ImageImageImageImageImage

The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#781 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:44 am

Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
That is pretty low expectation for someone who isn't going to be a good defender.
I shall see if Walter has better potential and leap frog Dick. Walter should have the same expectation as a shooter, yet, his defense was better in summer league.

Long term I dont think we are Walter or Dick it can be both of them together. Defence would be tricky, but IQ/Walter/Dick/Barnes is completely functionable offensively (if guys develop properly).

If Walter becomes a 2-way player and can defend that helps that end of the floor to.


Sadly, I don't see both of them together. I don't even see Quickley-Walter-Dick-Barnes lineup, since they don't offer enough on both ends. Lack of ball penetration / rim pressure, and lack of point of attack defender.

As for Walter-Dick lineup, they are too small. Even Barrett was too small, let alone either Walter or Dick at SF. I see one of them being bench player. Furthermore, on Quickley-Walter-Dick lineup, two of them would be bench player to provide better rim pressure and point of attack defense.

I disagree they are to small. This is not 2004 anymore - Walter is a perfectly fine SG and projects as a decent to good defender, and Dick (you hope) is going to get bigger and is pretty average for a SF but in all honesty I don't see him being any better guarding 2 vs 3's.

Obivously once you are in championship mode you need something better, but right now there is no reason they cannot co-exist
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,744
And1: 3,625
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#782 » by Indeed » Thu Oct 10, 2024 12:58 pm

PoundTown wrote:
Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Long term I dont think we are Walter or Dick it can be both of them together. Defence would be tricky, but IQ/Walter/Dick/Barnes is completely functionable offensively (if guys develop properly).

If Walter becomes a 2-way player and can defend that helps that end of the floor to.


Sadly, I don't see both of them together. I don't even see Quickley-Walter-Dick-Barnes lineup, since they don't offer enough on both ends. Lack of ball penetration / rim pressure, and lack of point of attack defender.

As for Walter-Dick lineup, they are too small. Even Barrett was too small, let alone either Walter or Dick at SF. I see one of them being bench player. Furthermore, on Quickley-Walter-Dick lineup, two of them would be bench player to provide better rim pressure and point of attack defense.


What would really tie the team together is a big combo wing with a 3 and D game. I mean cooper Flagg would be perfect, but someone in the mould of minny mcdaniels even would really be great, and then Walter or dick off the bench. Gradey might be the piece we have to deal because it’s possible that IQ, barrett, Scottie and a 3 and D wing will give us enough shooting, and along with a good defensive Center, we could be solid enough defensively too. I probably believe in RJ offensively more than most though.


Barrett definitely showed being a top option. His isolation is pretty good.

Meanwhile, I don't think McDaniels would work. We really need another elite scoring option with defense to compensate being average on both ends. I think anyone on the top 3 or 5 would work, but if he is not a SF size, we will have a tougher time adjusting the lineup. Even he is a SF, we will hardly see Walter-Dick, since you need to have Barrett or Flagg (or the SF) pairing with Quickley/Mitchell/Shead PG.

Therefore, I can only see either Walter or Dick being long term.
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,744
And1: 3,625
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#783 » by Indeed » Thu Oct 10, 2024 1:04 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Long term I dont think we are Walter or Dick it can be both of them together. Defence would be tricky, but IQ/Walter/Dick/Barnes is completely functionable offensively (if guys develop properly).

If Walter becomes a 2-way player and can defend that helps that end of the floor to.


Sadly, I don't see both of them together. I don't even see Quickley-Walter-Dick-Barnes lineup, since they don't offer enough on both ends. Lack of ball penetration / rim pressure, and lack of point of attack defender.

As for Walter-Dick lineup, they are too small. Even Barrett was too small, let alone either Walter or Dick at SF. I see one of them being bench player. Furthermore, on Quickley-Walter-Dick lineup, two of them would be bench player to provide better rim pressure and point of attack defense.

I disagree they are to small. This is not 2004 anymore - Walter is a perfectly fine SG and projects as a decent to good defender, and Dick (you hope) is going to get bigger and is pretty average for a SF but in all honesty I don't see him being any better guarding 2 vs 3's.

Obivously once you are in championship mode you need something better, but right now there is no reason they cannot co-exist


We said we were too small last year on multiple game threads after trade deadline, right?
There might be some injures in those game threads, but it was consistently came up as one of our problem last year.
Walter at his size won't change that, and some of us were looking forward to Mogbo to play some forward, but it does not seem he is ready for bench minutes from the first few games.
manjusaka
Pro Prospect
Posts: 906
And1: 594
Joined: Oct 25, 2017
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#784 » by manjusaka » Thu Oct 10, 2024 1:42 pm

Dick is showing that he can finish at the rim. If he can go to his spot and gets his shot off consistently in the mid-range, he is going to be a 3 level scorer. Not a Kyle Korver type that many people thought last year.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#785 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:44 pm

Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
Sadly, I don't see both of them together. I don't even see Quickley-Walter-Dick-Barnes lineup, since they don't offer enough on both ends. Lack of ball penetration / rim pressure, and lack of point of attack defender.

As for Walter-Dick lineup, they are too small. Even Barrett was too small, let alone either Walter or Dick at SF. I see one of them being bench player. Furthermore, on Quickley-Walter-Dick lineup, two of them would be bench player to provide better rim pressure and point of attack defense.

I disagree they are to small. This is not 2004 anymore - Walter is a perfectly fine SG and projects as a decent to good defender, and Dick (you hope) is going to get bigger and is pretty average for a SF but in all honesty I don't see him being any better guarding 2 vs 3's.

Obivously once you are in championship mode you need something better, but right now there is no reason they cannot co-exist


We said we were too small last year on multiple game threads after trade deadline, right?
There might be some injures in those game threads, but it was consistently came up as one of our problem last year.
Walter at his size won't change that, and some of us were looking forward to Mogbo to play some forward, but it does not seem he is ready for bench minutes from the first few games.

After the trade deadline we were playing without Poeltl, or Barnes, or RJ for most of that time. So whatever we complained about then is frankly irrelevant.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#786 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 2:49 pm

Indeed wrote:
PoundTown wrote:
Indeed wrote:
Sadly, I don't see both of them together. I don't even see Quickley-Walter-Dick-Barnes lineup, since they don't offer enough on both ends. Lack of ball penetration / rim pressure, and lack of point of attack defender.

As for Walter-Dick lineup, they are too small. Even Barrett was too small, let alone either Walter or Dick at SF. I see one of them being bench player. Furthermore, on Quickley-Walter-Dick lineup, two of them would be bench player to provide better rim pressure and point of attack defense.


What would really tie the team together is a big combo wing with a 3 and D game. I mean cooper Flagg would be perfect, but someone in the mould of minny mcdaniels even would really be great, and then Walter or dick off the bench. Gradey might be the piece we have to deal because it’s possible that IQ, barrett, Scottie and a 3 and D wing will give us enough shooting, and along with a good defensive Center, we could be solid enough defensively too. I probably believe in RJ offensively more than most though.


Barrett definitely showed being a top option. His isolation is pretty good.

Meanwhile, I don't think McDaniels would work. We really need another elite scoring option with defense to compensate being average on both ends. I think anyone on the top 3 or 5 would work, but if he is not a SF size, we will have a tougher time adjusting the lineup. Even he is a SF, we will hardly see Walter-Dick, since you need to have Barrett or Flagg (or the SF) pairing with Quickley/Mitchell/Shead PG.

Therefore, I can only see either Walter or Dick being long term.

McDaniels would work because he is a great fit on any NBA team. Very Anunoby like in that regard.

We don't gotta get to caught up in the "final iteration" of what this looks like. Completely possible you get together a very good group of guys and you end up "missing" that scoring option but you can always resort back to trades and give up a bunch of picks in 2-4 years time (which is how I think the NBA is going - eventually all the chips gotta be played)
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,744
And1: 3,625
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#787 » by Indeed » Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:12 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:I disagree they are to small. This is not 2004 anymore - Walter is a perfectly fine SG and projects as a decent to good defender, and Dick (you hope) is going to get bigger and is pretty average for a SF but in all honesty I don't see him being any better guarding 2 vs 3's.

Obivously once you are in championship mode you need something better, but right now there is no reason they cannot co-exist


We said we were too small last year on multiple game threads after trade deadline, right?
There might be some injures in those game threads, but it was consistently came up as one of our problem last year.
Walter at his size won't change that, and some of us were looking forward to Mogbo to play some forward, but it does not seem he is ready for bench minutes from the first few games.

After the trade deadline we were playing without Poeltl, or Barnes, or RJ for most of that time. So whatever we complained about then is frankly irrelevant.


We shall see this year.
I don't think the size and height changed that much with these injuries, the replacement are about the size and height.
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,744
And1: 3,625
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#788 » by Indeed » Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:17 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
PoundTown wrote:
What would really tie the team together is a big combo wing with a 3 and D game. I mean cooper Flagg would be perfect, but someone in the mould of minny mcdaniels even would really be great, and then Walter or dick off the bench. Gradey might be the piece we have to deal because it’s possible that IQ, barrett, Scottie and a 3 and D wing will give us enough shooting, and along with a good defensive Center, we could be solid enough defensively too. I probably believe in RJ offensively more than most though.


Barrett definitely showed being a top option. His isolation is pretty good.

Meanwhile, I don't think McDaniels would work. We really need another elite scoring option with defense to compensate being average on both ends. I think anyone on the top 3 or 5 would work, but if he is not a SF size, we will have a tougher time adjusting the lineup. Even he is a SF, we will hardly see Walter-Dick, since you need to have Barrett or Flagg (or the SF) pairing with Quickley/Mitchell/Shead PG.

Therefore, I can only see either Walter or Dick being long term.

McDaniels would work because he is a great fit on any NBA team. Very Anunoby like in that regard.

We don't gotta get to caught up in the "final iteration" of what this looks like. Completely possible you get together a very good group of guys and you end up "missing" that scoring option but you can always resort back to trades and give up a bunch of picks in 2-4 years time (which is how I think the NBA is going - eventually all the chips gotta be played)


McDaniels can create his offense?
I think we are middle of the league on offense, and our defense is at the bottom. Adding McDaniels and some improvement can put us top 10 on offense while being average on defense? That seems to be a stretch, particularly on defense.
PoundTown
Starter
Posts: 2,068
And1: 1,379
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#789 » by PoundTown » Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:25 pm

Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
Barrett definitely showed being a top option. His isolation is pretty good.

Meanwhile, I don't think McDaniels would work. We really need another elite scoring option with defense to compensate being average on both ends. I think anyone on the top 3 or 5 would work, but if he is not a SF size, we will have a tougher time adjusting the lineup. Even he is a SF, we will hardly see Walter-Dick, since you need to have Barrett or Flagg (or the SF) pairing with Quickley/Mitchell/Shead PG.

Therefore, I can only see either Walter or Dick being long term.

McDaniels would work because he is a great fit on any NBA team. Very Anunoby like in that regard.

We don't gotta get to caught up in the "final iteration" of what this looks like. Completely possible you get together a very good group of guys and you end up "missing" that scoring option but you can always resort back to trades and give up a bunch of picks in 2-4 years time (which is how I think the NBA is going - eventually all the chips gotta be played)


McDaniels can create his offense?
I think we are middle of the league on offense, and our defense is at the bottom. Adding McDaniels and some improvement can put us top 10 on offense while being average on defense? That seems to be a stretch, particularly on defense.


No, McDaniels can’t create his own offence but can finish decently enough when offence is created for him. The point is that with a competent two way center, BBQ, and some actual decent bench pieces like a dick, Walter or shead may become, that you just need someone that can play off-ball, hit open shots, score off back cuts. Anyways, that’s one path that provides BBQ still improving quite a bit, which we don’t know if it’s going to happen. Based off one quarter of preseason, RJ looked really good, though.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#790 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:28 pm

Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
Barrett definitely showed being a top option. His isolation is pretty good.

Meanwhile, I don't think McDaniels would work. We really need another elite scoring option with defense to compensate being average on both ends. I think anyone on the top 3 or 5 would work, but if he is not a SF size, we will have a tougher time adjusting the lineup. Even he is a SF, we will hardly see Walter-Dick, since you need to have Barrett or Flagg (or the SF) pairing with Quickley/Mitchell/Shead PG.

Therefore, I can only see either Walter or Dick being long term.

McDaniels would work because he is a great fit on any NBA team. Very Anunoby like in that regard.

We don't gotta get to caught up in the "final iteration" of what this looks like. Completely possible you get together a very good group of guys and you end up "missing" that scoring option but you can always resort back to trades and give up a bunch of picks in 2-4 years time (which is how I think the NBA is going - eventually all the chips gotta be played)


McDaniels can create his offense?
I think we are middle of the league on offense, and our defense is at the bottom. Adding McDaniels and some improvement can put us top 10 on offense while being average on defense? That seems to be a stretch, particularly on defense.

Not overly - but if you think we are average offensively and bad defensively, the case for McDaniels would just grow.

It doesn't matter either way, because acquiring him is impossible.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#791 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:30 pm

Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
We said we were too small last year on multiple game threads after trade deadline, right?
There might be some injures in those game threads, but it was consistently came up as one of our problem last year.
Walter at his size won't change that, and some of us were looking forward to Mogbo to play some forward, but it does not seem he is ready for bench minutes from the first few games.

After the trade deadline we were playing without Poeltl, or Barnes, or RJ for most of that time. So whatever we complained about then is frankly irrelevant.


We shall see this year.
I don't think the size and height changed that much with these injuries, the replacement are about the size and height.

Size and height =/= defensive ability.

By the end of the year we were stating Olynyk at the 5, anad Agbaji or Brown at the 4. That is significantly smaller than Poeltl/Barnes.

Just hitting random gamelogs.. we started JFL/GTJ/Dick/Agabji/Olynyk one game lol. That is SOOOO much smaller than what we have now. The theoertical IQ/Walter/Dick/Barnes/Poeltl lineup is significantly bigger for the simple fact we dont have a SG/SF playing the 4 nor a PF playing C.
PoundTown
Starter
Posts: 2,068
And1: 1,379
Joined: Aug 09, 2014
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#792 » by PoundTown » Thu Oct 10, 2024 4:51 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:McDaniels would work because he is a great fit on any NBA team. Very Anunoby like in that regard.

We don't gotta get to caught up in the "final iteration" of what this looks like. Completely possible you get together a very good group of guys and you end up "missing" that scoring option but you can always resort back to trades and give up a bunch of picks in 2-4 years time (which is how I think the NBA is going - eventually all the chips gotta be played)


McDaniels can create his offense?
I think we are middle of the league on offense, and our defense is at the bottom. Adding McDaniels and some improvement can put us top 10 on offense while being average on defense? That seems to be a stretch, particularly on defense.

Not overly - but if you think we are average offensively and bad defensively, the case for McDaniels would just grow.

It doesn't matter either way, because acquiring him is impossible.


It’s finding someone in that mould. Maybe a dude like trey Murphy comes available. Anyways, we’re still at least until next offseason before we make any moves. I’d like us to try and get to a playoff spot the year after this one. Hopefully, this year we can develop and find ourselves a talented player in the draft that becomes a difference maker for us, and then two first round picks the following year that can provide depth. At that point, you’ll probably need to consolidate some contracts as BBQ is 27 or 28 years old and we are hopefully near contender status.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#793 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:09 pm

PoundTown wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
McDaniels can create his offense?
I think we are middle of the league on offense, and our defense is at the bottom. Adding McDaniels and some improvement can put us top 10 on offense while being average on defense? That seems to be a stretch, particularly on defense.

Not overly - but if you think we are average offensively and bad defensively, the case for McDaniels would just grow.

It doesn't matter either way, because acquiring him is impossible.


It’s finding someone in that mould. Maybe a dude like trey Murphy comes available. Anyways, we’re still at least until next offseason before we make any moves. I’d like us to try and get to a playoff spot the year after this one. Hopefully, this year we can develop and find ourselves a talented player in the draft that becomes a difference maker for us, and then two first round picks the following year that can provide depth. At that point, you’ll probably need to consolidate some contracts as BBQ is 27 or 28 years old and we are hopefully near contender status.

My guess is we miss the playoffs this year and next and try and make it back in 2026/27. Add two lottery picks (plus 2026 IND pick), and then I guess try and make a splash in the 2026 off-season?
manjusaka
Pro Prospect
Posts: 906
And1: 594
Joined: Oct 25, 2017
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#794 » by manjusaka » Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:33 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
PoundTown wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Not overly - but if you think we are average offensively and bad defensively, the case for McDaniels would just grow.

It doesn't matter either way, because acquiring him is impossible.


It’s finding someone in that mould. Maybe a dude like trey Murphy comes available. Anyways, we’re still at least until next offseason before we make any moves. I’d like us to try and get to a playoff spot the year after this one. Hopefully, this year we can develop and find ourselves a talented player in the draft that becomes a difference maker for us, and then two first round picks the following year that can provide depth. At that point, you’ll probably need to consolidate some contracts as BBQ is 27 or 28 years old and we are hopefully near contender status.

My guess is we miss the playoffs this year and next and try and make it back in 2026/27. Add two lottery picks (plus 2026 IND pick), and then I guess try and make a splash in the 2026 off-season?


We typically won’t sign big free agents in the offseason. If we got cap space it probably would be used in trade to acquire more salary back in the offseason.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#795 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Oct 10, 2024 5:49 pm

manjusaka wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
PoundTown wrote:
It’s finding someone in that mould. Maybe a dude like trey Murphy comes available. Anyways, we’re still at least until next offseason before we make any moves. I’d like us to try and get to a playoff spot the year after this one. Hopefully, this year we can develop and find ourselves a talented player in the draft that becomes a difference maker for us, and then two first round picks the following year that can provide depth. At that point, you’ll probably need to consolidate some contracts as BBQ is 27 or 28 years old and we are hopefully near contender status.

My guess is we miss the playoffs this year and next and try and make it back in 2026/27. Add two lottery picks (plus 2026 IND pick), and then I guess try and make a splash in the 2026 off-season?


We typically won’t sign big free agents in the offseason. If we got cap space it probably would be used in trade to acquire more salary back in the offseason.

Splash does not necessarily mean sign a FA. You could jump into a star trade not unlike Cleveland Mitchell
Eating a Book
General Manager
Posts: 8,100
And1: 2,457
Joined: Sep 06, 2005
Location: Space.

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#796 » by Eating a Book » Fri Oct 11, 2024 3:41 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:After the trade deadline we were playing without Poeltl, or Barnes, or RJ for most of that time. So whatever we complained about then is frankly irrelevant.


We shall see this year.
I don't think the size and height changed that much with these injuries, the replacement are about the size and height.

Size and height =/= defensive ability.

By the end of the year we were stating Olynyk at the 5, anad Agbaji or Brown at the 4. That is significantly smaller than Poeltl/Barnes.

Just hitting random gamelogs.. we started JFL/GTJ/Dick/Agabji/Olynyk one game lol. That is SOOOO much smaller than what we have now. The theoertical IQ/Walter/Dick/Barnes/Poeltl lineup is significantly bigger for the simple fact we dont have a SG/SF playing the 4 nor a PF playing C.


Kind of a nitpick, but I don't really think it's fair to say KO is a PF masquerading as a C. Any critique of his defense or evaluation of his playing style aside, the dude is 6'11" and 240lbs. If we're just talking about lineup size and where each guy slots in as far as the typical size for their position, KO is a centre through-and-through. He's a very large human.

Edit: I do agree that's a very small lineup, though.
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,540
And1: 33,199
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#797 » by YogurtProducer » Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:51 pm

Eating a Book wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
Indeed wrote:
We shall see this year.
I don't think the size and height changed that much with these injuries, the replacement are about the size and height.

Size and height =/= defensive ability.

By the end of the year we were stating Olynyk at the 5, anad Agbaji or Brown at the 4. That is significantly smaller than Poeltl/Barnes.

Just hitting random gamelogs.. we started JFL/GTJ/Dick/Agabji/Olynyk one game lol. That is SOOOO much smaller than what we have now. The theoertical IQ/Walter/Dick/Barnes/Poeltl lineup is significantly bigger for the simple fact we dont have a SG/SF playing the 4 nor a PF playing C.


Kind of a nitpick, but I don't really think it's fair to say KO is a PF masquerading as a C. Any critique of his defense or evaluation of his playing style aside, the dude is 6'11" and 240lbs. If we're just talking about lineup size and where each guy slots in as far as the typical size for their position, KO is a centre through-and-through. He's a very large human.

Edit: I do agree that's a very small lineup, though.

In comparison to Poeltl though Olynyk is small.

Olynyk is 6'11 with a 6'10 wingspan. Per Draftexpress - the average SF was a 6'10" wingspan. Average PF is 7'0". C is 7'3". He is small for a center.

Poeltl is 7'1" with a 7"3" wingspan
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,569
And1: 52,028
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#798 » by WuTang_CMB » Mon Oct 21, 2024 1:26 pm

Read on Twitter


Darko Rajakovic said of his sophomore: “He intrigued me from the start. Thinking what kind of player he can be in the future, and how to maximize his potential.”

Rajakovic was echoing what Bobby Webster said on draft night so long ago. “I think we had Gradey in kind of his own– his own group. But, yeah, there was a– you know, I’m sure we’ll see how it all plays out over the next couple years. I think, probably, the size, shooting IQ, probably stood out a bit.” said Webster. “He’s not just a shooter. I think, you know, he knows how to play off the ball. He knows how to make, you know, backdoor cuts. He can pass well. He rebounds well. So I think he’s, you know, more of a well-rounded player, even though he’s probably going to get pegged early as just a shooter.”

By the way, above-the-break shooting is significantly more important than the corners. It allows drives to either side of the court against aggressive closeouts, it drags defenders away from the baseline and the rim, creates way more playmaking opportunities and for teambuilding purposes – it allows weaker shooters to occupy the corners where they might actually be able to hit a shot. It’s a huge deal that Dick is shaking his shot chart up and hitting well from there. Also, six of his eleven made triples from ATB came a full step or further from behind the line. Stretching the floor indeed.

“Gradey stretches out the floor. He brings a lot of attention. People are gonna have to respect him shooting the ball. That’s what he does.” said Barnes. “You know, being able to get downhill, or spread it out for threes or running actions for him, it’s just going to help our team out so much with the shooting and spacing the floor.”

Of course, shooting and spacing the floor isn’t the only way that Dick is able to help the Raptors. Those long, aggressive closeouts we talked about? He’s driving them. When players try and wall off the screens he’s taking up court? He’s back cutting them. He’s planting screens as often as possible (and has been the lynchpin back screener in spain actions). His touch at the rim has always been elite — even if the strength deficiencies (relative to other NBA players) make it hard for him to hold his ground there — and we’re seeing a vast array of finishes that include finger rolls with both hands over outstretched defenders, high kisses off the glass, and the reverse package has been on display for ages now.

“It’s definitely a talent, to know when to cut and when not to.” Gradey told me. “But, it’s really just watching your point guards, and guys with the ball in their hands. It’s playing off of them, seeing where they’re at on the court, if you can cut, try to open up the floor for them. Most of the time you’re not really cutting for your shot, you’re cutting to open up someone else’s. Hopefully that opens up space for you. At the end of the day, the more movement the better. If you’re kind of hesitating whether you’re gonna cut or not, most of the time you’re a second too late. It’s more about getting out there, moving around the court and trying to make shots for everyone else.”

Do teammates appreciate players who make the burn cut? “Of course.” Gradey said. “Extra movement gets people excited. You want to move on the court. You want to make defenses have to change stuff up.”
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 20,570
And1: 11,307
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#799 » by MEDIC » Mon Oct 21, 2024 1:51 pm

You have to be impressed with the speed that Gradey is improving.

That tells you a lot about his ability to analyze the game & figure out how to maximize his skillset within the NBA game. Also his work ethic.

All of these things are great indicators ls for future growth. He is only in his second season & has grown tremendously.

I fully expect him to be the Raptors MIP by end of season..
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,569
And1: 52,028
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: The Gradey Dick Thread Part 3 

Post#800 » by WuTang_CMB » Mon Oct 21, 2024 2:40 pm

Gradey has made incredible jumps in a lot of things in just 12 months. Excited what the next 12 months look for him.

Return to Toronto Raptors