[WOJ] Daniel Gafford to Dallas (Richaun Holmes and picks)

balsamic_ducks · Post #21 » by **balsamic_ducks** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:41 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Stein saying Dallas has to go get draft compensation elsewhere to do this lol. Dallas is so bad.

So washington is telling to mavs to go find a 1st.

What are they sending out to get that 1st?

Swaps to OKC for one of their many 1st?

Post #22 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:42 pm

Guessing OKC 2nd worst 2024 1st for 2028 Dallas swap

JMAC3 · Post #23 » by **JMAC3** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:42 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Stein saying Dallas has to go get draft compensation elsewhere to do this lol. Dallas is so bad.

What does that even mean haha

CallMeKahn · Post #24 » by **CallMeKahn** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:43 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:Stein saying Dallas has to go get draft compensation elsewhere to do this lol. Dallas is so bad.

Yeah, I was to ask on that. Hard to believe Dallas would swing this without having the pick in the pipe, but things never cease to amaze me.

Post #25 » by **Domejandro** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:43 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:Stein saying Dallas has to go get draft compensation elsewhere to do this lol. Dallas is so bad.

What does that even mean haha

Dallas pulled up to the cashier with a check they couldn't cash. Gotta take out a quick payday loan. :lol:

Post #26 » by **Texas Chuck** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:48 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Guessing OKC 2nd worst 2024 1st for 2028 Dallas swap

Stein saying OKC is giving Dallas the pick, so maybe?

realEAST · Post #27 » by **realEAST** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:49 pm

Obviously, pick compensation will decide how good of a deal this is (but if it really is Prosper + 2nd, I think it is good value for Mavs), but can it be that Mavs are going to have respectable (dare I say, really good) big men rotation after... I don't even know how long

Post #28 » by **Texas Chuck** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:49 pm

But Dallas is just a different team with Lively on the court and not. If Gafford provides similar things, and he should, this is a nice basketball addition. Just scared about the cost.

Captain_Obvious · Post #29 » by **Captain_Obvious** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:50 pm

OKC decides

Post #30 » by **Texas Chuck** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:50 pm

realEAST wrote:Obviously, pick compensation will decide how good of a deal this is (but if it really is Prosper + 2nd, I think it is good value for Mavs), but can it be that Mavs are going to have respectable (dare I say, really good) big men rotation after... I don't even know how long

Chandler/Haywood/Ian probably.

Apz · Post #31 » by **Apz** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:55 pm

Dont think okc want prosper, think they want more of a win now player. Might actually be a guy like kleber which would be sad

JMAC3 · Post #32 » by **JMAC3** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:56 pm

Wonder if Hornets/OKC deal gets worked into this, Charlotte takes on salary from 1 of those teams to make the Hayward deal legal.

Post #33 » by **165bows** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 4:59 pm

Boston trading their first for 4-5 future seconds has been pretty high on the list for a bit so that’s a possibility.

Devilanche · Post #34 » by **Devilanche** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:05 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Guessing OKC 2nd worst 2024 1st for 2028 Dallas swap

Stein saying OKC is giving Dallas the pick, so maybe?

Some bigger deal to make OKC salary works outgoing work ?

And why is OKC not just trying get gafford

jayjaysee · Post #35 » by **jayjaysee** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:09 pm

Yeah, if this is Prosper+toronto 2nd for a late first and then add another 2nd to get Gafford.. I love it.

I don’t even hate giving up the 2028 swap as the firsts this offseason will still be “clean” (25/27/31)..

I love the target though. Gafford is a great fit and will hold his value on that contract.

jayjaysee · Post #36 » by **jayjaysee** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:09 pm

Devilanche wrote:
And why is OKC not just trying get gafford

I will never understand this. OKC is so good this season.. Just do something real

Devilanche · Post #37 » by **Devilanche** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:10 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
Devilanche wrote:
And why is OKC not just trying get gafford

I will never understand this. OKC is so good this season.. Just do something real

I don’t know man . I really don’t know.
If Dallas is buying , it has to be cheap enough for OKC .

giberish · Post #38 » by **giberish** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:12 pm

I feel that value-wise this has to be a late 1st. Dallas got a 1st for taking Holmes to begin with and Gafford has a little value as well.

jayjaysee · Post #39 » by **jayjaysee** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:18 pm

Devilanche wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
Devilanche wrote:
And why is OKC not just trying get gafford

I will never understand this. OKC is so good this season.. Just do something real

I don’t know man . I really don’t know.
If Dallas is buying , it has to be cheap enough for OKC .

Yeah I agree completely. I’m sorry if it came off as if I wasn’t.. OKC should be trying to win finals this year. They should’ve traded for Pascal. And now should’ve traded for Gafford.

And any more deals that involve an impact big… I’m going to say they should’ve traded for them..

Devilanche · Post #40 » by **Devilanche** » Thu Feb 8, 2024 5:23 pm

jayjaysee wrote:
Devilanche wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:
I will never understand this. OKC is so good this season.. Just do something real

I don’t know man . I really don’t know.
If Dallas is buying , it has to be cheap enough for OKC .

Yeah I agree completely. I’m sorry if it came off as if I wasn’t.. OKC should be trying to win finals this year. They should’ve traded for Pascal. And now should’ve traded for Gafford.

And any more deals that involve an impact big… I’m going to say they should’ve traded for them..

Don’t be sorry, I think you are saying the same thing as pretty much all of us .
Ignoring pascal , pretty much Olynyk or gafford would have helped.

To the bolded, if I happen to read it I will agree.