Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Who ranks higher?

Player A (Peak)
44
66%
Player B (Longevity)
23
34%
 
Total votes: 67

benson13
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,478
And1: 1,322
Joined: Feb 01, 2017
     

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#41 » by benson13 » Wed Jul 16, 2025 6:57 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:People talk about Bo Jackson’s short nfl stint as if he was player A level. The what if guys get wayyyy overrated.


That is true, but a lot of those guys are overrated based on speculation on how good they could have been. Len Bias never played in the NBA and Arvydas Sabonis was never an NBA all-star. It's all speculation based on their college and international play respectively.

We saw Bo Jackson in the NFL though. I do think he gets overrated, but he was a legitimately good professional football player, and for several of his 3/4 seasons he was one of the league's best rushers.
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,267
And1: 12,423
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#42 » by Lalouie » Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:17 pm

Bloodbather wrote:Player A) Averages 50 PPG, 13 RPG, 12 APG, 3 BPG, 3 SPG for a season and wins the title as a rookie. Thinks he has completed basketball and gets bored with it, but still has to play to make money, and averages around 16 PPG, 5 RPG, 4 APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG and half-asses things on defense for seven more seasons to collect a paycheck and retires.

Player B) Averages around 20 PPG, 5 RPG, 5, APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG on decent efficiency for 30 seasons. Decent defender, also. Still puts up around 15-4-4 on decent efficiency in his late 40s. Plays 70+ games every season during that run. Has won 6 titles in total, being no more than a third option in any of them.

Who ranks higher on an all-time list?


actually a very unbalanced comparison heavily weighted towards the steady player as he virtually has NO faults while the other dude has only ONE SEASON

i mean,,,30seasons which is three generations versus one stinking one-hit wonder season. where in life does the one hit wonder get any recognition whatsoever.

howz about making playerB a bench playing journeyman good enuf that everyone wants but not good enuf to keep and always in the trade discussions with SLIGHTLY BELOW LEAGUE AVERAGE efficiency instead of "decent".....and give playerA 2rings at least so'z he meant something to the game instead of being a footnote in the reference section of wiki :D :D :D

i mean, you've painted a picture of a 3x hof candidate versus fodder for 30for30
ropjhk
RealGM
Posts: 19,370
And1: 12,483
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
     

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#43 » by ropjhk » Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:10 pm

Lalouie wrote:
Bloodbather wrote:Player A) Averages 50 PPG, 13 RPG, 12 APG, 3 BPG, 3 SPG for a season and wins the title as a rookie. Thinks he has completed basketball and gets bored with it, but still has to play to make money, and averages around 16 PPG, 5 RPG, 4 APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG and half-asses things on defense for seven more seasons to collect a paycheck and retires.

Player B) Averages around 20 PPG, 5 RPG, 5, APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG on decent efficiency for 30 seasons. Decent defender, also. Still puts up around 15-4-4 on decent efficiency in his late 40s. Plays 70+ games every season during that run. Has won 6 titles in total, being no more than a third option in any of them.

Who ranks higher on an all-time list?


actually a very unbalanced comparison heavily weighted towards the steady player as he virtually has NO faults while the other dude has only ONE SEASON

i mean,,,30seasons which is three generations versus one stinking one-hit wonder season. where in life does the one hit wonder get any recognition whatsoever.

howz about making playerB a bench playing journeyman good enuf that everyone wants but not good enuf to keep and always in the trade discussions with SLIGHTLY BELOW LEAGUE AVERAGE efficiency instead of "decent".....and give playerA 2rings at least so'z he meant something to the game instead of being a footnote in the reference section of wiki :D :D :D

i mean, you've painted a picture of a 3x hof candidate versus fodder for 30for30


Fodder? We're talking about a player who blows away all other player seasons in the entire history of sports. Yes, we're talking about a one hit wonder, but it's as if that hit is far and away the most popular song of all time.

Player A shouldn't be thought of like any other one hit wonder. You should be thinking of them as someone who made THE greatest hit of all time. An accomplishment that would be talked about forever.

Likewise, Player B isn't just any well respected long lived player. 30 years would far exceed any current longevity records. Averaging starter level stats well into their 40s would be something that only Lebron has a chance to do in real life.

Another example I just came up with is from baseball. Consider Dwight Gooden and Tommy John (the guy who has a surgical procedure name after him). I was about to use Nolan Ryan, but Nolan Ryan had too many excellent years that I didn't think would fit the archetype.

Dwight Gooden was a dominant pitcher right away winning ROY his first year, CYA his second year and the World Series his 3rd year. He dropped off in production soon after that having dealt with drugs and injuries.

Tommy John was known for his longevity and for being the first MLB pitcher to undergo what is now known as Tommy John surgery midway through his career. Post surgery Tommy played another 14 seasons and had the best stretch of his career in his mid 30s. The only thing that doesn't match up is that Tommy John never won a World Series and Player B is a multi champion.
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 8,998
And1: 8,484
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#44 » by Hornet Mania » Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:20 pm

Anyone who averages a 50pt triple double, even for just one championship season, will be rated above only a handful of players at most. This comparison underestimates how much of an insane outlier that is. It would be like hitting 100 home runs in baseball or throwing 70 TD passes in a single NFL season. it doesn't even matter if that guy played another game, he's already established himself as the greatest player to ever walk on a court at his best.

The short-list greats could make an argument against that, because they could at least also drive you to multiple title runs even if none were so incredible. A HOF 2nd/3rd option wouldn't even be in the conversation, longevity or not.
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,267
And1: 12,423
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#45 » by Lalouie » Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:27 pm

ropjhk wrote:
Lalouie wrote:
Bloodbather wrote:Player A) Averages 50 PPG, 13 RPG, 12 APG, 3 BPG, 3 SPG for a season and wins the title as a rookie. Thinks he has completed basketball and gets bored with it, but still has to play to make money, and averages around 16 PPG, 5 RPG, 4 APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG and half-asses things on defense for seven more seasons to collect a paycheck and retires.

Player B) Averages around 20 PPG, 5 RPG, 5, APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG on decent efficiency for 30 seasons. Decent defender, also. Still puts up around 15-4-4 on decent efficiency in his late 40s. Plays 70+ games every season during that run. Has won 6 titles in total, being no more than a third option in any of them.

Who ranks higher on an all-time list?


actually a very unbalanced comparison heavily weighted towards the steady player as he virtually has NO faults while the other dude has only ONE SEASON

i mean,,,30seasons which is three generations versus one stinking one-hit wonder season. where in life does the one hit wonder get any recognition whatsoever.

howz about making playerB a bench playing journeyman good enuf that everyone wants but not good enuf to keep and always in the trade discussions with SLIGHTLY BELOW LEAGUE AVERAGE efficiency instead of "decent".....and give playerA 2rings at least so'z he meant something to the game instead of being a footnote in the reference section of wiki :D :D :D

i mean, you've painted a picture of a 3x hof candidate versus fodder for 30for30


Fodder? We're talking about a player who blows away all other player seasons in the entire history of sports. Yes, we're talking about a one hit wonder, but it's as if that hit is far and away the most popular song of all time.

Player A shouldn't be thought of like any other one hit wonder. You should be thinking of them as someone who made THE greatest hit of all time. An accomplishment that would be talked about forever.

Likewise, Player B isn't just any well respected long lived player. 30 years would far exceed any current longevity records. Averaging starter level stats well into their 40s would be something that only Lebron has a chance to do in real life.

Another example I just came up with is from baseball. Consider Dwight Gooden and Tommy John (the guy who has a surgical procedure name after him). I was about to use Nolan Ryan, but Nolan Ryan had too many excellent years that I didn't think would fit the archetype.

Dwight Gooden was a dominant pitcher right away winning ROY his first year, CYA his second year and the World Series his 3rd year. He dropped off in production soon after that having dealt with drugs and injuries.

Tommy John was known for his longevity and for being the first MLB pitcher to undergo what is now known as Tommy John surgery midway through his career. Post surgery Tommy played another 14 seasons and had the best stretch of his career in his mid 30s. The only thing that doesn't match up is that Tommy John never won a World Series and Player B is a multi champion.


the comparison is like "tin cup" mcavoy and jrue

the op stated playerA made a choice. that means his head isn't in it
Vae Victus
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,127
And1: 1,930
Joined: Jun 09, 2013

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#46 » by Vae Victus » Wed Jul 16, 2025 10:18 pm

Can Player A bust out god mode whenever he feels like during the remainder of his career? Basically, “eh just this game I’m gonna remind yall who I am” then goes back to being a lazy piece of **** afterwards. Cuz if he sprinkles in a few of those games through the rest of his career while remaining a lazy piece of ****, it’s basically confirmation he’s the literal greatest player and piece of **** ever, not a one season wonder.
GeorgeSears
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,471
And1: 5,873
Joined: Feb 10, 2021
 

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#47 » by GeorgeSears » Wed Jul 16, 2025 10:33 pm

Extreme peak.

Longevity is impressive, but it has a lot to do with luck. The era you played in, the technology available, health luck/injury avoidance all contribute to longer careers.

Players with extreme peaks means that they've maximized their potential. They've actually strived for something and achieved it. There's significantly less luck involved with that.
User avatar
-Sammy-
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,174
And1: 22,249
Joined: Sep 03, 2014
Location: Back at Frontier Burger
     

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#48 » by -Sammy- » Thu Jul 17, 2025 12:21 am

I'd rather hear Miles Davis live once than go to all of Justin Bieber's shows.
Image
SlimShady83
RealGM
Posts: 14,658
And1: 4,473
Joined: Jun 19, 2012

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#49 » by SlimShady83 » Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:24 am

Player A... Player B should only count if on the one the team, shots fired somewhere :lol:
My Go Team
Magic, Jordan, Bird, Duncan, Shaq

My Counter
Stockton, Kobe, Pippen, Rodman, Dirk

Today's Team
Luka, SGA, Tatum, Giannis, Wemby
User avatar
Bloodbather
Pro Prospect
Posts: 859
And1: 1,661
Joined: Dec 23, 2023
 

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#50 » by Bloodbather » Thu Jul 17, 2025 6:45 am

Lalouie wrote:
Bloodbather wrote:Player A) Averages 50 PPG, 13 RPG, 12 APG, 3 BPG, 3 SPG for a season and wins the title as a rookie. Thinks he has completed basketball and gets bored with it, but still has to play to make money, and averages around 16 PPG, 5 RPG, 4 APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG and half-asses things on defense for seven more seasons to collect a paycheck and retires.

Player B) Averages around 20 PPG, 5 RPG, 5, APG, 1 BPG, 1 SPG on decent efficiency for 30 seasons. Decent defender, also. Still puts up around 15-4-4 on decent efficiency in his late 40s. Plays 70+ games every season during that run. Has won 6 titles in total, being no more than a third option in any of them.

Who ranks higher on an all-time list?


actually a very unbalanced comparison heavily weighted towards the steady player as he virtually has NO faults while the other dude has only ONE SEASON

i mean,,,30seasons which is three generations versus one stinking one-hit wonder season. where in life does the one hit wonder get any recognition whatsoever.

howz about making playerB a bench playing journeyman good enuf that everyone wants but not good enuf to keep and always in the trade discussions with SLIGHTLY BELOW LEAGUE AVERAGE efficiency instead of "decent".....and give playerA 2rings at least so'z he meant something to the game instead of being a footnote in the reference section of wiki :D :D :D

i mean, you've painted a picture of a 3x hof candidate versus fodder for 30for30


Yet Player A is clearly leading the poll and some have even argued that I made it too unbalanced in the opposite direction. People have peak and longevity at different coefficients.

You're entitled to your opinion, but it appears that I've succeeded in making it close enough to get people thinking.
User avatar
Grinditout
RealGM
Posts: 10,618
And1: 2,752
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#51 » by Grinditout » Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:30 pm

I think longevity player could stand out more if those championship rings are with at least several different teams as opposed to one.
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,204
And1: 20,654
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#52 » by AussieBuck » Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:44 pm

Best is player A, greatest is player B. Question is how do you rank them. Answer is one guy is higher on the best list of all time and the other is higher on the greatest list.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,150
And1: 27,095
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#53 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:49 pm

benson13 wrote:
NO-KG-AI wrote:People talk about Bo Jackson’s short nfl stint as if he was player A level. The what if guys get wayyyy overrated.


That is true, but a lot of those guys are overrated based on speculation on how good they could have been. Len Bias never played in the NBA and Arvydas Sabonis was never an NBA all-star. It's all speculation based on their college and international play respectively.

We saw Bo Jackson in the NFL though. I do think he gets overrated, but he was a legitimately good professional football player, and for several of his 3/4 seasons he was one of the league's best rushers.


But this dude played 7 more healthy seasons and does nothing with them. Looks like an average starter that whole time.
balrog27
Junior
Posts: 378
And1: 217
Joined: Feb 07, 2015

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#54 » by balrog27 » Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:32 am

Player A would be like the most hated player in NBA history LMAO. I'd say their personality would play a role too. I will take B because we've never seen a player play 30 seasons while still being a productive player. 6 rings is no joke in today's game. We've already seen someone average 50 before.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,554
And1: 6,422
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#55 » by CharityStripe34 » Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:16 pm

Is it more memorable to catch a comet or shooting star in a clear sky, or knowing that you'll usually be able to find the big dipper every night? Hey, I tried.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
KGtabake
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,637
And1: 7,508
Joined: Jan 28, 2019
 

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#56 » by KGtabake » Fri Jul 18, 2025 3:33 pm

Soccer example

Ronaldinho 2002-2006 >>>>>>> Ronaldo 2003-2025(and counting)

Depends on what your pick looks like.
And peak Ronaldinho was an alien.
Regardless of titles. Otherworldly.

Basketball example

Larry Bird 1980-1987 >>>>>>>> Kevin Durant 2007-2025(and counting)

I don't think there has been a better basketball player than Larry Bird 1984-85-86.
Durant can go and win titles with the Rockets.
No matter what he does, he will never reach this level.

So, in this particular example I'll go with Player A.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,554
And1: 6,422
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: Extreme Peak vs Extreme Longevity 

Post#57 » by CharityStripe34 » Fri Jul 18, 2025 4:19 pm

KGtabake wrote:Soccer example

Ronaldinho 2002-2006 >>>>>>> Ronaldo 2003-2025(and counting)

Depends on what your pick looks like.
And peak Ronaldinho was an alien.
Regardless of titles. Otherworldly.

Basketball example

Larry Bird 1980-1987 >>>>>>>> Kevin Durant 2007-2025(and counting)

I don't think there has been a better basketball player than Larry Bird 1984-85-86.
Durant can go and win titles with the Rockets.
No matter what he does, he will never reach this level.

So, in this particular example I'll go with Player A.


I would've used Ronaldo Fenomeno 96-99 as the REAL Ronaldo, LOL, but Gaucho works as he was also incredible. Ronaldo Nazario, to my eyes, is still the best football player I've ever seen, especially pre-injury in the mid-late 90s. Some would also say Marco Van Basten.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS

Return to The General Board