VooDoo7 wrote:And if you're Giannis, have the **** brains to pass the ball up the court. When they're about to foul you.
He wants to get fouled, his ego gets the best of him too much.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
VooDoo7 wrote:And if you're Giannis, have the **** brains to pass the ball up the court. When they're about to foul you.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
Wooderson wrote:Doc uses both TOs to draw up 3 pointers down 1. Leaving the Bucks with no TOs in a foul and chase game to get the ball at halfcourt. Baffling game management.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
MikeIsGood wrote:Inbounding to Giannis is a choice.
BroncoBuck wrote:Wooderson wrote:Doc uses both TOs to draw up 3 pointers down 1. Leaving the Bucks with no TOs in a foul and chase game to get the ball at halfcourt. Baffling game management.
The first one makes sense if Brook doesn’t yolo the shot. Brook had time to make another pass.
Turk Nowitzki wrote:VooDoo7 wrote:And if you're Giannis, have the **** brains to pass the ball up the court. When they're about to foul you.
He wants to get fouled, his ego gets the best of him too much.
Siefer wrote:Dame went straight to inbound that. That was all on purpose. What the hell are they thinking?
RiotPunch wrote:Like, did we not know they were in the bonus? Having Dame inbound for the give and go works in theory if the other team can't just put your worst foul shooter on the line to ice the damn game.
BroncoBuck wrote:Wooderson wrote:Doc uses both TOs to draw up 3 pointers down 1. Leaving the Bucks with no TOs in a foul and chase game to get the ball at halfcourt. Baffling game management.
The first one makes sense if Brook doesn’t yolo the shot. Brook had time to make another pass.
RiotPunch wrote:Like, did we not know they were in the bonus? Having Dame inbound for the give and go works in theory if the other team can't just put your worst foul shooter on the line to ice the damn game.