HMFFL wrote:shrink wrote:Jamaaliver wrote:I think what perplexes Trae's fans is that other star guards don't seem to get the same scrutiny.
Luka, Haliburton, Ja seem to get passes on their flaws and only focus on the production.
Even if this is (“but, some other guy ..!”) argument is true, continuing to post tweet after tweet about Trae’s offense is not going to change anyone’s mind.
Everyone knows Trae is great offensively. As I said, he needs to be better defensively to shift people’s ratings.
While any players defense has room for improvement, Trae has improved, and it's amusing how fans like you fail to even know that. It's easy to stick to the norm. Whole he's never going to be great at defense you should take notice that he has improved before commenting
I commented that flooding us with great offensive tweets isn’t going to change people’s minds on Trae? You disagree with that?
Or will we be treated with more, “but look at his offense!” bragposts? And more, “but but, Luka! Hali! Poor Trae!” excuses?
Look, I don’t even like to talk about defensive metrics, because there is no one good defensive stat. I think you can find a defensive stat to criticize or praise anybody. I checked DRtg, and he was 10th percentile. EPM (if you like plus/minus) says he’s almost average. And clinging to, “better than Trae used to be” does not even mean “okay.” But the bottom line is that Trae isn’t rated (PERCEIVED) higher because people believe his
defense, not his offense, is a problem. True or not, multiple vanity posts about his offense are not changing people’s minds about his defense.
Look, I got no dog in this fight. I don’t love or hate Trae. I even called him “great” offensively. I will repeat that if you Trae fans want to convince people he’s under-rated (which is the damn title here), then you should be filling this 35-page thread with defensive evidence. You disagree with that comment?