Lay low on pot.
It's like pitching idea of Lebron backing Paolo

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

pepe1991 wrote:CJ is instant starter and best guard on Magic, like , apsolute no brainer. Bro just averaged 20-4,5-4,5 on 59% TS on 49 wins team. on West.
Lay low on pot.
It's like pitching idea of Lebron backing Paolo
Magic's future first-round picks
2025 first-round pick (own)
2025 first-round pick (top-5 protected from Denver Nuggets)
2026 first-round pick (own)
2026 first-round pick (Phoenix Suns or Washington Wizards)
2027 first-round pick (own)
2028 first-round pick (own)
2029 first-round pick (own)
2030 first-round pick (own)
2031 first-round pick (own)
The Nuggets’ 2024 second-rounder.
The least favorable of the Magic’s, Pistons’, and Bucks’ 2026 second-rounders.
The Celtics’ 2028 second-rounder (top-45 protected).
drsd wrote:OMD has a story on the Magic's FRP assets:Magic's future first-round picks
2025 first-round pick (own)
2025 first-round pick (top-5 protected from Denver Nuggets)
2026 first-round pick (own)
2026 first-round pick (Phoenix Suns or Washington Wizards)
2027 first-round pick (own)
2028 first-round pick (own)
2029 first-round pick (own)
2030 first-round pick (own)
2031 first-round pick (own)
That led me to re-examine the Phoenix trade. In 2026, the Magic has only one FRP (the above implies two FRPs in 2026), and it will be the second best of the FRPs between Washington, Phoenix, and Orlando. As Orlando is probably going to be the better of these three teams, that means Orlando would move up in the draft from this trade. Perhaps substantially as the Wizards and the Suns could very well both be in the lottery. And minus career-ending injuries to several Magicians, the Magic won't be in the lottery.
Why am I bringing this up? Because we all know the Magic traded three SRPs for this. But I for one did not realize how horrible these seconds are.The Nuggets’ 2024 second-rounder.
The least favorable of the Magic’s, Pistons’, and Bucks’ 2026 second-rounders.
The Celtics’ 2028 second-rounder (top-45 protected).
Wow does it look like the Magic hosed the Suns in this trade. Orlando trades three picks in the last 40s or lower for a potential swap from a 20s to a lottery pick. WOW!
..
basketballRob wrote:This is the first offseason that Suggs hasn't participated in any activities in Orlando. I wouldn't doubt if his agent asked for a trade to a team that could give him a 5-yr deal. Of course, Weltman won't do that. The Magic holds the cards and can wait until the next offseason where another team can only offer him a 4-yr deal, and then we can match. That's why they'll probably come to an agreement soon on an extension.

Man, rough market out there for guardspepe1991 wrote:There are rumors Bucks might give Fultz camp contract.
Guy cemented his legacy as top 5 worst 1st overall pick in nba history.
pepe1991 wrote:There are rumors Bucks might give Fultz camp contract.
Guy cemented his legacy as top 5 worst 1st overall pick in nba history.
pepe1991 wrote:There are rumors Bucks might give Fultz camp contract.
Guy cemented his legacy as top 5 worst 1st overall pick in nba history.

Haha I remember that poster. I always found his interest so odd, but that's Fultz' aura right therep0peye wrote:pepe1991 wrote:There are rumors Bucks might give Fultz camp contract.
Guy cemented his legacy as top 5 worst 1st overall pick in nba history.
There was that one Jazz fan lurking on our boards past year or two, willing to offer 20M+ contract (or something like that) to Markelle.

drsd wrote:If Black is "the future of PG" for Orlando, then Suggs needs to be traded. It's pretty obvious that he cannot be part of a 5-year plan. That said, signing him makes him as tradeable as he is now. So I don't see what a 28-32M per year deal hasn't been worked out.

pepe1991 wrote:There are rumors Bucks might give Fultz camp contract.
Guy cemented his legacy as top 5 worst 1st overall pick in nba history.
Knightro wrote:drsd wrote:If Black is "the future of PG" for Orlando, then Suggs needs to be traded. It's pretty obvious that he cannot be part of a 5-year plan. That said, signing him makes him as tradeable as he is now. So I don't see what a 28-32M per year deal hasn't been worked out.
This is just off-the-wall stuff.
Suggs is miles and miles better than Black is right now. Black didn't get a single meaningful PG rep in his rookie season and because of some nebulous "PG of the future" discussion it's Suggs that needs to be traded?
Come on man.
Knightro wrote:He's (Fultz) really close to being one of the 5 worst top picks of all time and he might be there.
I would definitely put Anthony Bennett, Greg Oden, Michael Olowakandi and LaRue Martin ahead of him.

AB vs Suggs is the new Fultz vs Suggs, eh? AB/Suggs backcourt is the obvious answer, here.drsd wrote:Knightro wrote:drsd wrote:If Black is "the future of PG" for Orlando, then Suggs needs to be traded. It's pretty obvious that he cannot be part of a 5-year plan. That said, signing him makes him as tradeable as he is now. So I don't see what a 28-32M per year deal hasn't been worked out.
This is just off-the-wall stuff.
Suggs is miles and miles better than Black is right now. Black didn't get a single meaningful PG rep in his rookie season and because of some nebulous "PG of the future" discussion it's Suggs that needs to be traded?
Come on man.
And-1
I absolutely agree with you! And it again points to the real issue: why is Black on this roster?
He is NOT the future at PG. (and if he is anything, he's a SF). No way is he getting starting forward minutes on this team.
My actual view: sign Suggs for 30M a year. Trade Black. If not, then trade Anthony. Something's gotta give.
To your thought line: Suggs is miles and miles better than Black is right now
I would add that I cannot see a scenario where Black is a better player than Suggs. So this is not an Oladipo/Fournier type choice. The choice is simple. Retain Suggs and get rid of Black (or Anthony).
drsd wrote:Knightro wrote:He's (Fultz) really close to being one of the 5 worst top picks of all time and he might be there.
I would definitely put Anthony Bennett, Greg Oden, Michael Olowakandi and LaRue Martin ahead of him.
Ayton gets more hype than I think he deserves. Simmons will never get a bust label becasue he made an All-NBA team, but he is very Fultz-like to me. Bargnani, Bogut, and Smith are also disappointing relative to overall- #1. Smith
For me:
Bennett is easily the worst #1 of the last 50 years.
Oden is a close second.
Olowokandi third.
Ellison is forth.
Brown is fifth.
(I can't judge L. Martin).
And a factoid that blows my mind, Klay Thompson's dad went #1 over players that included Larry Bird. It was a weak draft, and Mychal Thompson did have a near Hall of Fame career. But to be drafted over Bird. Hmmm. Something to tell the grandkids.
p0peye wrote:Oden could play, like for real. He demonstrated that in games where he was healthy. Other guys on that list are just....really bad.