F N 11 wrote:Crowd becoming a factor. Guys started moving their feet after the defense chants.
We were always gonna chill until the end tonight. Let's see if we have enough left.
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks

F N 11 wrote:Crowd becoming a factor. Guys started moving their feet after the defense chants.
Guano wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:well well well. shouldve traded for lavine for cheap like i said years ago but we got a broken mikal bridges instead with no picks until 2053.
impressive that you can come up with a better trade idea than the one we made


3toheadmelo wrote:Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:no
They’re 4-7!
about to be 5-7 and we're about to be 5-6 with significantly more talent than them
3toheadmelo wrote:Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:no
They’re 4-7!
about to be 5-7 and we're about to be 5-6 with significantly more talent than them
NiceLikeChrist wrote:it's one thing for mikal to be bad on defense and it's another thing for thibs to not realize this and still have him guard the primary ball handler night in and night out. we're over 10 games in now. this is the "defensive genius" coach. he doesn't see the glaring issues with out defense? why is he here then
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
KnicksGod wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Fury wrote:
They’re 4-7!
about to be 5-7 and we're about to be 5-6 with significantly more talent than them
But the only reason you’re harping on this is Randle who’s a bad defensive player.

Fury wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Fury wrote:
They’re 4-7!
about to be 5-7 and we're about to be 5-6 with significantly more talent than them
More talent, for example, Bridges > Lavine


ITGM wrote:Good things happen when "The Ghost of Randles' Past" is not on the floor.



