Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

GatorKid117
Sophomore
Posts: 142
And1: 63
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Location: UF

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#421 » by GatorKid117 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 10:56 pm

zero rings wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
So because of Cole, AB, Goga, Suggs the magic are the 4th best team in the east? I get everyone wanting to use Advanced stats, but watch the game and you'd see how ridiculous that sounds. Paolo has carried the team through a crazy amount of injuries over the past two months and we are still the 4th best team in the east.


This and other "insight" stating why Paolo is not as good as Chet has been the most hilariously ridiculous things I've read in quite some time.


You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.


https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/lineups?season=2023&seasontype=regseason&min_possessions=500#tab-four_factors

The Magic starters have a better point differential than OKCs....
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,903
And1: 15,064
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#422 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 8, 2024 10:58 pm

zero rings wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
So because of Cole, AB, Goga, Suggs the magic are the 4th best team in the east? I get everyone wanting to use Advanced stats, but watch the game and you'd see how ridiculous that sounds. Paolo has carried the team through a crazy amount of injuries over the past two months and we are still the 4th best team in the east.


This and other "insight" stating why Paolo is not as good as Chet has been the most hilariously ridiculous things I've read in quite some time.


You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.
Lebron James net rating was -4.6 his rookie season, and they went to the Finals. In year 2, it was -1.2. In year 4, it was -5.9. So obviously, Chet will be better than Lebron?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
MagicForLife
Sophomore
Posts: 129
And1: 26
Joined: Jun 17, 2004
Contact:

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#423 » by MagicForLife » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:10 pm

basketballRob wrote:
zero rings wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:
This and other "insight" stating why Paolo is not as good as Chet has been the most hilariously ridiculous things I've read in quite some time.


You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.
Lebron James net rating was -4.6 his rookie season, and they went to the Finals. In year 2, it was -1.2. In year 4, it was -5.9. So obviously, Chet will be better than Lebron?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Lebron James. :roll:
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#424 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:14 pm

OrlMagic05 wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:So, I realize that this is a thread comparing two guys, but I really want to speak to a point about Paulo being the first option.

While it's certainly harder to score efficiently at volume, that doesn't mean that the guy scoring at volume for a pretty-good team is carrying them.

The Magic are losing when Paolo is on the court, and doing a lot better when he's off of it. If the team wasn't so good with Paolo playing bench, literally no one would be even thinking about Paolo as an all-star candidate.

I don't hate Paolo. I'm not saying he sucks as a future foundation. But fundamentally we're talking about a guy who has the primacy he has because the Magic expect him to one day be a franchise player, not because them putting him in that position makes them a playoff team.

Let me also be clear: I'm not saying you could take a random bench guy on the Magic, give him Paolo's role and he'd do better. From an all-star perspective, it's simply a question of whether the team's record should lead us to overlook the fact that Paolo isn't actually producing eye-popping stats when you factor everything in the box score in on the grounds that he's having more impact than the box score says. And instead the indicators are that he's having less impact than his solid-but-not-amazing box score indicates.

Zooming out to the comparison: I do think it's hard to judge them confidently against each other right now because they are in different roles, and that at this point I don't think either of them lines up as a guy to get an all-star nod. There's no doubt that the presence of Shai is making Chet's life easier whereas Paolo's having to be the actual focal point of opposing defenses, and that's something I think about with Chet regardless of who he's being compared against.

But I'll also say that if I'm OKC I'm more confident about Chet's place in my future than I am if I'm Orlando with Paolo. Chet doesn't have to be my offensive alpha to fit with what I have, and his defense is just obviously nice.

For the Magic, were I them, I'd be thrilled at the improvement I see this year on the whole and expect I'd keep going with the plan I have...but I wouldn't delude myself into thinking I already have contender-level stars on my roster. Paolo & co needs to get better, and while that might seem like a "duh" statement, what I'm trying to convey is that the Magic record and seeding is making people look to give more credit to the anointed future star when really I think the story of the Magic this year is about the collective team lead by their coach.

This might sound like a skeptical take, but it potentially makes the team even more exciting. If they're this good while losing the Paolo minutes, imagine how good they'll be if he starts impacting like star.


So because of Cole, AB, Goga, Suggs the magic are the 4th best team in the east? I get everyone wanting to use Advanced stats, but watch the game and you'd see how ridiculous that sounds. Paolo has carried the team through a crazy amount of injuries over the past two months and we are still the 4th best team in the east.


When we say a team is winning with depth, we aren't saying that the backups are better than the starters, only that the team has a better rotation/bench than you'd expect given their overall quality - and yes that also means that starters/core is weaker than you'd expect given the overall quality. And this really isn't something that should seem crazy to anyone. It's literally true to an extent for just about half the teams in the league, there are top-heavy teams and there are deep teams. The Magic are the latter.

Let me put it to you like this. If we take the top 4 teams from both the East and West and look at their generally agreed upon stars for raw +/- - which speaks to how successful the team has been when they are on the court. Here's how it looks:

Jokic +328
Tatum +313
Shai +295
Kawhi +249
Embiid +247
Edwards +205
Giannis +187
Paolo -17

Clearly one of these things is not like the others. Maybe it seems unfair to compare Paolo to these other guys given their stature, but these guys do represent what you expect from the star of a Top 4 seed in the league at this time, and you can see that Paolo just doesn't fit.

I'm sorry man. I know you're excited about your young team and star, and I'm not saying you shouldn't be, but the fact is that this isn't a team having success by virtue of their alpha carrying them to this point in the season.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#425 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:18 pm

basketballRob wrote:
zero rings wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:
This and other "insight" stating why Paolo is not as good as Chet has been the most hilariously ridiculous things I've read in quite some time.


You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.
Lebron James net rating was -4.6 his rookie season, and they went to the Finals. In year 2, it was -1.2. In year 4, it was -5.9. So obviously, Chet will be better than Lebron?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Leaving aside the straw man of "so obviously Chet", you seem to be saying that LeBron led a team to the finals in his rookie season, which is just obviously not remotely true.

For the record, no hate on LeBron, but Chet may well end up having a more valuable rookie campaign than LeBron did because LeBron's rookie season really isn't that high of a par. It was super-impressive for a guy just out of high school, but he simply wasn't an all-star level guy yet.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
zero rings
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,573
And1: 2,715
Joined: Aug 10, 2023

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#426 » by zero rings » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:21 pm

GatorKid117 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:
This and other "insight" stating why Paolo is not as good as Chet has been the most hilariously ridiculous things I've read in quite some time.


You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.


https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/lineups?season=2023&seasontype=regseason&min_possessions=500#tab-four_factors

The Magic starters have a better point differential than OKCs....


That’s just one lineup, and not a lot of minutes compared to some of the others.

On the season Paolo has a -0.9 on court rating and a -10.4 on/off.

Franz is a little better at +1.4 and -1.5, respectively.

The Magic are consistently winning when guys like Isaac and Goga are on the court.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,903
And1: 15,064
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#427 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:22 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
zero rings wrote:
You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.
Lebron James net rating was -4.6 his rookie season, and they went to the Finals. In year 2, it was -1.2. In year 4, it was -5.9. So obviously, Chet will be better than Lebron?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Leaving aside the straw man of "so obviously Chet", you seem to be saying that LeBron led a team to the finals in his rookie season, which is just obviously not remotely true.

For the record, no hate on LeBron, but Chet may well end up having a more valuable rookie campaign than LeBron did because LeBron's rookie season really isn't that high of a par. It was super-impressive for a guy just out of high school, but he simply wasn't an all-star level guy yet.
He was an all-star his second season, and his net rating was less than Paolo's. It takes a while to learn to score when teams are loading up to stop you is the answer. What were the net rating of the players on your list when they were 21.1 years old?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
FrightCoward
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 349
Joined: May 18, 2022

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#428 » by FrightCoward » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:28 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:So, I realize that this is a thread comparing two guys, but I really want to speak to a point about Paulo being the first option.

While it's certainly harder to score efficiently at volume, that doesn't mean that the guy scoring at volume for a pretty-good team is carrying them.

The Magic are losing when Paolo is on the court, and doing a lot better when he's off of it. If the team wasn't so good with Paolo playing bench, literally no one would be even thinking about Paolo as an all-star candidate.

I don't hate Paolo. I'm not saying he sucks as a future foundation. But fundamentally we're talking about a guy who has the primacy he has because the Magic expect him to one day be a franchise player, not because them putting him in that position makes them a playoff team.

Let me also be clear: I'm not saying you could take a random bench guy on the Magic, give him Paolo's role and he'd do better. From an all-star perspective, it's simply a question of whether the team's record should lead us to overlook the fact that Paolo isn't actually producing eye-popping stats when you factor everything in the box score in on the grounds that he's having more impact than the box score says. And instead the indicators are that he's having less impact than his solid-but-not-amazing box score indicates.

Zooming out to the comparison: I do think it's hard to judge them confidently against each other right now because they are in different roles, and that at this point I don't think either of them lines up as a guy to get an all-star nod. There's no doubt that the presence of Shai is making Chet's life easier whereas Paolo's having to be the actual focal point of opposing defenses, and that's something I think about with Chet regardless of who he's being compared against.

But I'll also say that if I'm OKC I'm more confident about Chet's place in my future than I am if I'm Orlando with Paolo. Chet doesn't have to be my offensive alpha to fit with what I have, and his defense is just obviously nice.

For the Magic, were I them, I'd be thrilled at the improvement I see this year on the whole and expect I'd keep going with the plan I have...but I wouldn't delude myself into thinking I already have contender-level stars on my roster. Paolo & co needs to get better, and while that might seem like a "duh" statement, what I'm trying to convey is that the Magic record and seeding is making people look to give more credit to the anointed future star when really I think the story of the Magic this year is about the collective team lead by their coach.

This might sound like a skeptical take, but it potentially makes the team even more exciting. If they're this good while losing the Paolo minutes, imagine how good they'll be if he starts impacting like star.


So because of Cole, AB, Goga, Suggs the magic are the 4th best team in the east? I get everyone wanting to use Advanced stats, but watch the game and you'd see how ridiculous that sounds. Paolo has carried the team through a crazy amount of injuries over the past two months and we are still the 4th best team in the east.


When we say a team is winning with depth, we aren't saying that the backups are better than the starters, only that the team has a better rotation/bench than you'd expect given their overall quality - and yes that also means that starters/core is weaker than you'd expect given the overall quality. And this really isn't something that should seem crazy to anyone. It's literally true to an extent for just about half the teams in the league, there are top-heavy teams and there are deep teams. The Magic are the latter.

Let me put it to you like this. If we take the top 4 teams from both the East and West and look at their generally agreed upon stars for raw +/- - which speaks to how successful the team has been when they are on the court. Here's how it looks:

Jokic +328
Tatum +313
Shai +295
Kawhi +249
Embiid +247
Edwards +205
Giannis +187
Paolo -17

Clearly one of these things is not like the others. Maybe it seems unfair to compare Paolo to these other guys given their stature, but these guys do represent what you expect from the star of a Top 4 seed in the league at this time, and you can see that Paolo just doesn't fit.

I'm sorry man. I know you're excited about your young team and star, and I'm not saying you shouldn't be, but the fact is that this isn't a team having success by virtue of their alpha carrying them to this point in the season.


Those are also players who have been in the league for years, lol. What were their numbers halfway through their second season? Paolo’s numbers look better on the surface all the way around than Ant his second season.
DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,538
And1: 5,777
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#429 » by DCasey91 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:30 pm

Hoop Hunter wrote:I underestimated both players by a mile. I was so wrong. I thought Pachero would be a bust, wow how stupid. Was not very high on Chet either. Both have been so good.

I was right about Keegan Murray and Mathurin, both becoming good players. Maybe right about Ivey, didn't care for him, but it''s still a little to early, he could turn it around.


Chet had the game and then some just older, whereas Paolo had an amazing worth ethic as a youngster dropping what looked like 20 pounds

There was a video about him and that sold me straight away. Add to the fact he was legit humungous. Had him 1# pre draft but went back and forth (not the first time and certainly not the last)

Both are great not just basketball wise but their maturity levels are ahead of their peers.

;pp=ygUZUGFvbG8gYmFuY2hlcm8gc3RyZXRjaGluZw%3D%3D

Found it!
Li WenWen is the GOAT
zero rings
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,573
And1: 2,715
Joined: Aug 10, 2023

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#430 » by zero rings » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:30 pm

basketballRob wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Lebron James net rating was -4.6 his rookie season, and they went to the Finals. In year 2, it was -1.2. In year 4, it was -5.9. So obviously, Chet will be better than Lebron?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Leaving aside the straw man of "so obviously Chet", you seem to be saying that LeBron led a team to the finals in his rookie season, which is just obviously not remotely true.

For the record, no hate on LeBron, but Chet may well end up having a more valuable rookie campaign than LeBron did because LeBron's rookie season really isn't that high of a par. It was super-impressive for a guy just out of high school, but he simply wasn't an all-star level guy yet.
He was an all-star his second season, and his net rating was less than Paolo's. It takes a while to learn to score when teams are loading up to stop you is the answer. What were the net rating of the players on your list when they were 21.1 years old?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Rookie Lebron: -2.6 net, +2.2 on/off
Sophomore Lebron: +2.1 net, + 8.8 on/off

Not sure where you’re getting those numbers. Young Lebron crushes Paolo in terms of impact.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#431 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:31 pm

basketballRob wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Lebron James net rating was -4.6 his rookie season, and they went to the Finals. In year 2, it was -1.2. In year 4, it was -5.9. So obviously, Chet will be better than Lebron?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Leaving aside the straw man of "so obviously Chet", you seem to be saying that LeBron led a team to the finals in his rookie season, which is just obviously not remotely true.

For the record, no hate on LeBron, but Chet may well end up having a more valuable rookie campaign than LeBron did because LeBron's rookie season really isn't that high of a par. It was super-impressive for a guy just out of high school, but he simply wasn't an all-star level guy yet.
He was an all-star his second season, and his net rating was less than Paolo's. It takes a while to learn to score when teams are loading up to stop you is the answer. What were the net rating of the players on your list when they were 20.1 years old?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Hmm, I should have looked to ask you where you were getting your numbers the first time around because they look pretty out of whack.

According to bkref, LeBron has had a positive On every year after his rookie season, and a positive On/Off in every single season in his career. Where are you getting your data from?

Re: when they were 20.1 years old? Paolo's age has nothing to do with how good he is right now, which is what I was speaking to.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,903
And1: 15,064
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#432 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:32 pm

zero rings wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Leaving aside the straw man of "so obviously Chet", you seem to be saying that LeBron led a team to the finals in his rookie season, which is just obviously not remotely true.

For the record, no hate on LeBron, but Chet may well end up having a more valuable rookie campaign than LeBron did because LeBron's rookie season really isn't that high of a par. It was super-impressive for a guy just out of high school, but he simply wasn't an all-star level guy yet.
He was an all-star his second season, and his net rating was less than Paolo's. It takes a while to learn to score when teams are loading up to stop you is the answer. What were the net rating of the players on your list when they were 21.1 years old?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Rookie Lebron: -2.6 net, +2.2 on/off
Sophomore Lebron: +2.1 net, + 8.8 on/off

Not sure where you’re getting those numbers. Young Lebron crushes Paolo in terms of impact.
Look at the net ratings on NBA.com. Those aren't them, and no one uses basketball reference for net ratings.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#433 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:33 pm

FrightCoward wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
OrlMagic05 wrote:
So because of Cole, AB, Goga, Suggs the magic are the 4th best team in the east? I get everyone wanting to use Advanced stats, but watch the game and you'd see how ridiculous that sounds. Paolo has carried the team through a crazy amount of injuries over the past two months and we are still the 4th best team in the east.


When we say a team is winning with depth, we aren't saying that the backups are better than the starters, only that the team has a better rotation/bench than you'd expect given their overall quality - and yes that also means that starters/core is weaker than you'd expect given the overall quality. And this really isn't something that should seem crazy to anyone. It's literally true to an extent for just about half the teams in the league, there are top-heavy teams and there are deep teams. The Magic are the latter.

Let me put it to you like this. If we take the top 4 teams from both the East and West and look at their generally agreed upon stars for raw +/- - which speaks to how successful the team has been when they are on the court. Here's how it looks:

Jokic +328
Tatum +313
Shai +295
Kawhi +249
Embiid +247
Edwards +205
Giannis +187
Paolo -17

Clearly one of these things is not like the others. Maybe it seems unfair to compare Paolo to these other guys given their stature, but these guys do represent what you expect from the star of a Top 4 seed in the league at this time, and you can see that Paolo just doesn't fit.

I'm sorry man. I know you're excited about your young team and star, and I'm not saying you shouldn't be, but the fact is that this isn't a team having success by virtue of their alpha carrying them to this point in the season.


Those are also players who have been in the league for years, lol. What were their numbers halfway through their second season? Paolo’s numbers look better on the surface all the way around than Ant his second season.


Pay attention to context. I've taken pains to say that I'm not bashing Paolo's potential, I'm just correcting the notion that he is currently dragging his team to a high seed.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,903
And1: 15,064
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#434 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:35 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
FrightCoward wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
When we say a team is winning with depth, we aren't saying that the backups are better than the starters, only that the team has a better rotation/bench than you'd expect given their overall quality - and yes that also means that starters/core is weaker than you'd expect given the overall quality. And this really isn't something that should seem crazy to anyone. It's literally true to an extent for just about half the teams in the league, there are top-heavy teams and there are deep teams. The Magic are the latter.

Let me put it to you like this. If we take the top 4 teams from both the East and West and look at their generally agreed upon stars for raw +/- - which speaks to how successful the team has been when they are on the court. Here's how it looks:

Jokic +328
Tatum +313
Shai +295
Kawhi +249
Embiid +247
Edwards +205
Giannis +187
Paolo -17

Clearly one of these things is not like the others. Maybe it seems unfair to compare Paolo to these other guys given their stature, but these guys do represent what you expect from the star of a Top 4 seed in the league at this time, and you can see that Paolo just doesn't fit.

I'm sorry man. I know you're excited about your young team and star, and I'm not saying you shouldn't be, but the fact is that this isn't a team having success by virtue of their alpha carrying them to this point in the season.


Those are also players who have been in the league for years, lol. What were their numbers halfway through their second season? Paolo’s numbers look better on the surface all the way around than Ant his second season.


Pay attention to context. I've taken pains to say that I'm not bashing Paolo's potential, I'm just correcting the notion that he is currently dragging his team to a high seed.
Pay attention you aren't getting your stats from NBA.com, and that's what we go by here.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#435 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:37 pm

basketballRob wrote:
zero rings wrote:
basketballRob wrote:He was an all-star his second season, and his net rating was less than Paolo's. It takes a while to learn to score when teams are loading up to stop you is the answer. What were the net rating of the players on your list when they were 21.1 years old?

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Rookie Lebron: -2.6 net, +2.2 on/off
Sophomore Lebron: +2.1 net, + 8.8 on/off

Not sure where you’re getting those numbers. Young Lebron crushes Paolo in terms of impact.
Look at the net ratings on NBA.com. Those aren't them, and no one uses basketball reference for net ratings.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


His nba.com numbers look pretty close to the bkref numbers, but I think I see the problem:

You were looking at his pre-season numbers rather than his regular season numbers.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,903
And1: 15,064
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#436 » by basketballRob » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:40 pm

Lebron was -on off his 3rd season.
User avatar
madmaxmedia
RealGM
Posts: 12,604
And1: 7,528
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: SoCal
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#437 » by madmaxmedia » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:43 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
zero rings wrote:
Rookie Lebron: -2.6 net, +2.2 on/off
Sophomore Lebron: +2.1 net, + 8.8 on/off

Not sure where you’re getting those numbers. Young Lebron crushes Paolo in terms of impact.
Look at the net ratings on NBA.com. Those aren't them, and no one uses basketball reference for net ratings.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


His nba.com numbers look pretty close to the bkref numbers, but I think I see the problem:

You were looking at his pre-season numbers rather than his regular season numbers.


Pre-season NBA.com numbers, that's what we go by here.
zero rings
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,573
And1: 2,715
Joined: Aug 10, 2023

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#438 » by zero rings » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:45 pm

basketballRob wrote:Lebron was -on off his 3rd season.


You’re doing something wrong my guy. The bbref numbers are correct
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Safe to say, Chet 

Post#439 » by Doctor MJ » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:47 pm

basketballRob wrote:Pay attention you aren't getting your stats from NBA.com, and that's what we go by here.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


Dude, you just confused the pre-season for the regular season. I was going to avoid rubbing your nose into it, but you're being snotty about it you need to feel some consequences.

Here's the #1 thing: Common sense should have told you that the data you were looking at made no sense. By sharing this data and being so snotty you showed not only that you made the beginner navigation mistake, but that you weren't really able to think this stuff through on your own.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
GatorKid117
Sophomore
Posts: 142
And1: 63
Joined: Oct 30, 2009
Location: UF

Re: Safe to say, Chet "Hologram" Holgrem > Paolo Banchero 

Post#440 » by GatorKid117 » Mon Jan 8, 2024 11:47 pm

zero rings wrote:
GatorKid117 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
You can scoff all you want. It’s what has actually happened on the court. The Magic’s bench mob has been outstanding and their starters, particularly Paolo, have struggled to win their minutes.


https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/lineups?season=2023&seasontype=regseason&min_possessions=500#tab-four_factors

The Magic starters have a better point differential than OKCs....


That’s just one lineup, and not a lot of minutes compared to some of the others.

On the season Paolo has a -0.9 on court rating and a -10.4 on/off.

Franz is a little better at +1.4 and -1.5, respectively.

The Magic are consistently winning when guys like Isaac and Goga are on the court.


It is just one lineup... The starting lineup which you brought up and were trying to downplay to make a point.

Those Paolo stats are irrelevant to what you were trying to sell.

Return to The General Board