brackdan70 wrote:I just googled best nba players of all time. The first two hits had Curry 10th and 15th.
Look at his numbers vs Durrant in the 2017 finals. That’s hard to argue with. Durant was a beast.
Iguadola MVP….yes should have been Steph. That’s a difference of opinion. 2017 reg season MVP. Could have easily been Steph I agree. There were several guys right in there, super tight. Not gaslighting but a difference of opinion. Steph was the MVP the previous two years…was that gas lighting Lebron?
This Olympics…J mean they were both in the mix, no clear cut favorite to me. You wanted your guy to win and I get it.
It seems to me that Steph is fairly rated by Media and fans as one of the all time greats.
As an all-time great who is still currently playing and can still add to his legacy—I ask you isn't it odd that there isn't even more hype?
Where is the discussion wondering how good can Curry actually be?
Where is the discussion asking if he can surpass LeBron and even Jordan?
Where is LeBron vs. Steph?
We see every dumb comparison out there repeated ad nauseum but the most obvious one is avoided like the plague?
While we're given the narrative of LeBron chasing the ghost of MJ, we're fed the baloney that that's it, that's all Steph can do—and that basically started right after getting the unanimous.
That is completely unusual and unexpected—and bogus.
Go ahead and try explaining it in any logical fashion. The one that makes the most sense is that vested interests intervened to stop the Curry hype and it is clear they are still active.