March Madness Discussion (Men's Nat'l Championship Game: Mon 4/8: Purdue vs UCONN)
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
Mephariel
- Starter
- Posts: 2,122
- And1: 2,226
- Joined: Jun 24, 2018
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
The lack of point guard attack at the college level is just astonishing. Maybe because I am use to watching Fox, but there is zero attack ability to run a play to penetrate the defense.
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- ___Rand___
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,324
- And1: 13,855
- Joined: Feb 26, 2017
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Mephariel wrote:The lack of point guard attack at the college level is just astonishing. Maybe because I am use to watching Fox, but there is zero attack ability to run a play to penetrate the defense.
women's you mean.

Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
Mephariel
- Starter
- Posts: 2,122
- And1: 2,226
- Joined: Jun 24, 2018
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
___Rand___ wrote:Mephariel wrote:The lack of point guard attack at the college level is just astonishing. Maybe because I am use to watching Fox, but there is zero attack ability to run a play to penetrate the defense.
women's you mean.
Even a lot of the men's team. Lebron and JJ Reddick sort of touch on this in their podcast. They love to feed the post even when there is no opportunity to score in the post. The pick and roll plays are way behind the NBA.
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- Clyde Frazier
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 20,248
- And1: 26,130
- Joined: Sep 07, 2010
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- wojoaderge
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,102
- And1: 1,689
- Joined: Jul 27, 2015
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Clyde Frazier wrote:
What does "created" mean?
"Coach, why don't you just relax? We're not good enough to beat the Lakers. We've had a great year, why don't you just relax and cool down?"
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
theforumblue
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,136
- And1: 5,334
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
Patches Perry
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,421
- And1: 18,736
- Joined: May 11, 2016
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Juju Watkins is really good. Great agility, footwork and handle.
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
Lockdown504090
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,905
- And1: 12,762
- Joined: Nov 24, 2015
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Mephariel wrote:The lack of point guard attack at the college level is just astonishing. Maybe because I am use to watching Fox, but there is zero attack ability to run a play to penetrate the defense.
The gap between short range burst in women’s basketball isn’t as wide as it is in men’s hoop, it’s easier to defend without fouling than in the nba, there less spacing, and they don’t have a culture of being too cool to defend the ball
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- azcatz11
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,532
- And1: 35,185
- Joined: Apr 13, 2017
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
So what happened to UConn? Did they just stop getting all the top players? Why is that? Obviously they’re still good but they used to never lose a game
Praying for Burrow
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- Mk0
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,694
- And1: 21,670
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
wojoaderge wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:
What does "created" mean?
She scored 41 and had 12 assists. Basically everything they did was centered around her, I think they just worded it oddly.
I AM A BUSINESS MAN NOW
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
theforumblue
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,136
- And1: 5,334
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
juju got things to learn but man, her game is smooth.
screw these absolute garbage refs
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- Mk0
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,694
- And1: 21,670
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
USC couldn't do jack against Bueckers as she closed them out. That was rough.
I AM A BUSINESS MAN NOW
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- Mk0
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,694
- And1: 21,670
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Dumb foul and Juju is gonna get another 2 FTs. USC needs a steal here.
Or you can foul a 67% FT shooter! Not a bad break there.
Or you can foul a 67% FT shooter! Not a bad break there.
I AM A BUSINESS MAN NOW
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
JustBuzzin
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,341
- And1: 13,809
- Joined: Jun 10, 2023
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Juju a freshman and was the only one crying after the game.
She got that DAWG in her. She will be the face of women's college basketball after Clark heads to the WNBA.
She got that DAWG in her. She will be the face of women's college basketball after Clark heads to the WNBA.
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- ___Rand___
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,324
- And1: 13,855
- Joined: Feb 26, 2017
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Mephariel wrote:___Rand___ wrote:Mephariel wrote:The lack of point guard attack at the college level is just astonishing. Maybe because I am use to watching Fox, but there is zero attack ability to run a play to penetrate the defense.
women's you mean.
Even a lot of the men's team. Lebron and JJ Reddick sort of touch on this in their podcast. They love to feed the post even when there is no opportunity to score in the post. The pick and roll plays are way behind the NBA.
Women's is much more glaring. But their skill levels are much lower overall so that's what's astounding about Caitlin's passing ability and BBIQ who's equals top men players IMO.
But I digress. Well if we are to think, even in the NBA quality point guards are short in supply. Lots of teams make do without a point guard.

Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- ___Rand___
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,324
- And1: 13,855
- Joined: Feb 26, 2017
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
There's no spacing with the USC women's team. I guess there aren't that many shooters in women's game.

Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- Clyde Frazier
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 20,248
- And1: 26,130
- Joined: Sep 07, 2010
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
wojoaderge wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:
What does "created" mean?
I'm not positive. It could be passes that led to free throws or hockey assists.
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- TheSuzerain
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,412
- And1: 11,413
- Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
azcatz11 wrote:___Rand___ wrote:Ok. Next, we'll get a glimpse of JuJu. I think that's her name. Haven't seen her play.
Supposedly she's better than Clarke
No one thinks this. She's got talent though.
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
- ___Rand___
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,324
- And1: 13,855
- Joined: Feb 26, 2017
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Saw this elsewhere titled "Hailey Van Brick" and thought hilarious. Quite a few are upset with her performance last night.



Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
-
Lockdown504090
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,905
- And1: 12,762
- Joined: Nov 24, 2015
-
Re: March Madness Discussion and prospect watch
Mk0 wrote:wojoaderge wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:
What does "created" mean?
She scored 41 and had 12 assists. Basically everything they did was centered around her, I think they just worded it oddly.
They making these for people who don’t understand basketball but meme on women’s sports. It’s pretty insecure, but nobody can deny that the strategy has gotten more eyeballs on the sport





