Skybox wrote:I’m not getting this whole idea that the problem is whether or not AB should “earn” Fultz’ minutes…the FO should not be limited by those choices. Fultz beating AB up & down the practice court doesn’t make him a good enough PG to lead this team. By the same token, AB, even as #6 draft choice, has no claim to the job.
DOESNT MATTER…NEITHER ONE IS GOOD ENOUGH
Why is our menu limited to these two choices? We should have upgraded, either marginally (Tyus or Monte), significantly (Brogdon), or tremendously (Murray). It’s malpractice by Weltman.
Fultz isn’t getting better. Black probably will…so keep him. Fultz should have been trade filler, but now he’s the best bad PG on the team, so play him because we’re a playoff team. He should be a buyout candidate, not a starting option…but they did nothing - and they’ll probably re-sign him because AB may not have earned the starting job by the time the playoff whooping is over.
I like this framing. Honestly though, I think the "marginal" upgrade wasn't worth the disruption, the "significant" upgrade was frowned on because it blocks AB, and the "tremendous" upgrade was rejected because it takes the ball out of the hands of Paolo and Franz.

























