SharoneWright wrote:Another misread of the market by this management team. Should’ve signed him right after they traded for him. New York didn’t want to give him his number… That number was not 30 million. He would’ve taken his number at that time - which is now, no longer his number.
Even Pelton at ESPN is driving up Quickley’s price. Has him the #4 overall free agent. Right behind Maxey.
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/40223930/nba-free-agency-2024-ranking-top-20-players-available
What makes you think he would have taken the 25m with us that he wanted in the offseason? He had already increased his value by putting up the same 15 ppg on better efficiency in less minutes with the Knicks. He was coming in here with a chance to start, play big minutes and put up some big numbers. What incentive would he have to take an extension when the expectation would be that he increases his value and production with more opportunity here?
























