msiris wrote:Between Mids and Beal the 6th man role has become very expensive. LOL Come to think of we now have 2 6th men. 6A and 6B.
let's get rid of 6B for a defensive 4/5
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
msiris wrote:Between Mids and Beal the 6th man role has become very expensive. LOL Come to think of we now have 2 6th men. 6A and 6B.
yannisk wrote:msiris wrote:Between Mids and Beal the 6th man role has become very expensive. LOL Come to think of we now have 2 6th men. 6A and 6B.
let's get rid of 6B for a defensive 4/5
yannisk wrote:msiris wrote:Between Mids and Beal the 6th man role has become very expensive. LOL Come to think of we now have 2 6th men. 6A and 6B.
let's get rid of 6B for a defensive 4/5
raferfenix wrote:So based on the Spurs game alone:
Khris + Bobby + Pat for Jimmy would be almost purely additive.
Profound23 wrote:yannisk wrote:msiris wrote:Between Mids and Beal the 6th man role has become very expensive. LOL Come to think of we now have 2 6th men. 6A and 6B.
let's get rid of 6B for a defensive 4/5
Trading Khris for a defensive 4/5 means we have a logjam at the 4/5 spot, unless you're thinking of putting Giannis at SF.
ShootingtheJ wrote:Dealing Bobby for a combo forward has always been the play. 3 team deal, throw in our 2031 1st if needed.
slos wrote:Looking for upgrades obviously Jimmy is nice, but maybe it’s just better settling for a cheap starting SF to replace Prince.
ShootingtheJ wrote:raferfenix wrote:So based on the Spurs game alone:
Khris + Bobby + Pat for Jimmy would be almost purely additive.
The Bucks absolutely rolled last night when Khris was in, especially when he was playing PG.
Dealing Bobby for a combo forward has always been the play. 3 team deal, throw in our 2031 1st if needed.
As for backup center, I still like the Spurs Charles Bassey.
mlloyd10 wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:raferfenix wrote:So based on the Spurs game alone:
Khris + Bobby + Pat for Jimmy would be almost purely additive.
The Bucks absolutely rolled last night when Khris was in, especially when he was playing PG.
Dealing Bobby for a combo forward has always been the play. 3 team deal, throw in our 2031 1st if needed.
As for backup center, I still like the Spurs Charles Bassey.
1. admit you are Khris Middleton
2. This is why the +/- stat sucks...Watching the game yesterday, you saw that Bobby and Khris both looked really bad.
3. You keep mentioning the playoffs last year..easier to get those numbers when you #1 didn't play at all
4. We all like Middleton, but can his health be trusted,
Ron Swanson wrote:Why are we taking on Wiggins' contract with such little incentive though? Or are we doing the pendulum thing and buying into him as a plus value player/asset again? Now that he's about to be on the wrong side of 30, I want no part of the Andrew Wiggins roller-coaster. At least with that proposed Beal trade to facilitate Jimmy to PHX, we're getting a good prospect and a 1st round pick.
slos wrote:Chemistry looks better with Midds coming from the bench. It’s nice when teams are done with Dame/Giannis having to face Midds too.
I also like Doc splitting Brook/Bobby time according to matchups and performance. It’s something new when you are used to Bud’s standard rotations no matter what happens in the court.
AJJ/Green/Trent have also adopted in their roles and have become super useful pieces.
Looking for upgrades obviously Jimmy is nice, but maybe it’s just better settling for a cheap starting SF to replace Prince.
tydett wrote:I don't really want to think about it, but there's a distinct possibility that the Bucks' most valuable asset is actually AJ Green,
ShootingtheJ wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Why are we taking on Wiggins' contract with such little incentive though? Or are we doing the pendulum thing and buying into him as a plus value player/asset again? Now that he's about to be on the wrong side of 30, I want no part of the Andrew Wiggins roller-coaster. At least with that proposed Beal trade to facilitate Jimmy to PHX, we're getting a good prospect and a 1st round pick.
What's the other proposal you're referring to?