2010 wrote:
yeah, he's the one guy who's thriving. makes sense because he's the one who really wanted thibs fired.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
2010 wrote:
god shammgod wrote:it's not that you can't fire thibs. there are other good coaches out there. but it's obvious, as it always was, they had no real succession plan when they fired him. mike brown was nobody's idea of the guy who could take us to the next level and anyone saying otherwise is lying. he's just the only guy they could get.

god shammgod wrote:2010 wrote:
yeah, he's the one guy who's thriving. makes sense because he's the one who really wanted thibs fired.

Richard4444 wrote:Galvationknicks wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:the limited mitch + kat minutes were pretty good. thought they should have closed with that lineup instead of swapping mitch for kat.
Deuce was pretty awful. brunson's defense was terrible and he made too many selfish plays down the stretch (didn't pass to OG who was wide open after hitting back to back 3s from the same spot)
That was the mistake Brown did. Duece can't cover big pgs guards and JB definitely can't. So we had 3 bad defenders out there. Closing lineup against this team should've been
Mitch
Towns
OG
Bridges
Brunson
Chicago would use the Hack-a-Mitch strategy at the end of the game.
Guano wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:Guano wrote:
He had a horrendous drive then was immediately blown by on defense and that was the end of his night.
So is he brown's scapegoat? I went back to re-watch because that's not how I remembered it.
He got switched onto heurter and let him go by and fouled him. Normal play. Was nothing out of the ordnary for your 5 man in that situation.
Then he attempted a drive and missed a layup - was again a normal play.
if anything the next play got him benched, but it was just josh hart losing his man - if anything hart should be benched. guy just slipped right through and caught an easy pass for a layup. horrible defense by hart. you could argue yabs playing the 5 there should be sunk into the paint more to help on that, but his assignment at the time was smith in the corner who can shoot 3s. Brown called timeout after the play.
Idk the rotations seemed a lil fcky to me. And I doubt he is in Brown's doghouse already.
And I have a really negative view on yabu so im not doubting im being unfairly critical of yabu already. But in my defense he is fat and playing poorly out the gate.

3toheadmelo wrote:Has there ever been a time where a coach was fired after reaching the conference finals and their replacement took them to the finals the next year?
god shammgod wrote:it's not that you can't fire thibs. there are other good coaches out there. but it's obvious, as it always was, they had no real succession plan when they fired him. mike brown was nobody's idea of the guy who could take us to the next level and anyone saying otherwise is lying. he's just the only guy they could get.
3toheadmelo wrote:Has there ever been a time where a coach was fired after reaching the conference finals and their replacement took them to the finals the next year?
kNicksGmen wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Has there ever been a time where a coach was fired after reaching the conference finals and their replacement took them to the finals the next year?
Context matters. Knicks were far from inspiring last year in the playoffs and it wasn't a sustainable recipe. Results matter but so does context. Could have easily lost to the pistons - were honestly outplayed by them most of the series. Celtics smacked the crap out of the knicks in most of the games but knicks managed those 2 miracle comebacks in games 1 and 2 - not sustainable. Were big favorites against the pacers (again) and got smacked.
team was completely healthy which was a miracle of it's own.

ezmoney707 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Has there ever been a time where a coach was fired after reaching the conference finals and their replacement took them to the finals the next year?
Yes……Rick Carlisle being fired from the Pistons after making the conference finals, Larry Brown hired wins Finals the next year….

8516knicks wrote:Anyone else feel that the sense of unity, of "family," of culture, of hard-nosed playing, etc. that Thibs built with Leon the past five years is now GONE.
Not just the Coaching change but now it seems it's all every player for themeselves and THEIR salary over everything else.
It's not just Brown but add in Kat and his rep stretching from Minny to NYC and now, of all people, Josh.
It feels like were on the road to becoming the old Sacramento Kings.
3toheadmelo wrote:Has there ever been a time where a coach was fired after reaching the conference finals and their replacement took them to the finals the next year?
3toheadmelo wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Has there ever been a time where a coach was fired after reaching the conference finals and their replacement took them to the finals the next year?
Context matters. Knicks were far from inspiring last year in the playoffs and it wasn't a sustainable recipe. Results matter but so does context. Could have easily lost to the pistons - were honestly outplayed by them most of the series. Celtics smacked the crap out of the knicks in most of the games but knicks managed those 2 miracle comebacks in games 1 and 2 - not sustainable. Were big favorites against the pacers (again) and got smacked.
team was completely healthy which was a miracle of it's own.
Context matters. The Pistons were legitimately good. We absolutely deserved to win the Celtics series. The Pacers were on their way to winning the chip until Hali tore his Achilles. We were definitely contenders and this is coming from someone who wasn’t high on the team for majority of the year. Results are what matters. I don’t care about any other fan fiction.
kNicksGmen wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:kNicksGmen wrote:
Context matters. Knicks were far from inspiring last year in the playoffs and it wasn't a sustainable recipe. Results matter but so does context. Could have easily lost to the pistons - were honestly outplayed by them most of the series. Celtics smacked the crap out of the knicks in most of the games but knicks managed those 2 miracle comebacks in games 1 and 2 - not sustainable. Were big favorites against the pacers (again) and got smacked.
team was completely healthy which was a miracle of it's own.
Context matters. The Pistons were legitimately good. We absolutely deserved to win the Celtics series. The Pacers were on their way to winning the chip until Hali tore his Achilles. We were definitely contenders and this is coming from someone who wasn’t high on the team for majority of the year. Results are what matters. I don’t care about any other fan fiction.
ehhh disagree about the pistons specifically. They didn't really play well at all most of the series. Knicks were pretty awful most of the games but pulled out wins down the stretch with Kat/Brunson heroics (and game 1 Cam Payne lol).
I don't disagree the about the knicks "deserving" to win the celtics series - but that doesn't change the fact of how flukey/unlikely winning the 1st 2 games on the road was after being down 20 in both. Knicks were blown out of the building at home in game 3 and blown out on the road in game 5 (with no tatum). Sure they deserved to win, but they were not nearly as good as boston. Going into the year I always said they can beat Boston if they get luck with shooting variance or injuries - they got both (not just referring to tatum, but also the knicks being COMPLETELY HEALTHY WHICH WAS A MIRACLE).
Pacers series, outside of the 1st 3 1/2 quarters of game one they were pretty thoroughly outplayed despite Turner missing all his wide open 3s.
Pacers definitely had some special magic last year and results do matter - but like I said so does context. Nothing I said is "fan fiction". They were going to get smoked by any number of teams that came out of the west if they managed to get there. You can call that "fan fiction". OKC would have slaughtered them in 5.
