KGdaBom wrote:Norseman79 wrote:It's amazing how many player that gets mentioned as a possible PG just gets shredded on here. First up, we are at the point where an avg starter would likely be an upgrade...avg. Next, Wolves have 1 star, 1, it's Edwards. People can talk up Randle, Rudy, Etc all they want, but it's Edwards and then a big gap. The idea of giving up Randle, Rudy, etc to get a starting PG might be a shell game in some ways, but it's not like our current team's floor would change that much if we did something (obviously not stupid like Gobert for Tyus Jones type of stuff). This player's efficiency, that players shot, this player's size, that player's defense.....my God, you aren't getting a perfect player back and Randle, Rudy, etc aren't getting you a top 5 or 10 guy, unless there is a big concern.
I would make a push to get a Simons/Hauser package done, and I would use Randle/DD to do it. I know people hate Simons, I'm just telling you I think he unlocks with Finch playing next to Edwards.
I'm going to continue the shredding of the possible PGs. Simon's is virtually worthless and you're talking about giving up our 2nd star and one of the best volume 3 point shooters in the NBA to get him???????????
Guessing you don't know who Sam Hauser is? Simons would be better next to Ant than Randle is, and I will stand by that.
Simons would snipe next to Edwards and also be able to create for himself. He basically averaged 5 asst per game last year on that awful Portland team, it jumps to 8 here and likely to cut down on turnovers too
