TheGreenArrow wrote:Capn'O wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
The cold hard truth Folkssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right and we lost iHart for nothing and Mitch hasn't played.
This is why we need to look at the team with Mitch very closely when he comes back. Not that he's some panacea that fixes everything (so nobody respond with that kind of dumb **** post) but he's a different _type_ of player that can cover for some of KAT/JB's deficiencies. A proper rim protector. We can evaluate if that type of player or maybe Mitch himself helps us compete or if we're still substantially deficient. Likewise, it gives us a proper look at Thibs with these offensive weapons and a drop coverage big.
We also should have given Huk some run to that effect. The C's were abusing us on the glass.
So we all agree that Kat at the 5 is untenable???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don’t think we can win a championship with Kat without an elite defesnive center next to him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As you said Mitch’s incoming return looms large not just for the now but also this rosters long term future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There are certainly going to be some matchups where it's untenable. I don't quite know what Huk is yet - still needs some seasoning - but I've been encouraged at his ability to guard in space as well as rim protect.