PhilBlackson wrote:Boyz N The Hood told me the trades made no difference, we’ll keep our pick and that “you don’t know basketball” if you think differently. Interesting lol
Masai's trades made no difference? So he thinks Masai makes no difference?
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
PhilBlackson wrote:Boyz N The Hood told me the trades made no difference, we’ll keep our pick and that “you don’t know basketball” if you think differently. Interesting lol
ItsDanger wrote:Best hope is to land a high upside guy in '25 draft at this point. Looks deep enough that a pick in 11-15 range could still do it.
DelAbbot wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Best hope is to land a high upside guy in '25 draft at this point. Looks deep enough that a pick in 11-15 range could still do it.
They will go for it next year, and run a repeat of 2021/2022. The similarities are striking
OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.

DelAbbot wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.
OakleyDokely wrote:DelAbbot wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.
If our young guys fail bigly, we will get a very good pick. Not sure that's a positive thing though.
They might just lose a lot of games because of youth and experience, but it's still important all these guys show growth, otherwise you become DET and WAS.

OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.
Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:DelAbbot wrote:
If our young guys fail bigly, we will get a very good pick. Not sure that's a positive thing though.
They might just lose a lot of games because of youth and experience, but it's still important all these guys show growth, otherwise you become DET and WAS.
I think what he is trying to say is that them getting good enough is a problem. The team lacks high end talent, and RJ/IQ are not predicted to turn into ALL NBA level players, so if they end up good enough to push us into first round exit territory, you end up with a mid pick, that in most cases becomes a mid player, and the cycle continues.
It's why a large portion of people wanted a hard tank for a year or two to get shots at top flight talent. If the team steadily improves, that is not in the cards, which can lead to treadmilling. Hence the "feelings of 2021/22" comment.
The last time Masai saw even a glimmer of hope he doubled down on a bad team.
DelAbbot wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.
ArthurVandelay wrote:DelAbbot wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.
2014-2019 disagrees
Steady development of players
Acquire assets
Be opportunistic
Patience
It’s like people forget the recipe from the last time. Further proof that people never learn from history and people never change.
DelAbbot wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:DelAbbot wrote:
2014-2019 disagrees
Steady development of players
Acquire assets
Be opportunistic
Patience
It’s like people forget the recipe from the last time. Further proof that people never learn from history and people never change.
You are not framing this correctly.. Look at OKC, they reset hard and got Jalen Williams and Chet through draft as high end prospects.
The 2014-2019 only got that high end player Kawhi on a rental - and it was a once a decade heist. Gasol was also gettable that year because he's in the final decline years - we accumulated lots of CHEAP (valuable) assets and sold them for a single push for championship. Now we have assets who are on their 2nd or 3rd contracts (not CHEAP/as valuable), and besides Barnes no one has the high potential as Kawhi or Lowry.
This book title expresses how I view this team - it's going to be good (enough for 1st round) but has a definite ceiling - and it's being good will delude Masai to go for compete too early again and cause us to fall short of great
OakleyDokely wrote:Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
If our young guys fail bigly, we will get a very good pick. Not sure that's a positive thing though.
They might just lose a lot of games because of youth and experience, but it's still important all these guys show growth, otherwise you become DET and WAS.
I think what he is trying to say is that them getting good enough is a problem. The team lacks high end talent, and RJ/IQ are not predicted to turn into ALL NBA level players, so if they end up good enough to push us into first round exit territory, you end up with a mid pick, that in most cases becomes a mid player, and the cycle continues.
It's why a large portion of people wanted a hard tank for a year or two to get shots at top flight talent. If the team steadily improves, that is not in the cards, which can lead to treadmilling. Hence the "feelings of 2021/22" comment.
The last time Masai saw even a glimmer of hope he doubled down on a bad team.
But they aren't good yet. They're 22-36 and currently sitting 7th last. You can collect assets while still maintaining a quality draft position. As long as they don't go out and start adding big money, big minute vets and play them ahead of the young guys.
In terms of this current draft, I doubt you'd be getting a prospect that ends up much better than IQ or Barrett. Even if the Raps land the #1 pick, which elite talent would they be adding? They'd add a good prospect for sure, but chances are, that player isn't going to be a high end, all-nba talent. There isn't a Wemby or even a Zion in this draft class.
ArthurVandelay wrote:DelAbbot wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:If the Raps are any good next year it's because their existing young guys and their incoming rookies took a big step forward. The only real "vets" left in the rotation are the Cs. It's going to come down to how well Barnes, IQ, Barrett, Dick, Ochai, the rookies play.
2014-2019 disagrees
Steady development of players
Acquire assets
Be opportunistic
Patience
It’s like people forget the recipe from the last time. Further proof that people never learn from history and people never change.

Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Scase wrote:I think what he is trying to say is that them getting good enough is a problem. The team lacks high end talent, and RJ/IQ are not predicted to turn into ALL NBA level players, so if they end up good enough to push us into first round exit territory, you end up with a mid pick, that in most cases becomes a mid player, and the cycle continues.
It's why a large portion of people wanted a hard tank for a year or two to get shots at top flight talent. If the team steadily improves, that is not in the cards, which can lead to treadmilling. Hence the "feelings of 2021/22" comment.
The last time Masai saw even a glimmer of hope he doubled down on a bad team.
But they aren't good yet. They're 22-36 and currently sitting 7th last. You can collect assets while still maintaining a quality draft position. As long as they don't go out and start adding big money, big minute vets and play them ahead of the young guys.
In terms of this current draft, I doubt you'd be getting a prospect that ends up much better than IQ or Barrett. Even if the Raps land the #1 pick, which elite talent would they be adding? They'd add a good prospect for sure, but chances are, that player isn't going to be a high end, all-nba talent. There isn't a Wemby or even a Zion in this draft class.
Adding another IQ/RJ level player is still a good thing though, it's how we ended up making the trades for the chip. You get enough good talent level players, and you condense them into higher level talent.
Pushing for a play in spot after blowing the team up in the same year isn't exactly a recipe for success.
OakleyDokely wrote:Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
But they aren't good yet. They're 22-36 and currently sitting 7th last. You can collect assets while still maintaining a quality draft position. As long as they don't go out and start adding big money, big minute vets and play them ahead of the young guys.
In terms of this current draft, I doubt you'd be getting a prospect that ends up much better than IQ or Barrett. Even if the Raps land the #1 pick, which elite talent would they be adding? They'd add a good prospect for sure, but chances are, that player isn't going to be a high end, all-nba talent. There isn't a Wemby or even a Zion in this draft class.
Adding another IQ/RJ level player is still a good thing though, it's how we ended up making the trades for the chip. You get enough good talent level players, and you condense them into higher level talent.
Pushing for a play in spot after blowing the team up in the same year isn't exactly a recipe for success.
I don't see it as them pushing for the play-in though. Since the OG trade, the team is 10-16, which is a 50 loss team. If they held onto OG or Siakam, that would be a push for the play-in direction. 6 of the 9 guys they played last night are 25 or younger, they aren't built to win consistently right now.

Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Scase wrote:Adding another IQ/RJ level player is still a good thing though, it's how we ended up making the trades for the chip. You get enough good talent level players, and you condense them into higher level talent.
Pushing for a play in spot after blowing the team up in the same year isn't exactly a recipe for success.
I don't see it as them pushing for the play-in though. Since the OG trade, the team is 10-16, which is a 50 loss team. If they held onto OG or Siakam, that would be a push for the play-in direction. 6 of the 9 guys they played last night are 25 or younger, they aren't built to win consistently right now.
Keeping brown and picking up KO/keeping Jak, coupled with how Masai has handled this type of situation in the past, is enough evidence I need to assume it's groundhog day.
Maybe I'm wrong, and I would be happy to be, but I am just not seeing it.
Scase wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:Scase wrote:Adding another IQ/RJ level player is still a good thing though, it's how we ended up making the trades for the chip. You get enough good talent level players, and you condense them into higher level talent.
Pushing for a play in spot after blowing the team up in the same year isn't exactly a recipe for success.
I don't see it as them pushing for the play-in though. Since the OG trade, the team is 10-16, which is a 50 loss team. If they held onto OG or Siakam, that would be a push for the play-in direction. 6 of the 9 guys they played last night are 25 or younger, they aren't built to win consistently right now.
Keeping brown and picking up KO/keeping Jak, coupled with how Masai has handled this type of situation in the past, is enough evidence I need to assume it's groundhog day.
Maybe I'm wrong, and I would be happy to be, but I am just not seeing it.
DelAbbot wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:DelAbbot wrote:
2014-2019 disagrees
Steady development of players
Acquire assets
Be opportunistic
Patience
It’s like people forget the recipe from the last time. Further proof that people never learn from history and people never change.
You are not framing this correctly.. Look at OKC, they reset hard and got Jalen Williams and Chet through draft as high end prospects.
The 2014-2019 only got that high end player Kawhi on a rental - and it was a once a decade heist. Gasol was also gettable that year because he's in the final decline years - we accumulated lots of CHEAP (valuable) assets and sold them for a single push for championship. Now we have assets who are on their 2nd or 3rd contracts (not CHEAP/as valuable), and besides Barnes no one has the high potential as Kawhi or Lowry.
This book title expresses how I view this team - it's going to be good (enough for 1st round) but has a definite ceiling - and it's being good will delude Masai to go for compete too early again and cause us to fall short of great
OakleyDokely wrote:DelAbbot wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:
2014-2019 disagrees
Steady development of players
Acquire assets
Be opportunistic
Patience
It’s like people forget the recipe from the last time. Further proof that people never learn from history and people never change.
You are not framing this correctly.. Look at OKC, they reset hard and got Jalen Williams and Chet through draft as high end prospects.
The 2014-2019 only got that high end player Kawhi on a rental - and it was a once a decade heist. Gasol was also gettable that year because he's in the final decline years - we accumulated lots of CHEAP (valuable) assets and sold them for a single push for championship. Now we have assets who are on their 2nd or 3rd contracts (not CHEAP/as valuable), and besides Barnes no one has the high potential as Kawhi or Lowry.
This book title expresses how I view this team - it's going to be good (enough for 1st round) but has a definite ceiling - and it's being good will delude Masai to go for compete too early again and cause us to fall short of great
Williams was taken 12th though. That's just good drafting. And their best player Shai was acquired via trade and he was also drafted outside the top 10. Only Chet was used with a high pick.