DimesandKnicks wrote:AleksandarN wrote:DimesandKnicks wrote:
Why conveniently leave out the fact that during that playoff run he also had KCP, AG, Bruce Brown and Jeff Green?
And during that run Jokic actually “tried” and held players to like 59 percent at the rim and committed three and a half fouls per game. Did he do a good job defending without fouling than or does the small sample size suggesting he’s a good defender only applicable when observing what he’s good at. Is he bad at defending without fouling because he had one playoff run when he defended with more effort and earned a bunch of fouls? The bias and lack of objectivity is just weird.
Defense is a team game. If your coach has a good scheme and the players buy in, you don’t need great individual defenders to have a good defense and the Nuggest have a great defensive scheme that makes up for Jokicc’s flaws.
I’m not saying Jokic isn’t capable of defending…I’m saying he simply doesn’t and it’s evident when you watch him watch defenders make layups on him with out even putting his hands up.
Great hands? You play defender with your body not your hands.
If he were Lebron you all would be crucifying him but for whatever reason Jokic gets a pass for not being a good defender
Playing team defense takes skill and IQ. Jokic has the highest basketball iq in the game. He knows sets teams run. He coordinates his teammates on the defensive end. That is not a player that is “terrible” on defense. No one is calling him the best defender in the league. He is not elite. But in the same vein he is not “terrible” either
Enjoy your low standards bro
What low standards? He is not a terrible or negative defender as he brings way more to table than rim protection. Funny that you ignore the rest. In high leverage situations Denver’s defense is in the top part of the league and that’s with AG(their best defender) missing half of the season with injuries.
