Suns are moving up in second round
LETSSSSS GO!!
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Suns are moving up in second round
dremill24 wrote:Adding No. 36 for two future 2nds
Sunsdeuce wrote:https://www.newsweek.com/sports/nba/massive-trade-deal-strikes-between-nets-suns-prior-nba-draft-2091326
Sunsdeuce wrote:https://www.newsweek.com/sports/nba/massive-trade-deal-strikes-between-nets-suns-prior-nba-draft-2091326
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Djedefre wrote:Maluach IS NOT the best center in this draft. No matter how many times you type it, it won't become a fact. He may become the best in 3-4 years, but right now the odds don't look so great. Not to say it's impossible, just that it's far more likely he becomes a bust than some kind of an anchor for us in years to come. With him, we're left with hope he develops into a solid starting C, and hope is a dangerous thing. We all know that.
He was first C drafted and you'd be hard pressed to find many sites that didn't have him the top ranked C prospect. Shrug
Djedefre wrote:WeekapaugGroove wrote:Djedefre wrote:Maluach IS NOT the best center in this draft. No matter how many times you type it, it won't become a fact. He may become the best in 3-4 years, but right now the odds don't look so great. Not to say it's impossible, just that it's far more likely he becomes a bust than some kind of an anchor for us in years to come. With him, we're left with hope he develops into a solid starting C, and hope is a dangerous thing. We all know that.
He was first C drafted and you'd be hard pressed to find many sites that didn't have him the top ranked C prospect. Shrug
Dragan Bender was pretty much consensus top5 pick that damned year, based on the same 'evaluation process' from all the same sites and draftheads. All that silly talk about some huge potential, great promise when almost none of them actually saw him play real games. His whole draft stock was built on that smoke of 'potential' and unicorn-ish appearance when in reality there was so small a sample to judge from, and even that was not particularly impressive whatsoever.
Back to Maluach - he did not play a ton of minutes, was on a loaded Duke squad, did not show any really impressive trait. Defense was good, but nothing out of this world, he was finishing the most basic things after being served on a pletter while being like half a foot taller than 99% of competition. Not an impressive rebounder for his size, like at all. He is tall, has big wingspan, played for Duke and that's why people are so high on him. Shooting and bball iq are big unknowns. I did not see anything from him that makes me particularly excited. Maybe he's a hard worker and will improve over the years, but he certainly has A LOT of work to do.
Sunsdeuce wrote:Maluach Was mocked anywhere from 6-15 in this draft. Suns acting like it was impossible he would fall to them at 10 is pure ignorance. Even if they thought he wouldn’t drop, you wait to see how it plays out BEFORE you make a trade where you overpay (again) for a player.
It’s not like the Suns had to wait all night to see how it would play out. And I think it’s very apparent now, Mark Williams wasn’t getting the value around the league the Hornets wanted so they turned to good ole reliable Mr overpay himself, Mr Ishbia.
I’m seeing a lot of excuses for this botched trade. It’s ok to call a duck a duck. This was a silly ill advised, unprepared trade to get Mark Williams.
And Mark Williams injury history is very real and a cause for pause in any trade scenario thus reducing his value as an asset.
TeamTragic wrote:Djedefre wrote:KdoubleDees23 wrote:
So mr GM. Should the suns have passed on Maluach? If so, who would you have grabbed at 10 that would have made you happen.
I'd trade down, pick up an asset and avoid the pressure od taking someone just because the media and 'pundits' expect it. Or, in this particular case, if we were so desperate for filling the center spot, i'd just make the #29 and select Maxime or Ryan and use the #10 as a trade chip to improve and balance out the roster.
Why would we trade down if the player we want dropped outside the top 5 and was available at #10?
You are not making any sense and it appears you just want to complain.