BliscoSantos wrote:joesha1698 wrote:ozwizard8 wrote:The sad reality is Kyrie's trade worth. If you go around different fan bases and their forums, you can see that almost no one would accept Kyrie even if Mavs sent picks with him.
If Mavs had KAT-Lively frontcourt, I bet Luka would complain a lot less. Luka's frustration is due to Losses. It is not an easy transition from Real Madrid to here. Its not easy to digest to Mavs becoming borderline playoff team. This team used to be a lock for playoffs. Luka-Brunson-DFS-Dinwiddie roster made WCF.
I know the Lakers would accept Kyrie and I highly doubt Lakers fan would not. Kyrie is weapon X. You keep him and unleash him in the playoffs. If the Lakers could get Kyrie with AD and Lebron (and keep most of their defensive depth) they would be championship contenders.
Luka's frustration is due to immaturity. He's 24 years old and needs to grow up and act like a real leader. If Brunson liked playing with Luka so much he would have done more to stay. As for DFS and Dinwiddie - having tall/athletic guys who can play defense/handle the ball/ score is very important in this every so tall league. That was the price the front office paid to get Kyrie after losing Brunson. The logic is that its harder to replace a Brunson and easier to get two guys like Dinwiddie and DFS in the future. That logic is sound - as long as the front office does what it needs to do.
Dinwiddie a good defender...you must be kidding...he was a bad defender,only thing he had on Kai was size...People really don't give Kyrie enough credit on D... he's a good defender, he's just small...he has troubles against stronger,bigger guards...his D on Steph and similar PG is good
Agree.
Dinwiddie is a bad defender and Brunson can't guard a chair... People forget too early
Kyrie is decent but he is small.
Exum-Irving are the supercharger version of Dinwiddie-Brunson.

















