Context wrote:I didnt say that...I'm saying that hes in a position to make choices about happiness and not money
because he doesnt need it.
If I have 2 million in savings and I have two job offers. The first offer is for 350k with NO percentage of the profits of the business. The second offers is 60k with 5% of gross revenue.
The fact that I already have "money" puts me in a position to take the second offer- if I find it appealing. If I have no savings and a full family to feed- even if I dont like the work environment and or 1st offer - I have to take the offer and take care of my family.
This is just crazy lol. Very few NBA players ever take pay cuts. And if they do, we are talking like 5-10%. Not 50%.
Can you give me one example where this has ever happened?
As much as I like iHart. End of the day, he's just a role player for us. If anybody is going to take a pay cut for the Knicks, it will likely be Brunson doing something like Dirk did for the Mavs or Duncan for the Spurs. I can see Brunson (or maybe Randle) doing something like this, because I wouldn't be surprised if they retire as a Knick. And Dolan would then throw them a backloaded contract when they are in their mid-30s. I could never see a scenario like this for iHart.
Guys like iHart don't willingly take pay cuts. Nor should they. NBA owners should pay fair value for player contacts.
And he's going to a team that are equal to or better than the Knicks.
This was a no-brainer decision for iHart.



















