Image ImageImage Image

Potential Zach Trade Partners? 24/25 Edition

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 14,499
And1: 13,606
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1001 » by FriedRise » Tue Jul 9, 2024 1:59 am

MGB8 wrote:Still don’t think that any team is taking Zach right now. I think people are still underestimating how much the updated CBA changed things. There is no room for “bad” max contracts anymore. The whole “Max is underpaying” notion is kind of out the window.

Look at Phoenix, one “worth it” Max in Durant, one close to worth it in Booker (maybe), and a bad Max in older Beal (and forget the for issues, on top). All 50M is per year. That bad max keeps the Suns from getting 2 - 3 high level role players to replace the one bad max. Imagine swapping out Beal for old man Conley + Dillon Brooks + DiVincenzo… (and still not paying as much).

Zach is getting paid 46M per year for the next 3 seasons AAV…. before a team would be fine with that - just be in the LT, but an elite offensive shooter who could do a bit more and pass on D would be worth it.

Now… with the extra issues created by the second apron (not to mention repeater biting more) that skillset is high level role player more than true Max (offensive focal point / creator / player you build around)… and high level role players need to be at 50–60% Max at most.

If he fully bounces back, maybe a desperate team will take a neutral value trade for him. But absent some sort of unlikely player development, that contract will still be too much of a risk for most teams.


Seems like a lot of the big spending teams are actively offloading contracts now to duck the tax. I wonder if next summer teams will be more open to taking on bigger contracts if they don't have to worry about getting hit by the repeater.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,186
And1: 7,863
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1002 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:02 am

I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,769
And1: 44,026
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1003 » by zimpy27 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:09 am

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,233
And1: 11,894
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1004 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Jul 9, 2024 3:44 am

zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Isn’t Ayton considered a horrible contract? At least Zach actually likes playing basketball and works hard to get better. Ayton is Eddy Curry.
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,186
And1: 7,863
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1005 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:03 am

zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


I like that Ayton/Thybulle both expire a year earlier than Zach, but Ayton’s a pretty lousy culture guy and an even worse bet to rehab his value than Zach is, so this is one I’d hip pocket for the deadline in case we truly had no other options.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
Ccwatercraft
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,769
Joined: Jul 11, 2017
       

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1006 » by Ccwatercraft » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:26 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Isn’t Ayton considered a horrible contract? At least Zach actually likes playing basketball and works hard to get better. Ayton is Eddy Curry.


Not thrilled with that from a basketball perspective, we're downgrading and giving them back their pick which in theory means more to them than us but they win both sides here.

it takes a year off our financial responsibility but doesn't really give us anything to look forward to on the court. The only potential upside is if you have another trade pending to move vuc and Ayton decides to be a highly motivated player all of a sudden, which is certainly possible. IF Portland wants that pick back they shouldn't be gifted it.
boozapalooza
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,619
And1: 981
Joined: Jun 26, 2013

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1007 » by boozapalooza » Tue Jul 9, 2024 4:57 am

Read on Twitter
?s=46

This statistic is hard to believe
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,769
And1: 44,026
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1008 » by zimpy27 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 5:11 am

Ccwatercraft wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:

Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Isn’t Ayton considered a horrible contract? At least Zach actually likes playing basketball and works hard to get better. Ayton is Eddy Curry.


Not thrilled with that from a basketball perspective, we're downgrading and giving them back their pick which in theory means more to them than us but they win both sides here.

it takes a year off our financial responsibility but doesn't really give us anything to look forward to on the court. The only potential upside is if you have another trade pending to move vuc and Ayton decides to be a highly motivated player all of a sudden, which is certainly possible. IF Portland wants that pick back they shouldn't be gifted it.


Ayton seems to be immature but will mature at some point. Maybe moving to his 3rd team would sort it out.

Also, he's young and fits the Bulls timeline as a starting C. I do think her fit the system there and could learn from Vuc as a similar player.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,972
And1: 14,307
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1009 » by JRoy » Tue Jul 9, 2024 5:40 am

zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Zero interest for POR.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
chicago paxsons
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,636
And1: 862
Joined: Mar 23, 2020
 

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1010 » by chicago paxsons » Tue Jul 9, 2024 5:42 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Isn’t Ayton considered a horrible contract? At least Zach actually likes playing basketball and works hard to get better. Ayton is Eddy Curry.


Ayton has 2 years instead of lavine's 3, though lavine's 3rd is a player option, and ayton is making about 10 million less a year which gives us a little more cap room, not enough to make a big difference, but still.

Ayton would add to our youth movement and, if we find a taker for vuc, we won't be limited to jalen smith as our lone big.

As far as ayton not being mature/eddy curry-like, I feel like it's almost a win-win for us. If ayton gets his act together, we moved on from lavine for someone portland gave up on and we added a versatile big to the young core. If ayton continues as he is then he'll help us lose games more than lavine with a chip on his shoulder would which will help with our rebuild.
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,559
And1: 4,352
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1011 » by pipfan » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:14 am

No way Port deals for Lavine. They have Sharpe and Simons at the 2 guard, both of whom need starter minutes
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,233
And1: 11,894
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1012 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:27 am

zimpy27 wrote:
Ccwatercraft wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
Isn’t Ayton considered a horrible contract? At least Zach actually likes playing basketball and works hard to get better. Ayton is Eddy Curry.


Not thrilled with that from a basketball perspective, we're downgrading and giving them back their pick which in theory means more to them than us but they win both sides here.

it takes a year off our financial responsibility but doesn't really give us anything to look forward to on the court. The only potential upside is if you have another trade pending to move vuc and Ayton decides to be a highly motivated player all of a sudden, which is certainly possible. IF Portland wants that pick back they shouldn't be gifted it.


Ayton seems to be immature but will mature at some point. Maybe moving to his 3rd team would sort it out.

Also, he's young and fits the Bulls timeline as a starting C. I do think her fit the system there and could learn from Vuc as a similar player.


I’d rather have Jalen Smith as our starting center. He will likely give us close to what Ayton would including much better 3 point shooting for less than a 3rd of the cost. And he did actually improve on his second team. Non-star centers are not worth much these days.
the_process
RealGM
Posts: 29,417
And1: 10,463
Joined: May 01, 2010

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1013 » by the_process » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:34 am

Zach and that protected POR 1st you're holding to WSH for Poole and Kuzma.
Indomitable
RealGM
Posts: 26,033
And1: 6,709
Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Location: Yelzenbah!
     

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1014 » by Indomitable » Tue Jul 9, 2024 6:41 am

the_process wrote:Zach and that protected POR 1st you're holding to WSH for Poole and Kuzma.

Hell no to Poole
:banghead:
Onibuh
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 225
Joined: Jun 23, 2017
       

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1015 » by Onibuh » Tue Jul 9, 2024 9:44 am

just keep him, let him play and if he grows back his value and still wants to leave you will find a team willing to trade for him.
User avatar
coldfish
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 60,778
And1: 38,148
Joined: Jun 11, 2004
Location: Right in the middle
   

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1016 » by coldfish » Tue Jul 9, 2024 10:50 am

I'm not sure the real Bulls feel this way but IMO, the downside risks of keeping him are zero. Worst case is that he refuses to play or throws a fit and makes the team worse . . . helping the tank. If he comes in and plays well, his contract will get shorter as time goes on and his value will go up.

Play him, let him be the alpha when the game is on the line, etc. Its fine.

One of the scenarios I can see happening is for the offense to be fine, lots of players to get numbers and still have the team lose night in and night out due to atrocious defense. That's not the end of the world.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,747
And1: 9,232
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1017 » by Chi town » Tue Jul 9, 2024 12:37 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Ayton is worse value than Zach.
dpucane
Sophomore
Posts: 212
And1: 82
Joined: Feb 07, 2009

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1018 » by dpucane » Tue Jul 9, 2024 1:14 pm

Chi town wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:I hope the Cowley report about the Bulls shopping Zach with the Sac picks is wrong. Not because I wouldn’t do it (I would), but believing two seconds will be the thing to convince a team to take on $138M is legitimately embarrassing for the front office.



Blazers might want their pick back just for flexibility sake.

LaVine+POR25FRP
For
Ayton+Matisse

This doesn't seem unreasonable to me especially since they have Reap, Clingan, RW3.


Ayton is worse value than Zach.



1 less year at 2/3rds the salary. Easier to dump, good tank commander, and like a 10% shot of Billy getting through to him.
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 30,371
And1: 15,607
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1019 » by DASMACKDOWN » Tue Jul 9, 2024 1:40 pm

coldfish wrote:I'm not sure the real Bulls feel this way but IMO, the downside risks of keeping him are zero. Worst case is that he refuses to play or throws a fit and makes the team worse . . . helping the tank. If he comes in and plays well, his contract will get shorter as time goes on and his value will go up.

Play him, let him be the alpha when the game is on the line, etc. Its fine.

One of the scenarios I can see happening is for the offense to be fine, lots of players to get numbers and still have the team lose night in and night out due to atrocious defense. That's not the end of the world.


You are probably right on how most of us feel.

What is our tax position if Zach has to play the whole season with us and then start the 25-26 season? We have Josh Giddey pending contract and that could be worth 175-200 mil.

Would we trade Zach for Ben Simmons just to get off the contract?
Red8911
RealGM
Posts: 14,876
And1: 4,736
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
Location: BROOKLYN

Re: Potential Zach Trade Partners? Playoff Edition. 

Post#1020 » by Red8911 » Tue Jul 9, 2024 2:04 pm

Would be super awkward if Zach stayed once again after the bulls shopped him to the whole league.

There’s plenty of time before the season starts to find a deal, I still think they’ll trade him.

Both sides are just done with each other. I don’t see how they can go back to normal like nothing happened. How would Zach even be motivated to play for the bulls anymore ?

Return to Chicago Bulls