AussieCeltic wrote:Hate the Lakers but let’s not act like every team wouldn’t have done this.
The Pacers certainly would have.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

AussieCeltic wrote:Hate the Lakers but let’s not act like every team wouldn’t have done this.
zimpy27 wrote:On the other hand, you have a 1 in 30 chance of winning this tournament.. Some teams may never win it in our lifetime.

infinite11285 wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:Hate the Lakers but let’s not act like every team wouldn’t have done this.
The Pacers certainly would have.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
FarBeyondDriven wrote:this might be the most desperate and embarrassing thing a franchise has ever done. Maybe they'd all do it but it's still pathetic either way



YogurtProducer wrote:FarBeyondDriven wrote:this might be the most desperate and embarrassing thing a franchise has ever done. Maybe they'd all do it but it's still pathetic either way
Y'all hang a banner won by a different city. Come on dude.
YogurtProducer wrote:FarBeyondDriven wrote:this might be the most desperate and embarrassing thing a franchise has ever done. Maybe they'd all do it but it's still pathetic either way
Y'all hang a banner won by a different city. Come on dude.
zimpy27 wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:FarBeyondDriven wrote:this might be the most desperate and embarrassing thing a franchise has ever done. Maybe they'd all do it but it's still pathetic either way
Y'all hang a banner won by a different city. Come on dude.
Is that a Pacific division banner I'm looking at there?
SNPA wrote:zimpy27 wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:Y'all hang a banner won by a different city. Come on dude.
Is that a Pacific division banner I'm looking at there?
Yes. Much more consequential and harder to achieve than being the best team in November on Tuesdays and Fridays. (Still silly to hang it but…)
YogurtProducer wrote:SNPA wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
Is that a Pacific division banner I'm looking at there?
Yes. Much more consequential and harder to achieve than being the best team in November on Tuesdays and Fridays. (Still silly to hang it but…)
![]()
6 Division Winners every year.
1 In-season tournament winner.
Which one is harder again?
SNPA wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:SNPA wrote:Yes. Much more consequential and harder to achieve than being the best team in November on Tuesdays and Fridays. (Still silly to hang it but…)
![]()
6 Division Winners every year.
1 In-season tournament winner.
Which one is harder again?
The answer is the one that is not just about games in November on Tuesdays and Fridays.
YogurtProducer wrote:SNPA wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:![]()
6 Division Winners every year.
1 In-season tournament winner.
Which one is harder again?
The answer is the one that is not just about games in November on Tuesdays and Fridays.
And one is about the best team in a division of only 5 teams.
The NBA champion is the best team in April and May. I guess that is irrelevant to right?
SNPA wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:SNPA wrote:The answer is the one that is not just about games in November on Tuesdays and Fridays.
And one is about the best team in a division of only 5 teams.
The NBA champion is the best team in April and May. I guess that is irrelevant to right?
Nice try.
YogurtProducer wrote:SNPA wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:And one is about the best team in a division of only 5 teams.
The NBA champion is the best team in April and May. I guess that is irrelevant to right?
Nice try.
What is the difference?
SNPA wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:SNPA wrote:Nice try.
What is the difference?
Damn near a whole season and the entire playoffs.
Plus, history. And bragging rights. And respect. And stats. And…
Otherwise same.

SNPA wrote:zimpy27 wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:Y'all hang a banner won by a different city. Come on dude.
Is that a Pacific division banner I'm looking at there?
Yes. Much more consequential and harder to achieve than being the best team in November on Tuesdays and Fridays. (Still silly to hang it but…)