Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Butch718 wrote:I was highly skeptical of the impact that Mitch would have. Glad I was wrong about that too.
Mazz actually intentionally fouled him twice to get him out of the game.
El Poochio wrote:
RIP mags
Jalen Bluntson wrote:El Poochio wrote:
You're a little early with the broom brother. That's 4 wins in a row.
HEZI wrote:spree8 wrote:HEZI wrote:
The switching hasn’t been something that has worked. Celtics still keep getting wide open looks and they have built up 20+ leads in back to back games. It’s the emphasis on protecting the paint, living with their 3 point chucking and then just extra effort from individual players when it comes to moving their feet, deflecting passes, digging and stripping the ball, contesting shots on their drives, etc. which has helped us in the comebacks
Of course it has… I thought everyone knew that. If the focus was only protecting the paint, well, we did that all season and got destroyed by 30
Not at all. We are actually doing a better job protecting the paint not the 3 point line. They still get a ton of open looks, which fortunately for us they have been missing. But we have shut down drives on the two guys who can actually get inside and have punished us inside in the past and that’s Tatum and Brown.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Zenzibar wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Let’s assume we go 1-1 at home. Then it’s 3-1 going back to Boston.
vallen wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:god shammgod wrote:i'm starting to think crazy lol
My intrusive thoughts are flying too close to the sun right now
"Who do we matchup with better from the West?"
Guano wrote:vallen wrote:
He isn't doing that sht.
20miles is beefy even without elly. And shoeless - nah. He would wreck himself.
TKKnicks1 wrote:I'm still not counting out the Celtics. They had a lot of wide open looks that just didn't fall the past 2 games. If they start hitting those threes we are in for a rude of awakening.
OG and Mikal are playing some of the best defense I've seen 1 on 1 but our overall team defense still has a lot to be desired. It's an amazing feeling to be up 2-0 against the defending champs but I think we still got ourselves a series here.
TKKnicks1 wrote:I'm still not counting out the Celtics. They had a lot of wide open looks that just didn't fall the past 2 games. If they start hitting those threes we are in for a rude of awakening.
OG and Mikal are playing some of the best defense I've seen 1 on 1 but our overall team defense still has a lot to be desired. It's an amazing feeling to be up 2-0 against the defending champs but I think we still got ourselves a series here.
TKKnicks at this point you need to be saying F the Celtics. Your Knicks deserve your energy discussing WHY you think we will win the series Butch718 wrote:I was highly skeptical of the impact that Mitch would have. Glad I was wrong about that too.
Mazz actually intentionally fouled him twice to get him out of the game.
Guano wrote:vallen wrote:
He isn't doing that sht.
20miles is beefy even without elly. And shoeless - nah. He would wreck himself.
