HMFFL wrote:Watch him play and look over his numbers.
I mean I'm sure we all have watched him play and the numbers are obviously there for a star PG. Again, when he has his most efficient night scoring wise, and put up an absurd number of assists, we've still lost games due to poor play throughout the roster. What a lot of Hawks don't want to admit, is that a lot of the "Hero" ball plays would go down if there was someone else stepping up to help lead the team or create opportunities.
HMFFL wrote:He's a sinkhole for any team unless they have a generational talent at the 5 and Trae would still be frustrating to play with.
Even if you don't like the way he plays, sinkhole is a bit absurd considering we have lacked a proper fit around Trae from the start. There's nothing in Trae's game that suggests he has to have a generational talent at the 5 in order to be successful. Clint on the playoff run wasn't a generational talent. I'm just not sure where that's coming from or why it's even a thing.
HMFFL wrote:We already know his preferred teams but Landry Fields can't move him because of the lack of value he has. Trae and Landry Fields are playing the waiting game together.
I highly doubt Trae lacks real value around the league. What's probably perceived as lacking in value, is more likely to be that Landry isn't just handing him over, and teams either can't afford him(LAL), are looking for a discount due to our lack of draft capital(NOP before Murray trade), or are betting on our downfall resulting in high FRP's(SAS). Regardless, this doesn't speak to how we're a better team without him.
HMFFL wrote:You want to see more Nance and OO? I love Nance, always have, he's the dawg every team needs, but he's a career role player.
Doesn't matter if Nance is a career role player. We need good role players anyway. We've lacked those since the Gallo, Bogi, and Lou Will run.