maradro wrote:QMemphis wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:
Feels like we're talking past each other. I just talked about the team getting better by trading him away, and you're coming back wanting me to acknowledge it was a huge disadvantage to be without him. Those two things, I think are mutually exclusive.
I think I should also emphasize that, at least for people like me, we're not making excuses for why the Spurs had an extreme upset loss, we're specifically pointing attention to Ginobili as a really, really big deal. How big of a deal? Well, I consider him to be have been a better basketball player than any player I can think of who wore a Grizzly uniform at any time since their start as an expansion team, and I say this someone who probably rates Gasol, Conley & Allen higher than most. It's not meant to bash the Grizzlies as a franchise, it's meant to illustrate how big of a deal I would say Ginobili was.
I'll say by contrast, Tony Parker? Meh, I'd prefer to have Conley. I'm not a super-Spurs guy here, I'm just really high on Ginobili compared to most.
I understand your point but don’t agree. Because you think the Grizz were better without Rudy doesn’t mean it was true. You have made clear your opinions and so have I but fact remains Grizz played without their 2nd best player and still made it to the 2nd round pushing OKC to 7 games. The excuse of Manu being injured changed things is just that an excuse.
Injury excuse is always an excuse, grizzlies beat the team in front of them and nobody can change that
However, there's no comparison between 2011 Manu to 2011 Rudy gay, if Manu didn't come back in game 2 the spurs would have been swept, Manu was the spurs best player and top 15 in the league that year, gay was probably not even the grizzlies 2nd best player
I’m not debating who is the better player. I am clearly stating that Grizz were missing their 2nd best player and if you don’t believe Rudy was the 2nd best who do you think was and why.