ImageImage

Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 28,017
And1: 18,400
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#421 » by RiotPunch » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:16 am

This team's signature win was beating the Texans, which is not looking overly impressive now.

Hopefully our true signature wins come in the playoffs, but we're not looking ready for the moment. Starts with LaFleur and Jordan. Jacobs setting the tone with the fumble sure didn't help things.
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,907
And1: 4,705
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#422 » by MVP2110 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:21 am

I think it's understated how much missing Watson effected the offense. Having a true deep threat opens up so much in an offense that otherwise isn't there. Similar to how our offense performed when we had MVS vs when he was hurt(we scored significantly more when MVS played). When there isn't a deep threat available it becomes much easier for the defense to clog up the offense. There was a lot that Green Bay could have done to win this game(Jacobs fumble, Reed drop, etc.) but nobody seems to discuss Watson being out.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,326
And1: 3,785
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#423 » by tski1972 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:22 am

Ron Swanson wrote:
tski1972 wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:
Maybe we’re a one and done team but we absolutely did not have a favorable schedule this season.


I mean, their best wins are against the Rams who weren’t at full strength and the disappointing Texans. The schedule has totally been in their favor.


By what definition? They’ve literally had the 4th hardest schedule in the league.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/fpi/_/sort/fpi.avgsosrank/dir/asc


By the definition of when they’ve played teams. Yes, some of the teams on the schedule are considered strong opponents, but at the time the game was actually played it was favorable to the Packers.

Seven of their eleven wins are against teams with losing records. The Rams were 1-3 when we beat them and it was almost a home game in LA. Miami was at home in the cold. So really the Houston and Seattle games were really the only “pick ‘em” games they came out on top.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,685
And1: 8,234
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#424 » by Mags FTW » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:29 am

MLF said in the post-game the Vikings played a lot more man instead of zone and he wasn't prepared for it.
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,907
And1: 4,705
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#425 » by MVP2110 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:34 am

Mags FTW wrote:MLF said in the post-game the Vikings played a lot more man instead of zone and he wasn't prepared for it.



Robert Mays noted this during the game. In their first meeting Minnesota played more zone than in any other game this season. This time they completely flipped the gameplan and played more man than in any other game this season.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,837
And1: 42,912
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#426 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:34 am

Mags FTW wrote:MLF said in the post-game the Vikings played a lot more man instead of zone and he wasn't prepared for it.


Love when coaches just admit their stupidity.
User avatar
tski1972
Head Coach
Posts: 6,326
And1: 3,785
Joined: May 24, 2011
Location: Wow-saw, WI
Contact:
     

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#427 » by tski1972 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:43 am

Mags FTW wrote:MLF said in the post-game the Vikings played a lot more man instead of zone and he wasn't prepared for it.


Hey Matty, you are allowed to adjust things once the game starts.
http://twitter.com/MarkIsOld

Image

"Because of Giannis, the once lousy Bucks are back in the NBA conversation." - 60 Minutes
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 28,274
And1: 15,788
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#428 » by rilamann » Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:56 am

MLF's game plan this week for the Vikings was telling the Packers how awesome they were for beating up on the Saints.

Maybe that wasn't the actual game plan but it sure looked like it.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
thonnisbeastley
Rookie
Posts: 1,031
And1: 716
Joined: Oct 09, 2016

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#429 » by thonnisbeastley » Mon Dec 30, 2024 2:12 am

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:I'm not down on the D overall here. Held them to 13 in the first and would've been 10 if we didn't **** up with a penalty to give them a FG shot. had some big stops and TOs and held them to 27. it wasn't a great showing but not the reason we lost. it was the offense and penalities like the offsides on the FG. if you told me the Packers held them the Vikings to 24 or 27 points, I would've been ok with it.

That wasn't a penalty. Was a horse **** offsides call.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,985
And1: 30,377
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#430 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 3:21 am

MVP2110 wrote:I think it's understated how much missing Watson effected the offense.


It played a role.But there were some bad coaching mistakes also. Would not have gone for it on that 4th down. Also, we had the ball with 2 minutes left before the half, was a 3rd and 5. MLF and Love decide to go on that badly schemed deep ball, which gave the ball back to MN with plenty of time for them to drive. Then the penalty that allowed a 2nd FG attempt.

This whole year has been filled with dumb mistakes and misfires. You give them this season for experience, but then it has to be worked out by next year.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
MVP2110
General Manager
Posts: 8,907
And1: 4,705
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#431 » by MVP2110 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 3:27 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:I think it's understated how much missing Watson effected the offense.


It played a role.But there were some bad coaching mistakes also. Would not have gone for it on that 4th down. Also, we had the ball with 2 minutes left before the half, was a 3rd and 5. MLF and Love decide to go on that badly schemed deep ball, which gave the ball back to MN with plenty of time for them to drive. Then the penalty that allowed a 2nd FG attempt.

This whole year has been filled with dumb mistakes and misfires. You give them this season for experience, but then it has to be worked out by next year.


This specific decision to me is interesting because I'm the opposite, I hate that MLF "took the points" early in this game. I truly think MLF's lack of aggressiveness cost the Packers against Detroit.

That said in this game the take the points or go for it discussion has valid points both ways and both sides can claim that MLF made the wrong decision and it cost them.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 28,073
And1: 13,724
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#432 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Mon Dec 30, 2024 3:35 am

thonnisbeastley wrote:
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:I'm not down on the D overall here. Held them to 13 in the first and would've been 10 if we didn't **** up with a penalty to give them a FG shot. had some big stops and TOs and held them to 27. it wasn't a great showing but not the reason we lost. it was the offense and penalities like the offsides on the FG. if you told me the Packers held them the Vikings to 24 or 27 points, I would've been ok with it.

That wasn't a penalty. Was a horse **** offsides call.

well my point is the defense basically held them to 10 points in the first half despite an early fumble and momentum. the defense didn't play great, but they played good enough to win
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,702
And1: 11,045
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#433 » by HKPackFan » Mon Dec 30, 2024 6:44 am

Love was subpar for 7 quarters. He had a great 4th quarter, but he wasn't great last week, lots of misses and the first 3 quarters he was off as well.


Overall 2 games this season Minny has been the superior team.
#FreeChuckDiesel
CWoodfan
Junior
Posts: 378
And1: 329
Joined: Aug 30, 2017
 

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#434 » by CWoodfan » Mon Dec 30, 2024 7:09 am

MLF said in his post-game news conference that Addison and Jefferson are both legitimate #1 WRs.

MLF bristled when he was asked about whether the Packers had a #1 WR prior to the start of the season.

In looking at the rosters of the two teams, the talent discrepancy at WR might be the biggest gap.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,702
And1: 11,045
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#435 » by HKPackFan » Mon Dec 30, 2024 7:14 am

This game knocked my expectations down to earth.

This team is young and plays young. They have a quarter or two where they can beat any team in the league. Yet they don't have the consistency to do it for 60 minutes.

Sure with the talent they have they can potentially win a couple of playoff games, but they still have some work to do. They aren't quite there yet.
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,381
And1: 7,481
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#436 » by FAH1223 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 7:43 am

HKPackFan wrote:This game knocked my expectations down to earth.

This team is young and plays young. They have a quarter or two where they can beat any team in the league. Yet they don't have the consistency to do it for 60 minutes.

Sure with the talent they have they can potentially win a couple of playoff games, but they still have some work to do. They aren't quite there yet.


My expectations were shattered when they lost to Detroit the 2nd time on TNF

Youngest team in the league, playing young, doing stupid stuff. It is expected but frustrating.

And seeing how Gary and Clark are stealing $$$ pisses me off. No pass rush, no chance.

Hopefully the Wild Card is entertaining. Fully expecting the Eagles to wash the Pack
Image
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,167
And1: 2,729
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#437 » by Daver » Mon Dec 30, 2024 8:28 am

If pack wins sundsy n wash loses pack has 6 seed again correct if both win wash jas 6th seed yes.
Eagles will curb stomp the packers thry put up 38 on the pack the 1st game b4 they got the run game going bad matchup i wanted the 6th seed but beating rams wasnt a given either eith love n MLF
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,167
And1: 2,729
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#438 » by Daver » Mon Dec 30, 2024 8:30 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:I think it's understated how much missing Watson effected the offense.


It played a role.But there were some bad coaching mistakes also. Would not have gone for it on that 4th down. Also, we had the ball with 2 minutes left before the half, was a 3rd and 5. MLF and Love decide to go on that badly schemed deep ball, which gave the ball back to MN with plenty of time for them to drive. Then the penalty that allowed a 2nd FG attempt.

This whole year has been filled with dumb mistakes and misfires. You give them this season for experience, but then it has to be worked out by next year.



How many more years you given MLF its been the same excuse every year in big games nothing has changed with him with his PC his mental fu.. so now we give him anothrr year.N next year same mistakes same in game decisions what give him another year
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,702
And1: 11,045
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#439 » by HKPackFan » Mon Dec 30, 2024 9:12 am

FAH1223 wrote:
HKPackFan wrote:This game knocked my expectations down to earth.

This team is young and plays young. They have a quarter or two where they can beat any team in the league. Yet they don't have the consistency to do it for 60 minutes.

Sure with the talent they have they can potentially win a couple of playoff games, but they still have some work to do. They aren't quite there yet.


My expectations were shattered when they lost to Detroit the 2nd time on TNF

Youngest team in the league, playing young, doing stupid stuff. It is expected but frustrating.

And seeing how Gary and Clark are stealing $$$ pisses me off. No pass rush, no chance.

Hopefully the Wild Card is entertaining. Fully expecting the Eagles to wash the Pack



The Pass Rush was tough to watch. Getting Picked apart today was painful to witness. Just too easy.
#FreeChuckDiesel
coolhandluke121
RealGM
Posts: 14,314
And1: 7,459
Joined: Sep 23, 2007

Re: Game 16: Packers at Vikings - 12/29/24 - 3:25 - FOX 

Post#440 » by coolhandluke121 » Mon Dec 30, 2024 10:24 am

I legit had to look up the stats to see if LVN even played. Is he Gute's worst pick at this point?
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.

Return to Green Bay Packers