Iwasawitness wrote:michaelm wrote:Iwasawitness wrote:
…it ISN’T up for debate. It’s a literal fact that LeBron tried staying in Cleveland first. You not wanting it to be the case doesn’t make it so. I don’t make the rules regarding how reality works.
And because LeBron didn’t go to the team that he choked to in the playoffs and was a 73 win team. This isn’t rocket science. Don’t let blind fanboyism make you die on this hill.
I will have you know I am a Curry fanboy rather than a Durant fanboy. And I bow to your obvious superior expertise in blind fanboyism. It has been my experience btw that resorting to argumentum ad hominem is not commonly a sign that the party concerned is winning the debate. I am actually amused and pleased to be called a fanboy for defending Durant on an obvious troll/agenda thread started purely to denigrate him, but it would seem likely you are not very familiar with the concept of irony.
As I have said on numerous occasions LeBron was never going to be given what he needed and was his due at the Cavs the first time and was entirely entitled to leave after giving them nearly a decade of his best efforts, and could go wherever he pleased as far as I am concerned as a free agent. I am yet to hear what better options he rejected, but nor should he have taken other than his best option imo. Your ‘literal fact’ is hardly compelling, more a literary fact actually, something you read somewhere and very short on details.
In actual reality Durant was drafted by the Seattle SuperSonics, and perhaps oddly played his rookie year in the city of Seattle, after which the franchise was hi-jacked to OKC. He gave the franchise I believe 8 further years, re-upping once, and was counted as being outclassed by LeBron and the Heatles despite despite facing a superteam with a team of fellow 22 and 23 year olds, with subsequent discussions mainly based on what he and his team-mates became at their peaks rather than what they were then. After brilliant drafting OKC didn’t keep Harden, and made no attempt to improve the coaching, game plan or roster (in particular the spacing) despite improvements obviously being necessary. He also gave OKC 4 more years after a finals loss in which they didn’t win a title, had a career threatening injury the management of which gave every appearance to me of being flawed, but was supposed to stay again because of a WCF loss this time. ?.
Most of all as I said elsewhere he was a Free Agent entitled to go wherever he chose after 9 years. You are perhaps unfamiliar with the meaning of the word free ?. He was a top 5 player who joined another top 5 player as has been commonplace over the last 15 years or so, but a well constructed team had been built around the top 5 player he joined which is actually not illegal or unfair.
Read somewhere and am short on details? LeBron tried luring Bosh to Cleveland. Bosh himself confirmed this. What more information do you need? Do you need to know that LeBron had to go to his own mom for advice on the matter because he was so conflicted? Or the fact that he was the last one of the three to make a decision and only did so after Cleveland failed to bring any of the big name FAs to the team? Are you really that incapable of reading between the lines?
And you seem to be misunderstanding the point. No one’s saying Durant should have stayed. No one’s misunderstanding the term “free”. The problem is that you are outright choosing to ignore context and are just stopping at “they both left to join another top five player”. That would be fine if there wasn’t more nuance to it. Again, one did in fact leave to join a top five player, that being LeBron. Durant on the other hand did the same… except that top five player was also a back to back MVP, the latter being the first ever unanimous MVP selection in NBA history on the backbone of a historically dominant season. On that aspect alone, you’re already wrong, but it gets worse. That team also had two other all NBA players from the previous season and they made the finals and were one win away from winning it all. And that isn’t even mentioning the 73 wins. Oh and btw, they were the ones who beat Durant. Durant made his choice. It was a cowardly move, but it got him two championships, so it worked. You want to say it’s the same as what LeBron did, there’s where you end up being wrong in this situation.
At this point it’s coming down to choosing to ignore key factors and having a fixation on one detail and going “see? They’re the same!”. They are not, and blind fanboyism is the only thing I can boil this down to. And yes, oh I’m well aware you’re a curry fan, not a Durant fan. No one said anything about you being a Durant fan though, so I’m not sure what you’re going on about.
So it can only be blind fanboyism that explains my defence of Durant on this troll thread which exists only to denigrate him even though I am actually primarily a Curry fan ?. My main motivation is actually that I don’t like lynch mobs on sports forums.
And now we have proceeded from ‘literal fact’ to reading between the lines ?. And because LeBron may have vaguely asked his friend Chris Bosh whether he was interested in joining the Cavs and Chris Bosh may later have said they had a conversation, for whatever motive which could conceivably have included justifying the formation of the Heatles after the trenchant criticism they copped, LeBron was henceforth entitled to any choice he cared to make while other elite players could only make moves approved by LeBron fans ?. I am sure LeBron would have liked to have chosen that Wade, Bosh, Eric Spoelstra and Pat Riley join him in Cleveland, and similarly KD might have been happier to stay at OKC if Curry, Thompson, Green and Kerr could have joined him there, but neither was ever going to happen.
Both of them had given 8 or 9 years to the franchise which signed them, and were free to go wherever they wanted to go for whatever reason, including not wanting to live in OKC any more if that was KD’s preference. The FA rule came into being so that young men drafted to play in places not of their choosing did not have to stay there for their entire career, which in some cases amounts to 20 years or more.
I have no problem with non-partisan followers of the NBA having a preference, perhaps for reasons of aesthetics or philosophy, that LeBron, Curry and Durant be at 3 different franchises. It doesn’t require much in the way of reading between the lines to work out why LeBron fans were peeved about KD joining GSW however.
And it is the problem of LeBron and his partisans if LeBron is not as good as Curry at turning his non top 5 team-mates into all stars and doesn’t understand team construction; as I have said before all indications are that while a great player he is a terrible GM. Were the 2014 Spurs also unfair for playing a team game with a well constructed roster and actually developing Kawhi Leonard into a top 5 player which he wasn’t before the 2014 play-offs and probably wasn't really until the finals that year ?.