2024 NFL Draft - five picks in the first three rounds (seven in four! [probably])

Matches Malone · Post #1281 » by **Matches Malone** » Mon Apr 1, 2024 10:54 pm

crkone wrote:

Read on Twitter

I'd consider it only because of how much MLF utilizes multiple TE sets. A rotation of Bowers, Kraft and Musgrave is punishing for opposing LB's and I'm sure we'd even get some cool 3 TE plays but instead of Deguara, you insert a V8 supercharged version with a well-rounded game. Could be cool.

Post #1282 » by **ReasonablySober** » Mon Apr 1, 2024 11:10 pm

crkone wrote:

Read on Twitter

Yes. Hell, if he gets close to #20 and all it takes is a 4th (or even the 3rd) I'm happily moving up.

LittleRooster · Post #1283 » by **LittleRooster** » Mon Apr 1, 2024 11:52 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
crkone wrote:

Read on Twitter

Yes. Hell, if he gets close to #20 and all it takes is a 4th (or even the 3rd) I'm happily moving up.

Same

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MVP2110 · Post #1284 » by **MVP2110** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 12:10 am

Yes you absolutely take Bowers. That said if he falls to 25 it's probably for a reason that would also lead to us avoiding him(ex. Injury or off field stuff)

Post #1285 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 12:15 am

Bowers would have insane seasons in this offense. Supercharged Kittle.

VooDoo7 · Post #1286 » by **VooDoo7** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 1:37 am

ReasonablySober wrote:TBH, Barton's size scares me.

What scares you about it?

Isocleas2 · Post #1287 » by **Isocleas2** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 1:53 am

I'd take Bowers at 25 for sure, running 2 TE sets virtually every play is how I'd like to see the offense operate anyways.

Any bold predictions for the draft or should we save them for another week or two?

Mine is no linebackers or running backs on day 1 or 2. I think they focus on the secondary and offensive + defensive line instead.

Post #1288 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 1:58 am

VooDoo7 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:TBH, Barton's size scares me.

What scares you about it?

Read on Twitter

(I say this as I post a graphic of him being athletic as hell)

He's a bit light in the ass.

VooDoo7 · Post #1289 » by **VooDoo7** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 1:59 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
VooDoo7 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:TBH, Barton's size scares me.

What scares you about it?

Read on Twitter

(I say this as I post a graphic of him being athletic as hell)

He's a bit light in the ass.

Nothing a few Wisconsin cheese curds can't handle.

Matches Malone · Post #1290 » by **Matches Malone** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 3:51 am

Some of these guys shed a few pounds before they have to run these drills, so he'll probably add a couple pounds, but even at 313 that would only put him behind Walker as the 2nd heaviest on the line, weighing more than Elgton, Tom and Myers. His RAS is still 9.85 at OT and a 10.00 at OC. Dude could be a stud on the line.

RRyder823 · Post #1291 » by **RRyder823** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 4:50 am

ReasonablySober wrote:Bowers would have insane seasons in this offense. Supercharged Kittle.

Listen Bowers is a damn good TE prospect and yes if he slides id take him without thinkin twice.

But holy ****. Calling him a "Supercharged Kittle" is the equivalent of saying best TE ever

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app

Post #1292 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 1:03 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:Bowers would have insane seasons in this offense. Supercharged Kittle.

Listen Bowers is a damn good TE prospect and yes if he slides id take him without thinkin twice.

But holy ****. Calling him a "Supercharged Kittle" is the equivalent of saying best TE ever

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app

Better version of Kittle is exactly what he'd be in Green Bay.

Ron Swanson · Post #1293 » by **Ron Swanson** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 1:54 pm

Can't even begin to fantasize about all the H-back sets MLF would run with Bowers in the backfield. Jacobs/Bowers/Musgrave/Watson/Reed all on the field at the same time occupying every open space of turf would absolutely break the league. Like, who do you even cover?

MKE_Hodag22 · Post #1294 » by **MKE_Hodag22** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 2:02 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:Can't even begin to fantasize about all the H-back sets MLF would run with Bowers in the backfield. Jacobs/Bowers/Musgrave/Watson/Reed all on the field at the same time occupying every open space of turf would absolutely break the league. Like, who do you even cover?

Would certainly be hard to scheme against. And then you have Kraft to spell either for a breather/to punish someone on a block. Though, highly improbable, nice to think about force-trading in Madden 2025 lol.

Post #1295 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 3:40 pm

Tried out the PFN simulator. Not sure how I feel about this one.

38. Darius Robinson EDGE Missouri
41. Zach Frazier OC West Virginia
61. Michael Hall Jr. DT Ohio State
65. Payton Wilson LB NC State
66. Cole Bishop S Utah
88. Mike Sainristil CB Michigan
164. Javon Foster OT Missouri
169. Tyrone Tracy Jr. RB Purdue
202. Trey Taylor S Air Force
219. Dylan McMahon OG NC State
245. Jackson Mitchell LB UConn
255. Cam Little K Arkansas

2025 TEN 1st

Traded down a few times, filled few holes and added a bunch of depth with guys I like, and landed Tennessee's 2025 first round pick (which is going to be Luther Burden III, WR, Missouri).

Matches Malone · Post #1296 » by **Matches Malone** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 4:21 pm

Read on Twitter

Post #1297 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 4:26 pm

Wouldn't hate Guyton outside and Tom replacing Runyan Jr.

LUKE23 · Post #1298 » by **LUKE23** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 4:58 pm

Zero chance they are moving Tom from RT.

Post #1299 » by **ReasonablySober** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 5:00 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Zero chance they are moving Tom from RT.

They've already done this once with Elgton Jenkins, a guy who was better at OT than he has been at guard and center. They're going to get the best five offensive linemen on the field.

LUKE23 · Post #1300 » by **LUKE23** » Tue Apr 2, 2024 5:02 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
They've already done this once with Elgton Jenkins, a guy who was better at OT than he has been at guard and center. They're going to get the best five offensive linemen on the field.

That's because they had arguably the best LT in football prior to his injury. That isn't apples to apples.

Tom was a top 3 RT last year. So yes, I guess it's possible they find the best RT in football. Just very, very unlikely.