Boogie! wrote:sbsat wrote:Boogie! wrote:
No one is triggered. Again stop projecting. You wanna see triggered, look up every discussion that involves he shall not be named. The fact that you can't even understand or won't understand the analogy I was using shows you're choosing to be ignorant and unwilling to accept my argument for what it is. See the post I just wrote before yours.
Norm is better than trent. It just is what it is. Not sure why people need to keep trying to prove otherwise. Was it a fair trade? Sure. Considering all the fleecings that happen for star players it's about as even as it gets in terms of trade value. But like I said keeping norm probably gets probably another playoff season... and the chemistry was already there, there would've been no weird tension with norm, fvv and siakam because they all came up together, and all were rooting for each other so that chemistry could've allowed all of them to succeed together.
That being said the core was flawed to begin with because no true star, so it doesn't matter at the end of the day.
So you agree it's a fair trade? That was my only original point. You just like debating sh*t for apparently no reason. At no point did i say trent was better. Do better reading peoples posts.
Like I said, you're the one that sounds triggered. You realize you're not the only one posting in this thread about norm right and that other people have said other things. Read the original post you replied to and stop being so upset.
No one said trent is better than norm and really no one on here is discounting how polished an offensive player norm is. So again not sure what your point is
