Godymas wrote:MGB8 wrote:Godymas wrote:
oh so you have the hardest ring in the history of the NBA
Sounds achievable, it’s not like Giannis has a HoFer veteran named Jason Kidd or Shawn Marion or a Tyson Chandler or even a Jason Terry
Moving the goal posts. You asked, one was found.
Meanwhile, even that was a goalpost move since the original poster talked about being a contender, not necessarily winning.
And Giannis is better than Dirk was that year, and Turner adds more on offense than Tyson.
Oh, prior year champ Lakers lost Adam Morrison, who was taking up 10% of cap. If I look more, will find more similar examples, maybe not of champs and maybe not 15%, but close enough and of contenders. (Heck, Porzingis 2 years ago was making 36 million and only played 7 games in the playoffs, though managed to play 3/4 or so of regular season).
Sit down.
Nah, I already explained it in modern context.
This is equivalent to Denver without Aaron Gordon or Draymond on the Warriors.
In the modern CBA, it isn’t possible.
Porzingis was mentioned in OP, but the Cs spent a significant amount more on the luxury tax.
If you take a moment to analyze by era and consider the situation in it’s entirety, maybe you might realize that the only people that tell other’s to “sit down” on the internet are those that need to touch grass.
So you dare other posters to look on every NBA title team historically to prove you wrong and when someone did found a much higher percentage salary than Dame's strecth salary you are now changing the goal post to modern era and not historically anymore?
Godymas wrote:name a team that has won the championship with that salary on their roster
look at every team historically, name one that has won with $22.5 million of nothing on their roster. The only half example is Boston with Porzingis, and Milwaukee has no one comparable to Jaylen Brown or even Jrue Holiday as a 2nd and 4th option.