Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Loaf_of_bread
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,415
- And1: 671
- Joined: Nov 21, 2023
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Jaden's playoff efficiency numbers are LEGIT no. 2 level. Dude is a stone cold assassin. We are good now. Focusing roster construction on players that perform under pressure cannot be understated..
Jaden isn't going anywhere.
Jaden isn't going anywhere.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
ILC wrote:
Too little for Zion? No need for DET at all? Would NOP just take Randle and Rob for themselves?
This for me would address A LOT of the biggest needs the Wolves have. Both Lonzo and Zion love to push the pace, love to put pressure on the rim, both are great passers and Rudy would finally have someone to throw him lobs.
Then if Fears is really falling that hard at #17 that'd be a homerun IMO.
Zion is an injury waiting to happen. I'd stay far away no matter how good he is.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
cmoss84 wrote:Nick K wrote:cmoss84 wrote:Alright hear me out. It's summer school and the boredom is fierce. Milwaukee uses this year as a bridge year to contend AND rebuild. Get a haul for Giannis. Nets have a ton of picks, and decide to move a couple of them to sign Randle (they pick Julius over Beal). We give up everything we can to build around Ant/Jaden/Giannis, then monopolize free agency with a lot of freed up money and ring chasers (PG/PF/C).
Mil IN: Rudy, Naz (extend), DDV, RD, #17, #26, #27, #31, 2030 FRP (SAS)
Mil OUT: Giannis
RD (Lillard in '26)/DDV/Kuzma/Naz/Rudy
*Under 1st apron*
Nets IN: Randle and Minott
Nets OUT: #26 and #27
#8/#19/Cam Johnson/Randle/Claxton
*Under 1st apron*
MN IN: Giannis
MN OUT: Rudy, Randle, Naz, RD, DDV, Minott, #17, #31, 2030 FRP (SAS)
VET PG/Ant/Jaden/Giannis/Vet C
Mike/Clark/TSJ/FA/FA
Miller/Garza/FA/FA
*Under 1st apron*
($73m for 6 FA)
I love Giannis but giving up Gobert, Randle, DDV, Naz, Minott, Dilly and all those picks for Giannis???? Come on! We're sending out 120 million. Ridiculous.
How about Gobert and Randle plus a pick. That's all I'd give up. OK you could throw in Minott too. How is Minott for a sweetner?
Going to have to blow the Bucks away to acquire him. We'd have money for some damn good FA too.
I know, that may be. Still, Milwaukee is losing with Giannis and I hear they may shake things up. They get 2 starters With Gobert and Randle. Those salaries match up pretty well. I wouldn't throw in too much more. They either do it or they don't. We traded KG for chit so never say never. Gobert and Randle is a big haul for them.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
cmoss84 wrote:Ethomasp31 wrote:cmoss84 wrote:Alright hear me out. It's summer school and the boredom is fierce. Milwaukee uses this year as a bridge year to contend AND rebuild. Get a haul for Giannis. Nets have a ton of picks, and decide to move a couple of them to sign Randle (they pick Julius over Beal). We give up everything we can to build around Ant/Jaden/Giannis, then monopolize free agency with a lot of freed up money and ring chasers (PG/PF/C).
Mil IN: Rudy, Naz (extend), DDV, RD, #17, #26, #27, #31, 2030 FRP (SAS)
Mil OUT: Giannis
RD (Lillard in '26)/DDV/Kuzma/Naz/Rudy
*Under 1st apron*
Nets IN: Randle and Minott
Nets OUT: #26 and #27
#8/#19/Cam Johnson/Randle/Claxton
*Under 1st apron*
MN IN: Giannis
MN OUT: Rudy, Randle, Naz, RD, DDV, Minott, #17, #31, 2030 FRP (SAS)
VET PG/Ant/Jaden/Giannis/Vet C
Mike/Clark/TSJ/FA/FA
Miller/Garza/FA/FA
*Under 1st apron*
($73m for 6 FA)
JMD is in the trade if we get Giannis
Would you trade Rudy and Jaden for Giannis?
Wow! That's tough because I love Jaden who is on the verge of stardom. I do think I'd do it though. Giannis is the perfect fit here. Giannis could put us over the top. We could acquire a big like Sorber to take Rudy's spot. Even Kalkbrenner at #31 would do. Raynaud?
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
karch34 wrote:Chicago: Gobert and Minott
MN: Vuc and Ball
Thoughts?
Great idea! I would do that in a heartbeat. I don't think Chicago does. We'd have to throw in someone else.
I really think the Wolves are going with Dilly and Conley this year at PG. I like Ball though regardless of injury history.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Neeva
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,538
- And1: 2,912
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Vuc sucks, ball is made of glass. Rudy is worth more.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
theGreatRC
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,530
- And1: 4,992
- Joined: Oct 12, 2006
- Location: California
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
fattymcgee
- Senior
- Posts: 557
- And1: 300
- Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
frankenwolf wrote:cmoss84 wrote:Ethomasp31 wrote:
JMD is in the trade if we get Giannis
Would you trade Rudy and Jaden for Giannis?
No, Nyet, Not a chance
ABSOLUTELY make that trade!!!! Are you friggen nuts? Jaden might never make an allstar game and Rudy is only getting worse and you wouldn't give them up for an MVP in his prime?
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,967
- And1: 1,274
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Giannis is the 2nd or 3rd best player in the world.....
think of what you'd accept for a ANT trade, then add three unprotected picks
think of what you'd accept for a ANT trade, then add three unprotected picks
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Rookie-Mistake
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,435
- And1: 523
- Joined: Jun 27, 2008
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
shangrila
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,548
- And1: 6,625
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Rookie-Mistake wrote:What value does NAW sign and trade net us?
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
A second. Maybe two depending on what if any salary we're taking back
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,760
- And1: 5,248
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
I wonder if any NAW sign-and-trade means no DDV trade
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,760
- And1: 5,248
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
dschroeder01
- Sophomore
- Posts: 115
- And1: 73
- Joined: Jun 16, 2004
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Rookie-Mistake wrote:What value does NAW sign and trade net us?
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
Word is that the Hawks, at roughly $30 million below the luxury-tax line, are expected to register interest in a sign-and-trade deal with Minnesota to try to acquire Nickeil Alexander-Walker — among various options that Atlanta is exploring with its trade and financial flexibility — in the event that the Timberwolves, in their quests to re-sign Julius Randle and Naz Reid, run out of the flexibility needed to re-sign Alexander-Walker.
-Mark Stein
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
dschroeder01
- Sophomore
- Posts: 115
- And1: 73
- Joined: Jun 16, 2004
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
minimus wrote:I wonder if any NAW sign-and-trade means no DDV trade
Word is that Donte moved out of his house yesterday.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Norseman79
- Starter
- Posts: 2,420
- And1: 876
- Joined: Jul 26, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
So...Collin Sexton...I have watched/know very little...worth targeting or poor fit?
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
dschroeder01
- Sophomore
- Posts: 115
- And1: 73
- Joined: Jun 16, 2004
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
shangrila wrote:Rookie-Mistake wrote:What value does NAW sign and trade net us?
Sent from my SM-G991B using RealGM mobile app
A second. Maybe two depending on what if any salary we're taking back
Taking back salary is really hard given the matching rules for players like NAW getting a greater than 20% raise. It's why the Atlanta thing is so interesting as they have a $25M trade exception from the Murray trade. They could send us a pick and easily fit him into that exception.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
Guest84
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,826
- And1: 892
- Joined: Dec 13, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
I came across an article suggesting DDV/Rob for Coby White. But I've seen other places suggesting more than that for White.
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,967
- And1: 1,274
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Norseman79 wrote:So...Collin Sexton...I have watched/know very little...worth targeting or poor fit?
he's the top "realistic" guard for me
he just really hasn't had a chance to be on a good team
drafted by post-Lebron rebuilding Cavs, got hurt the year they got Mobley/Lauri and were turning the corner, then was traded for D Mitchell
his competitiveness is something that Jim Petersen would always point out on tv broadcast
friends with ANT as they are both from Atlanta area
he's not really a "PG" in terms of passing and running an offense, and is going to be limited defensively like most "PG" sized players
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
-
MN7725
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,967
- And1: 1,274
- Joined: Jun 19, 2017
Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning
Guest84 wrote:I came across an article suggesting DDV/Rob for Coby White. But I've seen other places suggesting more than that for White.
I don't really see a big difference in skill sets/limitations between Sexton and C White, White has just played in a bigger market on a semi-competitive team
if Sexton is available for less
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



