DOT wrote:Look, I know people are in full "f*ck them picks" mode, but we do still have pretty glaring holes on the roster (especially if we can't bring back iHart and/or have to trade Mitch, even if we don't trade him he's still unreliable though), and if you can't trade the picks for a player to fill that hole, it's worth a shot to at least try and draft someone. Worst case we spent a late 1st on someone who isn't good, while that's not ideal it happens all the time, we can survive missing on late 1sts much easier than missing on lottery picks, but upside is you get a guy who can contribute and is on a team friendly deal who can possibly be traded down the line for positive value
That's better than trading the picks for basically nothing.
No, people aren't in that mode. You like to think they are in that mode so you can bang the drum around drafting.
The Knicks specifically didn't trade picks from this year, for whatever reason.
I'd personally like to see them draft 3 players, but gut feeling is they trade 1 of the 1st round picks into the future.
I've been saying that for weeks, but I thought it was in the context of them being able to say "see, we have all these picks to trade still", but now it might be to sort of recover some draft/trade maneuverability.
They are light at PG, teams can always use another wing or backup PF, and of course, the C situation is still up in the air.
Not to bring trades into the draft topic, but I think the Knicks deal Mitch to clear cap space for iShart, and then either draft a big or sign one in FA. The other pick(s) will be based on who they think they can get cheaply to fill other roles.
Like, if they KNOW they can sign Lowry, they won't draft a PG, maybe
If they KNOW they can sign Goga (I don't think they would know), maybe they don't draft a C.
And so on.