All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Who wins?

All Prime 2017 Warriors
24
92%
All Prime 2011 Mavs
2
8%
 
Total votes: 26

rand
Analyst
Posts: 3,033
And1: 3,955
Joined: Jun 28, 2013

All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#1 » by rand » Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:10 am

Who would win a best of 7, the 2017 Warriors or the 2011 Mavs with all players in their prime and 2017 RC as Mavs coach?

All-Prime 2017 Warriors
Steph Curry / Shaun Livingston
Klay Thompson / Ian Clark / Patrick McCaw
Kevin Durant / Andre Iguodala
Draymond Green / David West
Zaza Pachulia / JaVale McGee / Damian Jones

All-Prime 2011 Mavs
Jason Kidd / JJ Barea
DeShawn Stevenson / Jason Terry
Shawn Marion / Caron Butler / Corey Brewer
Dirk Nowitzki / Peja Stojakovic / Brian Cardinal
Tyson Chandler / Brendan Haywood
lessthanjake
Analyst
Posts: 3,076
And1: 2,816
Joined: Apr 13, 2013

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#2 » by lessthanjake » Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:32 pm

This is actually an interesting question, given how many good players the 2011 Mavs had that weren’t actually in their prime at the time. That said, I’d still go with the 2017 Warriors. The biggest difference for an all-prime 2011 Mavs would be having prime Kidd instead of old Kidd. But I’m just not that high on Kidd in general (due primarily to his lack of scoring ability/efficiency), so that doesn’t move the needle for me as much as it might for others.
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
User avatar
AdagioPace
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,875
And1: 7,421
Joined: Jan 03, 2017
Location: Contado di Molise
   

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#3 » by AdagioPace » Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:04 pm

interestingly Warriors don't get much better. Not only stacked but also disgustingly synchronized.
Mavs stand no chance
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes
User avatar
LA Bird
Analyst
Posts: 3,605
And1: 3,364
Joined: Feb 16, 2015

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#4 » by LA Bird » Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:17 pm

2017 Warriors win comfortably since they are better on both ends of the floor. The Mavs do have one more All Star level player but the 7th man on either teams isn't going to bring that big of a difference and the Warriors more than make up for it with 3 of the 4 best peaks anyway.
Special_Puppy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,906
And1: 2,625
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#5 » by Special_Puppy » Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:48 pm

More interesting question is 2017 Warriors vs 2016 Spurs all in their prime
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,224
And1: 26,102
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#6 » by Clyde Frazier » Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:08 pm

I'd be rooting for the mavs but still don't think you can top the duo of curry + durant with those supporting players all in their prime.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,369
And1: 98,213
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#7 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:03 pm

LA Bird wrote:2017 Warriors win comfortably since they are better on both ends of the floor. The Mavs do have one more All Star level player but the 7th man on either teams isn't going to bring that big of a difference and the Warriors more than make up for it with 3 of the 4 best peaks anyway.
5 more Allstar players, right? Kidd, Juice, Matrix, Peja, and Haywood. Not sure how you calculated one.

Edit. My bad, you mean one more than the Warriors not one more than the real life Mavs. Which is super obvious lol.

Obviously the Warriors are a paper favorite because all the key guys were in their prime IRL so we know it works. Mavs require way more guess work. Gotta take the known elite team here.

But in theory that Mavs team is stacked. And so deep allowing for very aggressive defense and playing super fast.

Sent from my SM-A136U using RealGM mobile app
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
CodeBreaker
Head Coach
Posts: 6,246
And1: 5,938
Joined: Jul 21, 2017
 

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#8 » by CodeBreaker » Thu Feb 15, 2024 7:43 am

Warriors sweep
Image
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,367
And1: 18,767
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#9 » by homecourtloss » Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:30 pm

AdagioPace wrote:interestingly Warriors don't get much better. Not only stacked but also disgustingly synchronized.
Mavs stand no chance


This is something that’s always so noticeable whenever these types of hypotheticals pop up—the 2017 Warriors AS IS were as good as other hypothetical “prime/peak” versions of other teams.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,367
And1: 18,767
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#10 » by homecourtloss » Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:38 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
LA Bird wrote:2017 Warriors win comfortably since they are better on both ends of the floor. The Mavs do have one more All Star level player but the 7th man on either teams isn't going to bring that big of a difference and the Warriors more than make up for it with 3 of the 4 best peaks anyway.
5 more Allstar players, right? Kidd, Juice, Matrix, Peja, and Haywood. Not sure how you calculated one.

Edit. My bad, you mean one more than the Warriors not one more than the real life Mavs. Which is super obvious lol.

Obviously the Warriors are a paper favorite because all the key guys were in their prime IRL so we know it works. Mavs require way more guess work. Gotta take the known elite team here.

But in theory that Mavs team is stacked. And so deep allowing for very aggressive defense and playing super fast.

Sent from my SM-A136U using RealGM mobile app


I think that in general when you get super-talented sides playing each other with not many discernible weaknesses but with a plethora of strengths as is the case in these hypotheticals, the games are pretty much 50-50 toss ups. With that said, this hypothetical with the Mavs has an impact monster Kidd but that same peak version of Kidd isn’t a shooter, which would put this Mavs team at a big disadvantage against the 2017 Warriors.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Warriors Analyst
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,868
And1: 2,704
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: All Prime: 2017 Warriors vs 2011 Mavs 

Post#11 » by Warriors Analyst » Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:10 am

rand wrote:Who would win a best of 7, the 2017 Warriors or the 2011 Mavs with all players in their prime and 2017 RC as Mavs coach?

All-Prime 2017 Warriors
Steph Curry / Shaun Livingston
Klay Thompson / Ian Clark / Patrick McCaw
Kevin Durant / Andre Iguodala
Draymond Green / David West
Zaza Pachulia / JaVale McGee / Damian Jones

All-Prime 2011 Mavs
Jason Kidd / JJ Barea
DeShawn Stevenson / Jason Terry
Shawn Marion / Caron Butler / Corey Brewer
Dirk Nowitzki / Peja Stojakovic / Brian Cardinal
Tyson Chandler / Brendan Haywood


I'd have KEvon Looney there instead of Jones, who is barely an NBA player.

Return to Player Comparisons