DOT wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Barcs wrote:Have the Knicks ever had a deep bench under Thibs? I know people say he doesn't use them anyway, but I think one of the reasons is because they aren't that good. You can't develop players that aren't good, and he did actually try to play some of them in the Pacers series. Thibs isn't going anywhere as expected. Build on what you have.
The Knicks overachieved by beating Boston and without the luckiest shot in NBA history, the Pacers lose game 1 and who knows, maybe they are in the finals now.
There really isn't a good reason as to why Wright and Shamet weren't in the rotation well before the playoffs.
The rookies aside, those two guys and Precious should have been apart of the plan as we ramped up for the post season.
Shamet played 30 total minutes over the first 14 playoff games
The last 4, he played 52 and just shot 7/13 from 3, with a +/- of +21 (only had a negative in game 6, at -1)
So is he not good, or was Thibs just not playing him until he started floundering?
Like, you can't seriously tell me that our bench is that much worse than Indy's bench. It's not a good bench, but it's not as bereft of talent as people say.
There was a lot of gaslighting going on all season.
Wright showed that he could play when Brunson was out. Shamet should have been a rotation regular as he worked his way back from injury. Precious was a rotation player last year that averaged 7ppg 7rpg 1blk per. What happened???
That's three guys not including Mitch and Deuce, or the rookies. By the time we hit late March, April we should have had all these guys playing. There really isn't a good reason for the starters to be taxed like they were.
Is the bench great? No. You can say that for pretty much 90% of the league. You work with what you have.

























