ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging...

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,884
And1: 109,533
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#461 » by Capn'O » Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:01 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

The cold hard truth Folkssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Right and we lost iHart for nothing and Mitch hasn't played.

This is why we need to look at the team with Mitch very closely when he comes back. Not that he's some panacea that fixes everything (so nobody respond with that kind of dumb **** post) but he's a different _type_ of player that can cover for some of KAT/JB's deficiencies. A proper rim protector. We can evaluate if that type of player or maybe Mitch himself helps us compete or if we're still substantially deficient. Likewise, it gives us a proper look at Thibs with these offensive weapons and a drop coverage big.

We also should have given Huk some run to that effect. The C's were abusing us on the glass.


So we all agree that Kat at the 5 is untenable???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don’t think we can win a championship with Kat without an elite defesnive center next to him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As you said Mitch’s incoming return looms large not just for the now but also this rosters long term future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


There are certainly going to be some matchups where it's untenable. I don't quite know what Huk is yet - still needs some seasoning - but I've been encouraged at his ability to guard in space as well as rim protect.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 15,323
And1: 7,869
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#462 » by sol537 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:17 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Thibs seat is getting hot folkssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Need to start racking up more losses in embarrassing fashion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


As I've been saying from day one... KAT and Brunson is not an ideal pairing (due to defense) and Thibs is not a championship coach. I love all those guys but not if we want a title.

1) Replace Thibs with Johnnie Bryant or Dan Hurley (ie a modern coach)
2) Commit to Brunson, so KAT has to be traded (maybe for a guy like Giannis or, alternatively, for multiple pieces)
3) Bring in a 3&D wing who can play make some so JB/Hart aren't your only playmakers.

We can take the next step... just need to make the right moves this off-season. I believe in Leon.
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,112
And1: 6,246
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#463 » by whocares1 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:30 pm

We could do this tho:

-If Brunson and Towns are playing together there should be a rim protector on the court.

-Play KAT at the 5 when Brunson sits. Playing KAT at the 5 should still be apart of the game just not the whole game.


-When KAT sits, run a one big lineup(ideally Mitch) with 4 floor spacers. This maximizes the spacing for Brunson and prevents the opposing teams from not guarding two players like Hart and Mitch. Ideally a lineup of Brunson Deuce Mikal OG and Mitch.
HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,055
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#464 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:33 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
HEZI wrote:
Read on Twitter


Just switch :lol:

Weak in the ass Mikal gets sealed off by KP without any problems waiting for the lob. KAT now has to decide does he go help or does he stay up so he’s in no man’s land. Tatum attacks off the screen and gets KAT back pedaling and KAT provides zero resistance at the rim for an easy layup and that is with OG trying his best to still help and contest.

Layups and dunks. No matter the scheme, KAT is still targeted



and I showed you where the switching works from the last game with clips...and crickets from you because it doesn't fit your narrative. No defensive system is going to work everytime especially with KAT's lack of defensively ability along with Brunson. But that just doesn't mean continue to run drop...especially vs the celtics..people have shown the numbers so I don't have to restate them.

Also the Celtics shot way worse from 3 yesterday and we switched way more in that game than the previous two. So I'm not sure what the last clip shows,

We were actually way worse in Precious minutes than KAT's and he's a way better defender. We still gave up pts with KAT off the floor.

And we don't talk about our offense...why are we putting up 19 pts in the 1st qtr? Again we go into a game a team is just going to switch all our screens and then we are way too slow to have a counter for that.


So we are back here again

Image

You found no solution, just another way for us to get exposed. You just want it to look different :lol:

The offensive issue was already addressed
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,276
And1: 115,983
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#465 » by mpharris36 » Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:42 pm

HEZI wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
HEZI wrote:
Read on Twitter


Just switch :lol:

Weak in the ass Mikal gets sealed off by KP without any problems waiting for the lob. KAT now has to decide does he go help or does he stay up so he’s in no man’s land. Tatum attacks off the screen and gets KAT back pedaling and KAT provides zero resistance at the rim for an easy layup and that is with OG trying his best to still help and contest.

Layups and dunks. No matter the scheme, KAT is still targeted



and I showed you where the switching works from the last game with clips...and crickets from you because it doesn't fit your narrative. No defensive system is going to work everytime especially with KAT's lack of defensively ability along with Brunson. But that just doesn't mean continue to run drop...especially vs the celtics..people have shown the numbers so I don't have to restate them.

Also the Celtics shot way worse from 3 yesterday and we switched way more in that game than the previous two. So I'm not sure what the last clip shows,

We were actually way worse in Precious minutes than KAT's and he's a way better defender. We still gave up pts with KAT off the floor.

And we don't talk about our offense...why are we putting up 19 pts in the 1st qtr? Again we go into a game a team is just going to switch all our screens and then we are way too slow to have a counter for that.


So we are back here again

Image

You found no solution, just another way for us to get exposed. You just want it to look different :lol:

The offensive issue was already addressed



love it...come with facts...get a non relevant picture as a response...

good day sir...
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,292
And1: 42,664
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#466 » by TheGreenArrow » Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:58 pm

sol537 wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Thibs seat is getting hot folkssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Need to start racking up more losses in embarrassing fashion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


As I've been saying from day one... KAT and Brunson is not an ideal pairing (due to defense) and Thibs is not a championship coach. I love all those guys but not if we want a title.

1) Replace Thibs with Johnnie Bryant or Dan Hurley (ie a modern coach)
2) Commit to Brunson, so KAT has to be traded (maybe for a guy like Giannis or, alternatively, for multiple pieces)
3) Bring in a 3&D wing who can play make some so JB/Hart aren't your only playmakers.

We can take the next step... just need to make the right moves this off-season. I believe in Leon.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Thibs will be the 1st to go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The vultures are circling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,292
And1: 42,664
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#467 » by TheGreenArrow » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:03 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
god shammgod wrote::rofl2:

lol the straw man arguments are hilarious. And it’s always from the crowd that’s always on the wrong side of history. Hate to see it.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

You may have been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HEZI
RealGM
Posts: 43,055
And1: 29,248
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#468 » by HEZI » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:11 pm

mpharris36 wrote:
HEZI wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

and I showed you where the switching works from the last game with clips...and crickets from you because it doesn't fit your narrative. No defensive system is going to work everytime especially with KAT's lack of defensively ability along with Brunson. But that just doesn't mean continue to run drop...especially vs the celtics..people have shown the numbers so I don't have to restate them.

Also the Celtics shot way worse from 3 yesterday and we switched way more in that game than the previous two. So I'm not sure what the last clip shows,

We were actually way worse in Precious minutes than KAT's and he's a way better defender. We still gave up pts with KAT off the floor.

And we don't talk about our offense...why are we putting up 19 pts in the 1st qtr? Again we go into a game a team is just going to switch all our screens and then we are way too slow to have a counter for that.


So we are back here again

Image

You found no solution, just another way for us to get exposed. You just want it to look different :lol:

The offensive issue was already addressed



love it...come with facts...get a non relevant picture as a response...

good day sir...


You choose to ignore facts, that’s on you.

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


KAT giving up layups and dunks on switches is not a solution no matter how much you try to claim it is
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ayo Dosunmu/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Harrison Barnes/Isaac Okoro
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,924
And1: 136,016
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#469 » by 3toheadmelo » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:24 pm

HEZI wrote:
Read on Twitter


Just switch :lol:

Weak in the ass Mikal gets sealed off by KP without any problems waiting for the lob. KAT now has to decide does he go help or does he stay up so he’s in no man’s land. Tatum attacks off the screen and gets KAT back pedaling and KAT provides zero resistance at the rim for an easy layup and that is with OG trying his best to still help and contest.

Layups and dunks. No matter the scheme, KAT is still targeted

Anyone who knows ball knows that there is no scheme for a god awful defensive 5.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,924
And1: 136,016
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#470 » by 3toheadmelo » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:25 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
god shammgod wrote::rofl2:

lol the straw man arguments are hilarious. And it’s always from the crowd that’s always on the wrong side of history. Hate to see it.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

You may have been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may not be always right!!!! But I’m never wrong!!!!
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,756
And1: 4,563
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#471 » by Wildcat » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:32 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Wildcat wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Literally Bargnani bad. Just sad. Mind blowing that people won’t acknowledge how garbage he’s been on defense. But let’s blame OG and Thibs instead. :lol:



Thibs has a role in all this for his stubbornness to keep KAT at the 5, so yeah, we got to blame Thibs, too. As much as I love Hart, OG isn't a 4, and Hart should be off the bench. When this trade went down and it was announced Mitch was going to be out longer than reported, my concern with OG being the 4 was immediate. Precious getting hate so early on threw out any sort of lineup variation. Considering how weak Deuce has been as the 6th man, it just makes all the sense in the world to me to have Hart be that spark plug we need, and go a different route with the starting lineup. Personally, I wanted a Precious/KAT/OG/Bridges/JB lineup.

I hear you, but I’m not really sure what Thibs can do. The Knicks fked up going all in on Mikal cause we’re very limited in our assets to get a rim protector next to KAT. That’s on the front office.


It's hard to defend the Bridges trade because of the picks, but if you put a gun to my head and say if I thought he could turn it around, I'd say yes. JB extending doesn't happen without Bridges. The lack of offensive creativity by Thibs end doesn't make Bridges consistency look any better. This is why I keep saying I feel like Thibs took a coaching step back this season, because last season I was going to bat for him day in and day out. This season, I just don't see it. Makes me truly wonder how much of a good influence Johnnie had on him.

Hell, seeing him put KAT back in pissed me the hell off.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,884
And1: 109,533
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#472 » by Capn'O » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:37 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
god shammgod wrote::rofl2:

lol the straw man arguments are hilarious. And it’s always from the crowd that’s always on the wrong side of history. Hate to see it.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

You may have been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


A lot of people talked about the defense and the poor fit with Thibs but didn't throw a huge fit in every thread for the whole year or just leave because of it. We're not contenders yet but we have one of the better Knicks teams since the 90s without even having a rim protector/drop big that Thibs needs to make a defense hum. We're also a big step up from where the team was over the summer after losing our second most impactful player last year for nothing.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 38,031
And1: 64,446
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#473 » by Guano » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:38 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Guano wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
We'll definitely need to rely on internal development. Guys like Huk and Dadiet will need to pan.

I would have it as ECF or bust with Thibs.


We need the update on those astroid odds, homie.


https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/24/chance-giant-asteroid-hitting-earth-2032-falls

Data from Nasa reveals it is now 0.0017%.


That de-escalated quickly.


We really can't have sht :angry:
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,452
And1: 53,140
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#474 » by MrDollarBills » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:49 pm

Guano wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Guano wrote:
We need the update on those astroid odds, homie.


https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/feb/24/chance-giant-asteroid-hitting-earth-2032-falls

Data from Nasa reveals it is now 0.0017%.


That de-escalated quickly.


We really can't have sht :angry:


It was only a city killer so unless we were in the line of fire, we'd still have to go to work the next day
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 76,452
And1: 53,140
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#475 » by MrDollarBills » Mon Feb 24, 2025 11:52 pm

I'm out on Tom.

However, I do agree with everyone who is saying KAT needs to have a rim defender next to him. There were things happening defensively that I thought was just piss poor from Karl yesterday regardless of drop coverage.

This offseason the team needs to add an additional ball handler and interior defender. I would also probably shop Mikal to see if there's a way to add more pieces. I just don't see the fit anymore sadly.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: C. Williams/J. Howard
SG: G. Allen/
PG: B. Simmons/C. Payne
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 38,031
And1: 64,446
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#476 » by Guano » Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:03 am

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g



Posting a Celtics fan talkin sht about Brunson!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Be better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,292
And1: 42,664
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#477 » by TheGreenArrow » Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:14 am

Capn'O wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:lol the straw man arguments are hilarious. And it’s always from the crowd that’s always on the wrong side of history. Hate to see it.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

You may have been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


A lot of people talked about the defense and the poor fit with Thibs but didn't throw a huge fit in every thread for the whole year or just leave because of it. We're not contenders yet but we have one of the better Knicks teams since the 90s without even having a rim protector/drop big that Thibs needs to make a defense hum. We're also a big step up from where the team was over the summer after losing our second most impactful player last year for nothing.


I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’d still do the towns trade 10times out of 10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The fact remains even though we are a much more talented team doesn’t mean that we are actually better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We have elite talent but that means nothing if there is no grit/toughness or heart!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And if we are being honest this team severely lacks that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is a finesse team and we need a coach to match it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And thibs ain’t it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,292
And1: 42,664
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#478 » by TheGreenArrow » Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:16 am

Guano wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g



Posting a Celtics fan talkin sht about Brunson!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Be better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey man like i always say……!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even if I am a minority of one, the truth is the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 137,878
And1: 136,182
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#479 » by god shammgod » Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:17 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:lol the straw man arguments are hilarious. And it’s always from the crowd that’s always on the wrong side of history. Hate to see it.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

You may have been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may not be always right!!!! But I’m never wrong!!!!




listen to bontempts in the begging of this podcast. everyone has woken up. except the guys on here who told us we were dumb for thinking phil jackson sucked as gm and frank wasn't any good. sad.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,292
And1: 42,664
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG: Knicks vs. Celtics: At least that 3rd quarter was encouraging... 

Post#480 » by TheGreenArrow » Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:23 am

god shammgod wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

You may have been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may not be always right!!!! But I’m never wrong!!!!




listen to bontempts in the begging of this podcast. everyone has woken up. except the guys on here who told us we were dumb for thinking phil jackson sucked as gm and frank wasn't any good. sad.


Are you willing to give this team another shot with added depth and a new HC????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or is it is what it is and we can’t win a championship with Brunson&Kat Duo??????????????????????????????

Return to New York Knicks