Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
LFGK wrote:RookieStar wrote:Im accepting bribes to watch ( nyk fans ) or not watch ( ind fans) game 4.
Seems i have some magical juju that affects the outcome. Lol
Seriously, each game had 1 player that clearly went supernova for their team. Wonder which one will supersaiyan in game 4.
OG is do for a 27 point game
RookieStar wrote:LFGK wrote:RookieStar wrote:Im accepting bribes to watch ( nyk fans ) or not watch ( ind fans) game 4.
Seems i have some magical juju that affects the outcome. Lol
Seriously, each game had 1 player that clearly went supernova for their team. Wonder which one will supersaiyan in game 4.
OG is do for a 27 point game
Naaaaah. He is my vote for the next player to get injured on an important series like Garland, Tatum, AG. OG is next i think...
RookieStar wrote:LFGK wrote:RookieStar wrote:Im accepting bribes to watch ( nyk fans ) or not watch ( ind fans) game 4.
Seems i have some magical juju that affects the outcome. Lol
Seriously, each game had 1 player that clearly went supernova for their team. Wonder which one will supersaiyan in game 4.
OG is do for a 27 point game
Naaaaah. He is my vote for the next player to get injured on an important series like Garland, Tatum, AG. OG is next i think...
Fat wrote:RookieStar wrote:LFGK wrote:
OG is do for a 27 point game
Naaaaah. He is my vote for the next player to get injured on an important series like Garland, Tatum, AG. OG is next i think...
Injury predictions is nasty work
Fat wrote:RookieStar wrote:LFGK wrote:
OG is do for a 27 point game
Naaaaah. He is my vote for the next player to get injured on an important series like Garland, Tatum, AG. OG is next i think...
Injury predictions is nasty work
Capn'O wrote:RookieStar wrote:LFGK wrote:
OG is do for a 27 point game
Naaaaah. He is my vote for the next player to get injured on an important series like Garland, Tatum, AG. OG is next i think...
What's wrong with you?
xBulletproof wrote:cgf wrote:xBulletproof wrote:Pacers just can't have periods where they play iso ball. That's what the Knicks got the Celtics to do.
The Nesmith injury changed the vibe, and the rotation to start the 4th. That didn't help either. Oh well, we saw all their changes, and will adjust. Same thing happened in the Cavs series. Cavs changes won them game 3, and the Pacers came equipped to attack it in game 4.
I wouldn't be so quick to assume you saw all of Thibs changes. This season has been very much one of showing as much as we are forced to, of what this team's full potential is. You've forced Thibs to use the double bigs more, replace Payne with Wright, and bring Shamet into the rotation, but there are other adjustments he can make to counter some of the adjustments Carlisle still has available to him.
This should continue to be a fascinating series since we're not soft & injured like the cavs were by game 4. Both teams are really well coached, have fantastic closers, and zero quit. You'll come back with a haymaker in the next round, but we might just slip it and catch you again.
I don't assume that's all of them, but you're not gonna stray too far from your strategy from the last game. You're gonna make a team beat that strategy before you move on to the next. Otherwise you risk outsmarting yourself.
So as is, it's on the Pacers to prove it won't work again first. Granted, not shooting 20% from 3 would be a good start.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Papi_swav wrote:Man Knicks really needed and should've won that first game, would of been up 2-1. Having to win another game in Indy is really tough but they have to make Indy a half court team and stop letting them run wild.
BrianInPhilly wrote:Am I the only one who really doesn't like Tony Bradley's minutes for the Pacers? I think it was an overreaction to insert him to match Robinson. I'd refer Bryant just simply for continuity sake but really I like Toppin at 5' behind Turner and you can stagger his minutes to play next to Siakam or even insert Jarace Walker to play 3' and 4' off the bench too. Pacers can get back to their identity of playing 5 out offensively + pushing the pace.
xBulletproof wrote:Hoop Hunter wrote:LFGK wrote:
Cry about it, pacers suck
Seriously, are you 12? No more interactions with you. Teams win teams lose, you'll always be a loser.
Yeah, I recognized that very early on, before the series even started. I'm surprised anyone even responds, I responded once after the series started and I was like oh yeah, I forgot. Now as soon as I see the name, I just skip over it and don't even read it. It's like arguing with a toddler, they're just gonna kick, scream and cry.
It's kinda wild, I didn't have to skip many posts after games 1 and 2. As soon as the Knicks won a game, magically is here again. Can't imagine why. Ultimately, I just treat them like the toddler they act like, when you put them to bed just ignore them and they'll cry themselves to sleep eventually.
JustBuzzin wrote:I hope NY pulls this off tonight.
No disrespect to OKC and Indiana, but the Finals would be so much more exciting if the Knicks are in it.
I doubt we see any celebs at a OKC vs Indiana Finals even tho that would be a great matchup for a diehard fan.
xBulletproof wrote:JustBuzzin wrote:I hope NY pulls this off tonight.
No disrespect to OKC and Indiana, but the Finals would be so much more exciting if the Knicks are in it.
I doubt we see any celebs at a OKC vs Indiana Finals even tho that would be a great matchup for a diehard fan.
Why does a celebrity being there change anything? Celebrity worship is weird.
rockmanslim wrote:I know people have been saying KAT and Brunson can't be on the floor together because of defense, but this dude breaks it down really well for idiots like me. While watching the game I don't pay enough attention to that end of the floor to know if this is accurate, but seems legit?
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.