Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, DG88, HiJiNX
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
Fairview4Life
- RealGM
- Posts: 70,406
- And1: 34,173
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Lots of people think rich people are smart enough to not do x, y or z very stupid thing. I have some news: they are not.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
brownbobcat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,880
- And1: 3,818
- Joined: Jun 09, 2006
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
StopitLeo wrote:What I am most curious about is whether they would actually void the remaining years of Kawhi's contract.
That would be extremely interesting.
Although that technically happened with Joe Smith, it was really about voiding his Bird rights as he was signing a bunch of 1-year deals. So they didn't exactly take away any owed money, just negated his ability to sign a big money deal.
Kawhi has over $100M remaining on his contract, that is a much different scenario.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
- ontnut
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,233
- And1: 9,197
- Joined: Jan 31, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
StopitLeo wrote:ItsDanger wrote:
The more interesting part is Aspiration. Oaktree Capital Management was heavily involved in 2 rounds of financing for this fraud, totaling at least $450M. Oaktree is 62% owned by Brookfield, our recently elected PM's previous employer. Not a good look.
I find Aspiration interesting only because it is a classic VC ponzi-esque scheme all the way to its SPAC merger. It was a company that provided an aura of legitimacy but could easily be used in the way that the Clippers allegedly did.
Brookfield's ownership in Oaktree isn't that consequential when you consider that $450M represents 0.00045% of the 1 Trillion dollars in assets that that Brookfield has under management.
Unless Ballmer or the Clippers left a paper trail it could be tough for the league to hand down a "stern" punishment. This is despite the fact that Kawhi had a contract with Aspiration where he explicitly wasn't required to do anything AND his compensation was tied to being/remaining a Clipper, terms that are so sketchy.
$450m is 0.045% of a trillion. Not THAT many zeroes.

Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
Jerry Lucas
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,898
- And1: 1,851
- Joined: Apr 01, 2021
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
My Masai/Bobby-type FRP Barttorvik queries: 4/4, zero misses
Team Find The Next Superstar Closer
Team Find The Next Superstar Closer
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
DelAbbot
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,498
- And1: 21,908
- Joined: May 22, 2019
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
CPT wrote:I’m getting further radicalized the more I hear about this story.
Force Ballmer to sell. They did it for Sterling and Sarver (I think?) who were clearly worse people, but didn’t have the same history of breaking league rules. The league doesn’t need Ballmer at all. There will be no shortage of other **** billionaires willing to buy the Clippers. He’ll make a 200-300% return on his investment as a “penalty.”
Ban Kawhi for life. While I think Ballmer takes more of the blame pie, there have to be real consequences for players agreeing to take these shady deals.
NBPA won't allow the loss of 1 cent, let alone voiding of contract or ban for life. That's beyond wishful thinking.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
PushDaRock
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,160
- And1: 12,018
- Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
- NinjaBro
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,087
- And1: 43,808
- Joined: Aug 21, 2014
- Location: Shamblesland
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Utter disgrace
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
Mark_83
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,877
- And1: 3,898
- Joined: Jun 26, 2008
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Jerry Lucas wrote:
Predictable.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
havlat
- Freshman
- Posts: 87
- And1: 8
- Joined: May 21, 2005
- Location: Canada
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
I don't think Silver's comments tell us much either way. Could it suggest a slap on the wrist is coming? Perhaps. But if the league sees itself possibly handing down a heavy penalty at the end of this investigation, they might also try to establish from the outset that the burden is high and the process will be a fair, non-reactionary one.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
tecumseh18
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,160
- And1: 11,388
- Joined: Feb 20, 2006
- Location: Big green house
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
I'm not sure I want the guy who blamed Masai for being manhandled by a security guard making the judgment call here. His concept of "burden of proof" seems wonky.
But it's too early to read anything into Silver's comments. Of course he's not gonna act has judge/jury/executioner before the investigation is complete.
But it's too early to read anything into Silver's comments. Of course he's not gonna act has judge/jury/executioner before the investigation is complete.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
inonba
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 995
- And1: 472
- Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
StopitLeo wrote:I know that circumstantial evidence can be sufficient for the league per the CBA.
I assume Ballmer is smart enough to have plausible deniability though, so someone else will take the fall (Lawrence Frank?). In terms of punishment, obviously they'd take away draft picks but I think they should also take away their ability to use cap exceptions (at least some of them). What I am most curious about is whether they would actually void the remaining years of Kawhi's contract.
This is why Ballmer is in hot water. By my count, there are at least 2 actions by Ballmer can be viewed as a conscious of guilt.
1. He used his personal LLC to finance the deal. On its own, it's not too damaging, but when you combine it with
2. He paid above market price for share to circumvent NBA reporting requirements, then the deniability become difficult to explain away.
Reminds me of people laundering money. Carrying large sums of cash across the border, depositing cash into bank accounts. Many think as long as the amount is below the reporting requirements, they're in the clear.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
inonba
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 995
- And1: 472
- Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
DelAbbot wrote:CPT wrote:I’m getting further radicalized the more I hear about this story.
Force Ballmer to sell. They did it for Sterling and Sarver (I think?) who were clearly worse people, but didn’t have the same history of breaking league rules. The league doesn’t need Ballmer at all. There will be no shortage of other **** billionaires willing to buy the Clippers. He’ll make a 200-300% return on his investment as a “penalty.”
Ban Kawhi for life. While I think Ballmer takes more of the blame pie, there have to be real consequences for players agreeing to take these shady deals.
NBPA won't allow the loss of 1 cent, let alone voiding of contract or ban for life. That's beyond wishful thinking.
Voiding of the contract is definitely on the table if the NBA finds the Clippers and Kawhi entered into an illegal agreement. Also, they can also make him forfeit the illegal endorsement money. Although unlikely, there is a chance the bankruptcy trustee sues Kawhi for the return of the endorsement money if enough creditors cry foul. If the sources from Pablo are to be trusted, Kawhi was given payment preference over other creditors. Combine that with no work was produced, there is a case for fraudulent transfer.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
Bankai
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,812
- And1: 28,659
- Joined: Oct 16, 2006
- Location: Toronto, ON
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
The new reports of what Kawhi and Uncle Dennis demanded from MLSE such as stakes, and bonuses is wild. If this gets sweeped under the rug..
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
TGM
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,199
- And1: 1,089
- Joined: Dec 19, 2004
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Johnny Bball wrote:**** that guy. I just want to see the clippers get hammered with penalties. There's no way they can just sweep this under the rug now.
Jewish owner, Jewish commissioner and predominantly Jewish owners in the rest of the league. Pretty sure will be a much lighter slap on the wrist. Even though there is precedent of Kawhi asking for it. Doesn’t mean it was done. You can spin the endorsement deals six ways to Sunday.
If this guy was a Chinese or Indian owner would probably be forced to sell the team. Just the way the world works.
Warned: Inappropriate comment
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
- WaltFrazier
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,341
- And1: 31,807
- Joined: Jan 21, 2006
- Location: Ontario Canada
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
TGM wrote:Johnny Bball wrote:**** that guy. I just want to see the clippers get hammered with penalties. There's no way they can just sweep this under the rug now.
Jewish owner, Jewish commissioner and predominantly Jewish owners in the rest of the league. Pretty sure will be a much lighter slap on the wrist. Even though there is precedent of Kawhi asking for it. Doesn’t mean it was done. You can spin the endorsement deals six ways to Sunday.
If this guy was a Chinese or Indian owner would probably be forced to sell the team. Just the way the world works.
Donald Sterling was forced to sell
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
TGM
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,199
- And1: 1,089
- Joined: Dec 19, 2004
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Donald’s Sterling scandal was totally next level. Would have cost the nba all the owners and players a ton of money.WaltFrazier wrote:TGM wrote:Johnny Bball wrote:**** that guy. I just want to see the clippers get hammered with penalties. There's no way they can just sweep this under the rug now.
Jewish owner, Jewish commissioner and predominantly Jewish owners in the rest of the league. Pretty sure will be a much lighter slap on the wrist. Even though there is precedent of Kawhi asking for it. Doesn’t mean it was done. You can spin the endorsement deals six ways to Sunday.
If this guy was a Chinese or Indian owner would probably be forced to sell the team. Just the way the world works.
Donald Sterling was forced to sell
Sterlings
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
inonba
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 995
- And1: 472
- Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
WaltFrazier wrote:Donald Sterling was forced to sell
".....And he was the whitest SOB I've seen in my entire life" narrated in my Foghorn Leghorn voice.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
- notagenius
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,365
- And1: 2,667
- Joined: Jun 12, 2003
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
Clippers co owner invested 2 mil into aspiration just a few days before kawhi's quarterly 1.75 mil was due.
This happened while the company was failing, employees weren’t being paid and layoffs were underway.
To add to it, the co-owner’s daughter was working there as a project manager.
Yeah this **** stinks.
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
- WuTang_CMB
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,739
- And1: 52,294
- Joined: Sep 26, 2017
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
-
Jadoogar
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,451
- And1: 17,108
- Joined: May 06, 2010
-
Re: Kawhi "no-show job" that paid $28M
this should be the nail in the coffin for the "Ballmer didn't know anything" people.









