The Consiglieri wrote:
You guys are swinging WAY too much from result to result.
Weren't you the guy making a big deal about what Ace was doing in a couple of preseason games?
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
The Consiglieri wrote:
You guys are swinging WAY too much from result to result.

The Consiglieri wrote:tontoz wrote:Easy to forget we were down 14 early before we opened up the can.....
Or that we were down by 20 against the Bucks before still getting our ----- kicked by double digits, a Bucks team people expect to be about .500.
You guys are swinging WAY too much from result to result. We suck, this guy sucks! This guy's god mode, we're not keeping our pick and I'm fine with it (which is insane, no offense to you two, but it is)".
Games will swing back and forth dramatically because we have young improving players, and quality old vets mixed in, but roster for roster there's a reason the O/U on our win total was 20.5. Vegas, and everyone else expects us to be a bit better, but not much better, and still they all see us as a bottom 3 side.
This is a season about watching player development and improvement and celebrating it, and not fixating so much on results that you turn into Debbie downer whenever the team ----'s the bed. Rely on me to be your Debbie downer, and just enjoy the players working slowly but surely to find out what caliber of player they are in the NBA.
This isn't a 40 win team people, at best, we're at risk at winning 30ish, but I think an O/U of 20.5 was probably reasonable. I suspect we'll win 22-25. The org is not going to let the team win 35 games or whatever. They aren't idiots. The only way that happens is if the young guys are actually hidden stars, and not just mostly complimentary players with maybe 1 or 2 with higher upside.
Enjoy the games, but man the yo you effect result to result in here is NUTS.
payitforward wrote:CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Ky George is maybe the only thing Dawkins has done right on this squad. Still a lot to be seen, but he's the type of archetype this team should be developing.
All the other pieces are soft. This kid on the other hand is interesting.
Tell you what -- you are a hard man to please!
nate33 wrote:I agree with Consiglieri. We need to dial back the talk about the tank being in jeopardy. The Wizards still aren't very good. We can't overlook that the Dallas Mavericks are a mess and are implementing a ridiculous strategy of playing Flagg at PG. A mediocre Spurs team that just barely dispatched the Pelicans in overtime routed Dallas by 33.
I didn't think we would be a 19-win disaster team like the Vegas odds suggested, but I'm also not worried about winning 30 games either. I expect Kyshawn's production to fall off a little bit once teams start bothering to scout him.
dobrojim wrote:Still many unknowns to unfold.

nate33 wrote:When Bilal gets back, I would like to see a starting lineup of Tre, Bilal, Middleton, Kyshawn and Sarr. There's enough ball handlers and ball movers in that group that we don't need a PG at all.
WallToWall wrote:nate33 wrote:When Bilal gets back, I would like to see a starting lineup of Tre, Bilal, Middleton, Kyshawn and Sarr. There's enough ball handlers and ball movers in that group that we don't need a PG at all.
two point-forwards, and two guards that are automatic. If/when Whitmore and Tre improve their handles, I think a lineup of Tre, Bilal, Cam, Kyshawn, and Alex would be interesting.
SUPERBALLMAN wrote:WallToWall wrote:nate33 wrote:When Bilal gets back, I would like to see a starting lineup of Tre, Bilal, Middleton, Kyshawn and Sarr. There's enough ball handlers and ball movers in that group that we don't need a PG at all.
two point-forwards, and two guards that are automatic. If/when Whitmore and Tre improve their handles, I think a lineup of Tre, Bilal, Cam, Kyshawn, and Alex would be interesting.
I'd like to see Sarr, Kyshawn, Coulibaly, Tre, Will Riley as the ultimate goal for the starting lineup by the end of the season.

SUPERBALLMAN wrote:WallToWall wrote:nate33 wrote:When Bilal gets back, I would like to see a starting lineup of Tre, Bilal, Middleton, Kyshawn and Sarr. There's enough ball handlers and ball movers in that group that we don't need a PG at all.
two point-forwards, and two guards that are automatic. If/when Whitmore and Tre improve their handles, I think a lineup of Tre, Bilal, Cam, Kyshawn, and Alex would be interesting.
I'd like to see Sarr, Kyshawn, Coulibaly, Tre, Will Riley as the ultimate goal for the starting lineup by the end of the season.
tontoz wrote:After the game Kyshawn was interviewed and asked about guarding Flagg. He mentioned watching film on him before the game. Didn't say how long but I suspect that a lot of players don't do that
nate33 wrote:I agree with Consiglieri. We need to dial back the talk about the tank being in jeopardy. The Wizards still aren't very good. We can't overlook that the Dallas Mavericks are a mess and are implementing a ridiculous strategy of playing Flagg at PG. A mediocre Spurs team that just barely dispatched the Pelicans in overtime routed Dallas by 33.
I didn't think we would be a 19-win disaster team like the Vegas odds suggested, but I'm also not worried about winning 30 games either. I expect Kyshawn's production to fall off a little bit once teams start bothering to scout him.