviour that sustains that wrong happening? Not saying you are obligated to be part of the solution, but at least don’t be part of the problem. Sound reasonable?


i dont think it's wrong or right, it just what it is...ESPN realizes majority of their audience are men and men like looking at pretty women...so I get it, even though ideally speaking you'd want the best talent on how these females look is part of the equation until its not.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن

Return to The General Board