PG: that sucked
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: PG: that sucked
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,827
- And1: 137,434
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG: that sucked
Shout out to KG. great person!

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG: that sucked
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin

- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,336
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: PG: that sucked
If MB was good enough, JB would probably naturally cede more "control" to him.
But JB could probably help him get going. MB shouldn't be shooting 3's. He could have dribbled in for a pull up. Only corner 3's for him and he missed one of those too. Take a 2, he's really good at that difficult shot.
Whatever. The MB stuff makes sense, he's just failing and JB won't defer to him. The KAT stuff makes much less sense.
But JB could probably help him get going. MB shouldn't be shooting 3's. He could have dribbled in for a pull up. Only corner 3's for him and he missed one of those too. Take a 2, he's really good at that difficult shot.
Whatever. The MB stuff makes sense, he's just failing and JB won't defer to him. The KAT stuff makes much less sense.
Re: PG: that sucked
-
LFGK
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,843
- And1: 1,486
- Joined: Apr 24, 2024
-
Re: PG: that sucked
Guano wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:Guano wrote:Jfc, we're doing Randle stanning after THAT playoff loss.
Like sitting in a hospital bed and reminiscing your parents forgetting your birthday type vibes. Bunch of sickos in here.
we're not. that pivot attempts has been shut down. thankfully.
Woke up in a terrible mood cause of the loss. Wanted to avoid all things knicks until the next game to avoid my negative feelings after that loss. Couldn't compartmentalize the pain - getting soft the older I get. Decided to share in the misery with you all so I drop by only to see Randle debates. And now I feel worse.![]()
Sham is right this place is terrible.
the worst, you would think we're down 3-0
Re: PG: that sucked
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,314
- And1: 56,804
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: PG: that sucked
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:![]()
Maybe we need a new coach and a second option. Both can be true.
Nah, only one of those things is true.
I actually didn't snitch this time, but I want you thinking I did even if I didn't. You see I'm willing to kamikaze myself to get you too, I'm in playoff mode, you looking like the Knicks coached by Thibs
I know you didn’t. When that weird najeem guy starts crashing out the mods are on his ass immediately lmao
I don't know, Najeem makes a lot of great points and I support his movement

Re: PG: that sucked
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,827
- And1: 137,434
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG: that sucked
Ima need someone to cook up an animorpheus of Mikal turning into afflalo

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG: that sucked
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,827
- And1: 137,434
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG: that sucked
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Nah, only one of those things is true.
I actually didn't snitch this time, but I want you thinking I did even if I didn't. You see I'm willing to kamikaze myself to get you too, I'm in playoff mode, you looking like the Knicks coached by Thibs
I know you didn’t. When that weird najeem guy starts crashing out the mods are on his ass immediately lmao
I don't know, Najeem makes a lot of great points and I support his movement
Better watch what you saying before they put you in a jail cell next to his

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG: that sucked
- Guano
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,218
- And1: 66,422
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
- Location: any port
Re: PG: that sucked
KnicksGod wrote:Guano wrote:Jfc, we're doing Randle stanning after THAT playoff loss.
Like sitting in a hospital bed and reminiscing your parents forgetting your birthday type vibes. Bunch of sickos in here.
I didn't do any stanning lol. You'd have to read my posts.
KAT is obviously a better player. But he's like a square peg in a round hole and maybe the real issue is he's not able to defend whereas you can hide Randle's defense some
I don't know ... I'm doing a rare thing by admitting I don't know.
But KAT is probably the most talented guy with this little impact in NBA history. Dude can make any shot and is a great passer. He also works his butt off.
And yet he's a non-factor against a team that is not great.
I'm not taking this bait and comparing Randle and kat. It's crazy
I will say that kats defense has NOT been in issue in these 2 games. He has been surprisingly good in both games. The issue is we don't set him up to utilize his talents on offense. That's a major issue so far in this series.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Re: PG: that sucked
- mpharris36
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 113,029
- And1: 117,267
- Joined: Nov 03, 2010
-
Re: PG: that sucked
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxbSRPsoxeb5Ma6itFrktxWk_2HBV4wffo?si=eLcARi5f0UFzR_DX
watch this damn clip...we ran this set once...ONCE and it got Brunson an open 3...using Hart as an off ball down screener to get on of our scorer open...the fact we haven't spammed this play or other plays is crazy so me.
SPAM
SPAM
SPAM
SPAM
SPAM
brunson eFG% in catch and shoot sky rockets...if they over play or help off then you will have hart open down low....you can also run this for KAT/Mikal/OG anyone that you want to get open for a shot but especially brunson because what they will have to do is either switch or help off which gives Brunson driving lanes as well off the catch if they overplay.
SPAM IT!!! U DUMMY!
watch this damn clip...we ran this set once...ONCE and it got Brunson an open 3...using Hart as an off ball down screener to get on of our scorer open...the fact we haven't spammed this play or other plays is crazy so me.
SPAM
SPAM
SPAM
SPAM
SPAM
brunson eFG% in catch and shoot sky rockets...if they over play or help off then you will have hart open down low....you can also run this for KAT/Mikal/OG anyone that you want to get open for a shot but especially brunson because what they will have to do is either switch or help off which gives Brunson driving lanes as well off the catch if they overplay.
SPAM IT!!! U DUMMY!
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:
ROSTER
Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
ROSTER
Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
Re: PG: that sucked
-
HEZI
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,381
- And1: 29,547
- Joined: Nov 16, 2004
-
Re: PG: that sucked
mpharris36 wrote:Guano wrote:Sad state of affairs. They've been the better team for 2 games and were fortunate to be tied right now.
it makes no sense...there second best player is what Tobias Harris? Dennis Schroder?
We built this team to not be solely reliant Brunson so that we could be more dynamic....so its not just Cade vs Brunson its our team vs Cade.
But Brunson is playing more minutes, taking more shots, and has a higher usage on a team with KAT, OG, and Mikal on it...like we have way more offensive fire power...but we are even playing more Brunson hero ball. It makes literally no sense...or it actually does make sense because well you know why...
We really don’t when you look at how much we lost. Randle, RJ, Donte, IHart, Grimes, IQ is a ton of offense lost. We basically took two steps back to move one step forward and at best we moved two steps forward and are just back to where we were but I think the depth we lost has set us back some.
DENVER NUGGETS
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ochai Agbaji/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Josh Okogie/Julian Strawther
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
Jamal Murray/Ty Jerome/Dante Exum
Zach Lavine/Ochai Agbaji/Corey Kispert
Aaron Gordon/Josh Okogie/Julian Strawther
Jakob Poeltl/Moussa Diabate/Karlo Matkovic
Ivica Zubac/Nick Richards/Oscar Tshiebwe
Re: PG: that sucked
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin

- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,336
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: PG: that sucked
The other reality check is had MB made one or two of those three misses, we'd be sitting here saying JB deferred to him and we won. And MB is finally living up to his expectations, etc.
Still, we played G1 and G2 very poorly no matter the win or loss. I sounded the alarm after G1, because I didn't think JB "won" that game.
Still, we played G1 and G2 very poorly no matter the win or loss. I sounded the alarm after G1, because I didn't think JB "won" that game.
Re: PG: that sucked
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,314
- And1: 56,804
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: PG: that sucked
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:I know you didn’t. When that weird najeem guy starts crashing out the mods are on his ass immediately lmao
I don't know, Najeem makes a lot of great points and I support his movement
Better watch what you saying before they put you in a jail cell next to his
I am fine with taking a life sentence as long as you're in the cell next to me. I'm not afraid of the bing, as long as you suffer with me. This is what true grit looks like Melo, you been going against weak defenders for years, I am driven purely by disdain, contempt and wanting to see someone else suffer with me. I will burn the bridge just so we both can't cross it. I am the king crab in the bucket.

Re: PG: that sucked
- mpharris36
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 113,029
- And1: 117,267
- Joined: Nov 03, 2010
-
Re: PG: that sucked
HEZI wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Guano wrote:Sad state of affairs. They've been the better team for 2 games and were fortunate to be tied right now.
it makes no sense...there second best player is what Tobias Harris? Dennis Schroder?
We built this team to not be solely reliant Brunson so that we could be more dynamic....so its not just Cade vs Brunson its our team vs Cade.
But Brunson is playing more minutes, taking more shots, and has a higher usage on a team with KAT, OG, and Mikal on it...like we have way more offensive fire power...but we are even playing more Brunson hero ball. It makes literally no sense...or it actually does make sense because well you know why...
We really don’t when you look at how much we lost. Randle, RJ, Donte, IHart, Grimes, IQ is a ton of offense lost. We basically took two steps back to move one step forward and at best we moved two steps forward and are just back to where we were but I think the depth we lost has set us back some.
well when you don't allow our 7 foot nearly 30 pt per game efficient talent to even take a shot in the entire 4th qtr yes...the offense will look the same because we are running the exact same offense we did the last two years with completely different talent.
We we replaced less efficient players with highly efficient players...
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:
ROSTER
Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
ROSTER
Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
Re: PG: that sucked
- Guano
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,218
- And1: 66,422
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
- Location: any port
Re: PG: that sucked
mpharris36 wrote:Guano wrote:Sad state of affairs. They've been the better team for 2 games and were fortunate to be tied right now.
it makes no sense...there second best player is what Tobias Harris? Dennis Schroder?
We built this team to not be solely reliant Brunson so that we could be more dynamic....so its not just Cade vs Brunson its our team vs Cade.
But Brunson is playing more minutes, taking more shots, and has a higher usage on a team with KAT, OG, and Mikal on it...like we have way more offensive fire power...but we are even playing more Brunson hero ball. It makes literally no sense...or it actually does make sense because well you know why...
I just can't help think how fortunate we are to be tied right now.... that they have looked like the better team for 2 games @ msg. Which is fcking ridiculous with the talent we have on our team. Just sucks.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Re: PG: that sucked
- Guano
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,218
- And1: 66,422
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
- Location: any port
Re: PG: that sucked
Capn'O wrote:Just use the other thread, folks.
Time to lace em up for one last run, cap
This is your mj wizards run.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Re: PG: that sucked
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin

- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,336
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: PG: that sucked
It's hilarious that for all the guys dribbling on the perimeter and deciding what to do -- which is our whole offense -- I'd be much more comfortable with KAT doing that than anybody else. So even within the structure of Thibs' completely predictable offense, we are avoiding the one guy who can probably bail us out.
That's so Knicks.
That's so Knicks.
Re: PG: that sucked
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 90,652
- And1: 110,795
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Bone Goal
-
Re: PG: that sucked
Guano wrote:Capn'O wrote:Just use the other thread, folks.
Time to lace em up for one last run, cap
This is your mj wizards run.
I can still hand out temp bans
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN
Re: PG: that sucked
- K_ick_God
- Site Admin

- Posts: 80,879
- And1: 43,336
- Joined: Oct 10, 2003
-
Re: PG: that sucked
It's also so Knicks that the Cavs have Jerome, the Pacers have Nembhard and we are stuck with Bridges.
Re: PG: that sucked
- Guano
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,218
- And1: 66,422
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
- Location: any port
Re: PG: that sucked
3toheadmelo wrote:Shout out to KG. great person!
Using a senile ol' man.
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
some of the worst people
He is talkin' about YOU
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Re: PG: that sucked
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,827
- And1: 137,434
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG: that sucked
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
I don't know, Najeem makes a lot of great points and I support his movement
Better watch what you saying before they put you in a jail cell next to his
I am fine with taking a life sentence as long as you're in the cell next to me. I'm not afraid of the bing, as long as you suffer with me. This is what true grit looks like Melo, you been going against weak defenders for years, I am driven purely by disdain, contempt and wanting to see someone else suffer with me. I will burn the bridge just so we both can't cross it. I am the king crab in the bucket.

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG: that sucked
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,314
- And1: 56,804
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: PG: that sucked
KnicksGod wrote:It's also so Knicks that the Cavs have Jerome, the Pacers have Nembhard and we are stuck with Bridges.
They also have good coaches.
The Pacers have a winning record against .500 or better teams the last two seasons, we have never had a winning record vs .500 or better with Thibs. The Cavs were 6 games under vs .500 teams last season, this season they were 28-11 against those teams.










