phincsfan wrote:Fierce1 wrote:hugepatsfan wrote:
Ok, fine. Bump Tatum up to 37 which would be a career high in minutes/game for him. So now in my post above replace "17" with "15" . That still gets bumped up to 20 when you factor in all the extra time "player X" gets with other guys missing time.
It doesn't change the substance of my post at all. There's inevitably going to be a few vets who have to settle for minimum deals that seem too good for that. We have a 20+ minute per game regular season role to offer them if there's a good fit. And a playoff rotation role if they can beat out Pritchard, who isn't a world beater of an NBA player. We're talking about a guy who, in theory, would have the market dictating to them that they're only worth the minimum too. We're not talking an all star here.
If it's a big man, it's possible.
But wings and guards will not want Boston.
Hauser is the 7th man and he only got 22 minutes per game last season.
I just don't see it.
Brissett already gave us an idea of the situation.
I think Oshae's situation was he just couldn't shoot good enough to where Joe and the nerds could trust him to get meaningful minutes. Majority of the main rotation was taking almost 5 three's a game and hitting over 35%.
Give the kid Peterson a shot.
If Peterson gets a shot then that means no vet minimum signing.
That's what I'm saying, just give the guys we have now a shot.
No need for external help.
Time to let guys like Springer and Walsh get a shot.












