ImageImageImageImageImage

Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY!

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,384
And1: 56,974
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1281 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:28 pm

Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Guano wrote:meLo is going to remember the 2024 jan knicks like sham recalls May of 1957 when the Lorillard Tobacco Company released newport cigerettes.




sham only posting in losses and actually waiting to see if Mitch stays with the team is pretty pathetic. I didn't have respect for him before, but now I'm thinking of putting money on the books of his fellow inmates to make sure his stay is less than ideal.



it was fairly predictable that all sham needed to rise from the dead was negativity. 3 loses in a row is the equivalent of saying candyman



I hope the parole board denies him.


#DontFreeSham
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,645
And1: 67,042
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1282 » by Guano » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:39 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


sham only posting in losses and actually waiting to see if Mitch stays with the team is pretty pathetic. I didn't have respect for him before, but now I'm thinking of putting money on the books of his fellow inmates to make sure his stay is less than ideal.



it was fairly predictable that all sham needed to rise from the dead was negativity. 3 loses in a row is the equivalent of saying candyman



I hope the parole board denies him.


#DontFreeSham


if there is any justice in the world he will never reunite with his true love
Image
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 5,765
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1283 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:41 pm

This thread isn’t nearly as bold or violent or entertaining as they designed it to be, but it’ll still go down as one of the most meaningful and revealing threads in realgm history :lol:
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1284 » by nykballa2k4 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:44 pm

Guano wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Guano wrote:Were struggling in 4th. You know who were missing. The guy who is now getting benched in 4th on a .500 team.
Read on Twitter

Yeah we’d blow teams out left and right and be contenders with him :lol: last January we did. I don’t care about December 2024, I only care about January 2024, capiche?


the caveat is Jan'24 was only repeatable with ayton... the blueprint was there if only leon had the vision. now we're doooomed.


Feel bad for Randle. He helped rebuild our team and we trade him at his peak value, and now he has to deal with those fools.

He certainly isn't getting that extension and he will have to be in the same decision making train as Jimmy about whether to opt in, or to see what he can get free market. Hard to see a player, as good as Julius is, getting a good offer from a decent team.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 5,765
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1285 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:07 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
Guano wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:Yeah we’d blow teams out left and right and be contenders with him :lol: last January we did. I don’t care about December 2024, I only care about January 2024, capiche?


the caveat is Jan'24 was only repeatable with ayton... the blueprint was there if only leon had the vision. now we're doooomed.


Feel bad for Randle. He helped rebuild our team and we trade him at his peak value, and now he has to deal with those fools.

He certainly isn't getting that extension and he will have to be in the same decision making train as Jimmy about whether to opt in, or to see what he can get free market. Hard to see a player, as good as Julius is, getting a good offer from a decent team.

I’d confidently make the argument that it’s the other way round. Randle looks very much like the fool here… They were much better last season. Who wants to add this player:



?

This team became relevant the moment they signed Brunson. Randle and RJ were a laughing stock without him. The second step was taken with OG. Third, Towns and Bridges.
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,864
And1: 4,764
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1286 » by The KnicksFix » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:23 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:This thread isn’t nearly as bold or violent or entertaining as they designed it to be, but it’ll still go down as one of the most meaningful and revealing threads in realgm history :lol:


Me and Melo squaring up in other random threads is kinda funny
Low key, I need Melo around to raise my blood pressure every 3 days, else it wouldn’t feel right :lol: :lol: :roll: :roll:
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1287 » by nykballa2k4 » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:24 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
Guano wrote:
the caveat is Jan'24 was only repeatable with ayton... the blueprint was there if only leon had the vision. now we're doooomed.


Feel bad for Randle. He helped rebuild our team and we trade him at his peak value, and now he has to deal with those fools.

He certainly isn't getting that extension and he will have to be in the same decision making train as Jimmy about whether to opt in, or to see what he can get free market. Hard to see a player, as good as Julius is, getting a good offer from a decent team.

I’d confidently make the argument that it’s the other way round. Randle looks very much like the fool here… They were much better last season. Who wants to add this player:



?

This team became relevant the moment they signed Brunson. Randle and RJ were a laughing stock without him. The second step was taken with OG. Third, Towns and Bridges.


randle plays well with a real point guard. hell hes even good with Elf or the corpse of Drose.

He is shooting above his career average from 3. He is playing well overall. He just has these malfunctions. Not as bad as Ray Feltons double clutch into the stands or whatever that was from his bobcats days.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,864
And1: 4,764
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1288 » by The KnicksFix » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:25 pm

epics2002 wrote:Dadiet and Sims for Cam Johnson who says no?


I wanted Cam Johnson too, but then I saw he makes 23 mil and we can’t make salaries match
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 5,765
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1289 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:58 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
Feel bad for Randle. He helped rebuild our team and we trade him at his peak value, and now he has to deal with those fools.

He certainly isn't getting that extension and he will have to be in the same decision making train as Jimmy about whether to opt in, or to see what he can get free market. Hard to see a player, as good as Julius is, getting a good offer from a decent team.

I’d confidently make the argument that it’s the other way round. Randle looks very much like the fool here… They were much better last season. Who wants to add this player:



?

This team became relevant the moment they signed Brunson. Randle and RJ were a laughing stock without him. The second step was taken with OG. Third, Towns and Bridges.


randle plays well with a real point guard. hell hes even good with Elf or the corpse of Drose.

He is shooting above his career average from 3. He is playing well overall. He just has these malfunctions. Not as bad as Ray Feltons double clutch into the stands or whatever that was from his bobcats days.

What exactly tells you that he plays well with a point guard? His stats on very bad teams? Or this: https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/julius-randle-career-winning-percentage
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,808
And1: 19,367
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1290 » by KnicksGadfly » Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:50 pm

nykballa2k4 wrote:
Guano wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:Yeah we’d blow teams out left and right and be contenders with him :lol: last January we did. I don’t care about December 2024, I only care about January 2024, capiche?


the caveat is Jan'24 was only repeatable with ayton... the blueprint was there if only leon had the vision. now we're doooomed.


Feel bad for Randle. He helped rebuild our team and we trade him at his peak value, and now he has to deal with those fools.

He certainly isn't getting that extension and he will have to be in the same decision making train as Jimmy about whether to opt in, or to see what he can get free market. Hard to see a player, as good as Julius is, getting a good offer from a decent team.


Eh, Randle had several years to change the Knicks' minds. He didn't want it enough. The Knicks also didn't do him dirty...they gave him a lot of chances, more than he really deserved.

Knicks fans aren't as awful as people make them out to be. At the end, people still wanted to extend Randle before he got traded.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,107
And1: 137,834
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1291 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:03 am

Buttah304 wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


A 7 game sample size? Brother, you need to let that Jan stuff go, that team wasn't going to win anything and everyone knows it, even the front office knew it. That team would have been the equivalent of the 60 win Hawk team.


Image

Image
The Knicks front office in 2014 also thought it was a good idea to change our identity that won us 54 games and we saw how that ended. We’re just replaying the same scenario but 10 years later. The never ending cycle of the mid knicks. We finally had a championship contender and we blew it all away to be the Sacramento Knicks. Next up we’re gonna scapegoat Thibs like we did to Mike Woodson and go through another coaching drought for the next 8 years.


Can you explain to me, and I’m genuinely asking, how this would be a championship contender without iHart? Replacing Holmgren is no easy task, yet he’s filled in admirably going 22-2 with OKC in the SL.

There is simply no feasible, logical, mythical or fantastical way that DeAndre Ayton or Myles Turner could have mirrored what iHart did for us last year had we kept the same team & traded for one of them this season.

They don’t nearly have the same DFG% at the rim, offensive rebounding, consistent boxing out/putting a body on someone, flawless screen setting ability, elbow passing, shot tipping, and high IQ/winning plays that Hartenstein has.

For all the talk about Mikals defense, and the never ending reminiscing you do about last year, you easily forget how often we complained about DDV defense. The unnecessary gambling, getting beat back door, posted up, and just moved physically due to lack of size.

I only bring up DDV because Brunson and Randle defensively are both below average, but their effectiveness or lack-thereof was mitigated by OG/iHart being smothering blankets.

And with this January stuff, it’s as if you hold that Knicks group in that same light as the 20-21 Denver team that went 26-5 in February and March (felt they could win a title) and then Murray got devastatingly injured, missed the following season and when he did come back they indeed won the championship.

You really think running it back with DeAndre Ayton in place of iHart, no Precious for nearly 2 months, no Mitch, and an often-injured McBride would be a championship contender?

It’s as if you’re saying that Randle/DDV were so unbelievably impactful but why is it that Minnesota is now 21-19 but last year they were 30-10. Are we saying that those players SpaceJam like special abilities only come out under Thibs?

Don’t get me wrong last years January was a great run, but we beat up Denver and Philly badly just like we did this year. Who else was such an amazing win in your eyes?

We beat The Houston Rockets who were 19-22 at the time.

We beat Miami who had lost 6 CONSECUTIVE games coming into our matchup they were 22-21.

The Minnesota game was a perfect storm. OGs first appearance just cutting/moving without knowing any of the players and Randle was phenomenal down the stretch.

We still got blown out by Dallas with no Luka and lost to Orlando with no Franz.

Listen, I think it’s normal for everyone to wax poetic about a time in their life when they could have gone left instead of right. Could have taken the road less traveled. But in the same respect when talking about a prior love things always seemed sweeter than they were. Thats the crux of you not letting go of a 30 day January team. You were in love with that group, you still are, and even though it’s in your best interest to let go you would rather stay encapsulated in that fleeting moment.

You're extremely overrating Ihart. Last season he had a DFG% of 57.8% protecting the rim which is literally the same as Ayton this season and actually WORSE than Nick Richards and Myles turner this season. You're making it seem like iHart was prime Hakeem :lol:
And what's sad about this is that KAT's DFG% at protecting the rim is the worst in the league as a starting C at 68.4%. Love his offensive game, but you're smoking something laced if you think you can win a chip with that type of rim protection.

DDV's defense was suspect last season, no disagreement there. But you're missing one big thing. HE HITS 3's! Mikal not being able to hit 3's makes us worse because teams are leaving him wide open with his broken shot and nobody is putting a body on him. Much easier to trap Brunson and KAT. Same way teams do to Josh Hart.

Thibs absolutely brings the best out of his players, and I'm not sure why you or anyone would argue otherwise. Which player has left the Knicks and looked better? Thibs made Randle into a 25/10/5 2x all NBA player. Made Donte look like one of the best 4th options in the league. Made IQ look like a 6th man of the year candidate. Made Nerlens Noel, Reggie bullock and Elfrid Payton look serviceable for crying out loud.

Beating the Heat was a big deal for us last year because they were literally coming off a finals appearance.
We lost to Dallas by 4, we didn't get blown out. Don't lie fam.
Brunson didn't even play against Orlando, so I'm not even sure why you would mention that.
We acually blew out Denver, a team who just won the chip without iHart, the same guy you think is Hakeem. :lol:


All I know is that you guys keep changing the goal posts for this mid Knicks team. First it was, "it's too early in the season!" as a weak excuse for our trash defense, now it's "OUR PLAYERS ARE TOO TIRED TO PLAY DEFENSE" :lol: at least I'm being consistent. You guys find an excuse for anything but admitting this team was poorly built. Can't wait for us to scapegoat Thibs and we look even worse than ever.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,107
And1: 137,834
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1292 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:08 am

Chanel Bomber wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


A 7 game sample size? Brother, you need to let that Jan stuff go, that team wasn't going to win anything and everyone knows it, even the front office knew it. That team would have been the equivalent of the 60 win Hawk team.


Image

Image
The Knicks front office in 2014 also thought it was a good idea to change our identity that won us 54 games and we saw how that ended. We’re just replaying the same scenario but 10 years later. The never ending cycle of the mid knicks. We finally had a championship contender and we blew it all away to be the Sacramento Knicks. Next up we’re gonna scapegoat Thibs like we did to Mike Woodson and go through another coaching drought for the next 8 years.

The Knicks were forced to change their identity.

They couldn't keep iHart and Mitch got hurt.

:lol: at Randle being the identity of last year's team, the man doesn't defend nor crash the offensive glass. This is nasty work even by your standards but nobody's buying what you're selling, it's like those obvious, fake Celtics jerseys folks sell for 20 bucks.

Once again, IHart was easily replaceable. Acting like he was the identity of our team is crazy. Brunson, OG, Randle were the identity. Thibs had them boys looking like the best orchestrated symphony we've seen from a Knicks team in over a decade. Anyone denying that is bugging.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,107
And1: 137,834
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1293 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:11 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


A 7 game sample size? Brother, you need to let that Jan stuff go, that team wasn't going to win anything and everyone knows it, even the front office knew it. That team would have been the equivalent of the 60 win Hawk team.


Image

Image
The Knicks front office in 2014 also thought it was a good idea to change our identity that won us 54 games and we saw how that ended. We’re just replaying the same scenario but 10 years later. The never ending cycle of the mid knicks. We finally had a championship contender and we blew it all away to be the Sacramento Knicks. Next up we’re gonna scapegoat Thibs like we did to Mike Woodson and go through another coaching drought for the next 8 years.



Brother, that team was not a championship contender, the same way the Clippers weren't/aren't a contender despite being net 1 & 3 at two different points last season, the Warriors last season were 11-3 and net rating 3 in Feb. Are the Warriors a contender right now because of 1 hot month last season? You're using a small sample size, and not the talent on the team because we actually see how a lot of those former Knicks are playing. The most impactful player we lost is in OKC, and we were never keeping him.

I'm trying to save you again; you're tying your wagon to losing campaigns. Look at the reception you got for finally acknowledging the greatness of Big Purr over REDACTED, now you're defending Tom. You got his former players like Pierce and KG **** on him, why would you want to defend a coach that is clearly overplaying guys? When an injury inevitably happens, don't get out on the street marching for him because we'll be out for blood.


Image

Fam I'm trying to save you. This Knicks team is mid and everyone around the league knows it. Literally winless against the top 4 teams of each conference. Ain't nobody taking us seriously. Blaming the coach is just an easy way out of escaping admission that this team sucks. That's what we did in 2014. You need to see the light bredren.
Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,107
And1: 137,834
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1294 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 12:12 am

Guano wrote:meLo is going to remember the 2024 jan knicks like sham recalls May of 1957 when the Lorillard Tobacco Company released newport cigerettes.

Im standing on business everytime!
Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,384
And1: 56,974
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1295 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 18, 2025 1:19 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Image
The Knicks front office in 2014 also thought it was a good idea to change our identity that won us 54 games and we saw how that ended. We’re just replaying the same scenario but 10 years later. The never ending cycle of the mid knicks. We finally had a championship contender and we blew it all away to be the Sacramento Knicks. Next up we’re gonna scapegoat Thibs like we did to Mike Woodson and go through another coaching drought for the next 8 years.



Brother, that team was not a championship contender, the same way the Clippers weren't/aren't a contender despite being net 1 & 3 at two different points last season, the Warriors last season were 11-3 and net rating 3 in Feb. Are the Warriors a contender right now because of 1 hot month last season? You're using a small sample size, and not the talent on the team because we actually see how a lot of those former Knicks are playing. The most impactful player we lost is in OKC, and we were never keeping him.

I'm trying to save you again; you're tying your wagon to losing campaigns. Look at the reception you got for finally acknowledging the greatness of Big Purr over REDACTED, now you're defending Tom. You got his former players like Pierce and KG **** on him, why would you want to defend a coach that is clearly overplaying guys? When an injury inevitably happens, don't get out on the street marching for him because we'll be out for blood.


Image

Fam I'm trying to save you. This Knicks team is mid and everyone around the league knows it. Literally winless against the top 4 teams of each conference. Ain't nobody taking us seriously. Blaming the coach is just an easy way out of escaping admission that this team sucks. That's what we did in 2014. You need to see the light bredren.
Image




I saved you from the KAT vs REDACTED stuff, you were going down a path of destruction with that. I told you before you can't use the reversal play on me, I know the game too well. The team is 27-15 and Vegas has them as a favorite to win the title, you're spinning a narrative that doesn't exist. However almost everyone agrees that if Tom keeps playing these guys like this we won't make it to the playoffs healthy.


Image
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,015
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1296 » by Chanel Bomber » Sat Jan 18, 2025 1:56 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Image
The Knicks front office in 2014 also thought it was a good idea to change our identity that won us 54 games and we saw how that ended. We’re just replaying the same scenario but 10 years later. The never ending cycle of the mid knicks. We finally had a championship contender and we blew it all away to be the Sacramento Knicks. Next up we’re gonna scapegoat Thibs like we did to Mike Woodson and go through another coaching drought for the next 8 years.

The Knicks were forced to change their identity.

They couldn't keep iHart and Mitch got hurt.

:lol: at Randle being the identity of last year's team, the man doesn't defend nor crash the offensive glass. This is nasty work even by your standards but nobody's buying what you're selling, it's like those obvious, fake Celtics jerseys folks sell for 20 bucks.

Once again, IHart was easily replaceable. Acting like he was the identity of our team is crazy. Brunson, OG, Randle were the identity. Thibs had them boys looking like the best orchestrated symphony we've seen from a Knicks team in over a decade. Anyone denying that is bugging.

He was not easily replaceable. He was one of the best centers in the league.

The Knicks were good on defense and with offensive rebounding. Those were the areas where they stood out. They were a mediocre team scoring-wise both in terms of eFG% or scoring efficiency. They just took more shots because of the offensive rebounding edge.

Randle didn't play defense, didn't have an impact on the offensive glass, and didn't elevate the team's offensive efficiency.

He helped the team, mostly as a secondary playmaker, but he was always less of a factor than Brunson and our centers who provided most of our defense and offensive rebounding.

And now you see how iHart (along with Caruso) is elevating OKC and taking their defense from really good to historically great.

Meanwhile Randle is killing Minnesota's defense, killing their spacing, while providing solid production on the ball but not enough to offset those negative effects.

The metrics bear it out, everybody can see it, not even Knicks fans, the trade was a robbery in our advantage. You're all alone bro, Twitter randos don't count :-?
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1297 » by nykballa2k4 » Sat Jan 18, 2025 1:57 am

spree2kawhi wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:I’d confidently make the argument that it’s the other way round. Randle looks very much like the fool here… They were much better last season. Who wants to add this player:



?

This team became relevant the moment they signed Brunson. Randle and RJ were a laughing stock without him. The second step was taken with OG. Third, Towns and Bridges.


randle plays well with a real point guard. hell hes even good with Elf or the corpse of Drose.

He is shooting above his career average from 3. He is playing well overall. He just has these malfunctions. Not as bad as Ray Feltons double clutch into the stands or whatever that was from his bobcats days.

What exactly tells you that he plays well with a point guard? His stats on very bad teams? Or this: https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/julius-randle-career-winning-percentage


Stats when we had a healthy DRose vs the following year where we had Burks playing fake point guard. Then Brunson got here and he looked great again. He is a capable passer, but when he is running the point he is prone to make errors.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,107
And1: 137,834
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1298 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 3:24 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

Brother, that team was not a championship contender, the same way the Clippers weren't/aren't a contender despite being net 1 & 3 at two different points last season, the Warriors last season were 11-3 and net rating 3 in Feb. Are the Warriors a contender right now because of 1 hot month last season? You're using a small sample size, and not the talent on the team because we actually see how a lot of those former Knicks are playing. The most impactful player we lost is in OKC, and we were never keeping him.

I'm trying to save you again; you're tying your wagon to losing campaigns. Look at the reception you got for finally acknowledging the greatness of Big Purr over REDACTED, now you're defending Tom. You got his former players like Pierce and KG **** on him, why would you want to defend a coach that is clearly overplaying guys? When an injury inevitably happens, don't get out on the street marching for him because we'll be out for blood.


Image

Fam I'm trying to save you. This Knicks team is mid and everyone around the league knows it. Literally winless against the top 4 teams of each conference. Ain't nobody taking us seriously. Blaming the coach is just an easy way out of escaping admission that this team sucks. That's what we did in 2014. You need to see the light bredren.
Image




I saved you from the KAT vs REDACTED stuff, you were going down a path of destruction with that. I told you before you can't use the reversal play on me, I know the game too well. The team is 27-15 and Vegas has them as a favorite to win the title, you're spinning a narrative that doesn't exist. However almost everyone agrees that if Tom keeps playing these guys like this we won't make it to the playoffs healthy.


Image

:lol: Now we using Vegas to try and justify how good this team is. You know damn well we not the favorite to win a title. You literally saw what happened against Minny just now.

Thibs overplaying guys is an issue, but that's not even the closest to our biggest problems. This roster ain't it.
Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,107
And1: 137,834
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1299 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 18, 2025 3:26 am

Chanel Bomber wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:The Knicks were forced to change their identity.

They couldn't keep iHart and Mitch got hurt.

:lol: at Randle being the identity of last year's team, the man doesn't defend nor crash the offensive glass. This is nasty work even by your standards but nobody's buying what you're selling, it's like those obvious, fake Celtics jerseys folks sell for 20 bucks.

Once again, IHart was easily replaceable. Acting like he was the identity of our team is crazy. Brunson, OG, Randle were the identity. Thibs had them boys looking like the best orchestrated symphony we've seen from a Knicks team in over a decade. Anyone denying that is bugging.

He was not easily replaceable. He was one of the best centers in the league.


You lost me there. Dude averaged 7.8 PPG and 8.3 RPG and you're saying he was one of the best centers in the league??
Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,384
And1: 56,974
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Ex-Knicks, Sh**posts, and Old Trades - OH MY! 

Post#1300 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 18, 2025 3:31 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Fam I'm trying to save you. This Knicks team is mid and everyone around the league knows it. Literally winless against the top 4 teams of each conference. Ain't nobody taking us seriously. Blaming the coach is just an easy way out of escaping admission that this team sucks. That's what we did in 2014. You need to see the light bredren.
Image




I saved you from the KAT vs REDACTED stuff, you were going down a path of destruction with that. I told you before you can't use the reversal play on me, I know the game too well. The team is 27-15 and Vegas has them as a favorite to win the title, you're spinning a narrative that doesn't exist. However almost everyone agrees that if Tom keeps playing these guys like this we won't make it to the playoffs healthy.


Image

:lol: Now we using Vegas to try and justify how good this team is. You know damn well we not the favorite to win a title. You literally saw what happened against Minny just now.

Thibs overplaying guys is an issue, but that's not even the closest to our biggest problems. This roster ain't it.
Image




Yes, we're using Vegas because money riding on things is the best way to gauge things. You're trying to use a game where KAT is out to prove anything? The only thing it proved is that KAT isn't the problem with the defense, the coach is. You cannot defend Tom anymore, it's ridiculous at this point. He's conceding the three point shot trying to protect the paint no matter who is playing, last season teams were shooting 37.2% from three before Mitch got hurt.

If we don't contend it's not because of the roster, it's because the coach thinks this is 1996 and has no idea how to defend teams that take threes at a high volume. That has been a problem with him since he's been here, through multiple roster iterations, is as big of a problem as his minutes.


Image

Return to New York Knicks