I agree with Dat (usually the smart choice). Draymond Green is a one-of-generation kind of player. The only thing I can add is possibly encouraging.Dat2U wrote:nate33 wrote:A little food for thought:
Collin Murray-Boyles compares favorably to Draymond Green in every physical aspect except for a slightly slower lane agility. He is springier despite carrying more weight, and they have comparable wingspans.
Normally I consider it blasphemy to compare anyone to Draymond Green because nobody has ever been like Draymond Green defensively with his insane anticipation, but CMB is posting defensive numbers in college that at least make the comparison plausible.
To me, the Draymond Green comparison is a death knell. Draymond is one of one in terms of defensive versatility, motor, IQ, intensity, ball-skills for a small ball center. CMB has some similar traits but so have many others and it hasnt come close to working. It seems CMB has a cult following among stat geeks but watching the film, I saw hardly anything that translates offensively to an NBA floor. Also CMB's ball skills & passing are functional not special or elite. He's a face-up, straight line driver with a basic cross over, solid frame & good touch. Time and time again, I saw CMB take advantage of terrible defenses. I saw him in one game, receive (3) post entry passes (lobs) from the top of the key that he caught over a sealed off smaller defener for easy layups. When is that happening in the NBA? Draymond's jumper was also much further along in college. No one is guarding CMB outside of the paint.
I see an energy guy. Small ball C who will be matchup based and played off the floor against bigger front lines.
Somewhere between Jared Vanderbilt (who could also handle the rock abit coming out) and Montrezl Harrell is what I see him becoming.
Draymond Green was a round 2, 35th selection.
We've mentioned Queen, Sorber,and Wolf a bunch, but I don't see why Alex Condon or Grant Peterson couldn't be highly effective.



















