Flagg stats with or without PG.

Moderators: Dirk, HMFFL, Mavrelous

Archx wrote:Will Kidd learn anything? I'll start by saying this goes with basic logic that Flagg in AD's place could actually thrive and progress a lot faster.
Flagg stats with or without PG.

Archx wrote:Will Kidd learn anything? I'll start by saying this goes with basic logic that Flagg in AD's place could actually thrive and progress a lot faster.
Flagg stats with or without PG.
Mavrelous wrote:Archx wrote:Will Kidd learn anything? I'll start by saying this goes with basic logic that Flagg in AD's place could actually thrive and progress a lot faster.
Flagg stats with or without PG.
This entire saga seems like sabotage by Kidd, it's jusy too obvious to anyonw watvhing.
Archx wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Archx wrote:Will Kidd learn anything? I'll start by saying this goes with basic logic that Flagg in AD's place could actually thrive and progress a lot faster.
Flagg stats with or without PG.
This entire saga seems like sabotage by Kidd, it's jusy too obvious to anyonw watvhing.
Yeah this team is still trying compete and it will for sure hurt his ROY campaign a lot. So, it's just weird..... If there was no AD or Kyrie and Mavs wouldn't care about the standings, then probably no one would even care what Kidd is doing with him.
But at the end of the day, we have to ask ourselves, is it really productive to keep forcing this? Specially when you see such drastic differences.
Bob8 wrote:Archx wrote:Mavrelous wrote:This entire saga seems like sabotage by Kidd, it's jusy too obvious to anyonw watvhing.
Yeah this team is still trying compete and it will for sure hurt his ROY campaign a lot. So, it's just weird..... If there was no AD or Kyrie and Mavs wouldn't care about the standings, then probably no one would even care what Kidd is doing with him.
But at the end of the day, we have to ask ourselves, is it really productive to keep forcing this? Specially when you see such drastic differences.
There's another possibility, Nico wants Flagg to play Pg, to show how Mavs don't need Luka.
Archx wrote:Bob8 wrote:Archx wrote:
Yeah this team is still trying compete and it will for sure hurt his ROY campaign a lot. So, it's just weird..... If there was no AD or Kyrie and Mavs wouldn't care about the standings, then probably no one would even care what Kidd is doing with him.
But at the end of the day, we have to ask ourselves, is it really productive to keep forcing this? Specially when you see such drastic differences.
There's another possibility, Nico wants Flagg to play Pg, to show how Mavs don't need Luka.
I wouldn't go that far. Not everything is connected to him.I think they're actually trying to develop his playmaking ability but in the wrong way.

Memphis to me is trending a rebuilding soon if they don't figure something out. The next two off-seasons are key for them.Super Cooper wrote:IMO, Ja is definitely going to be moved. They have JJJ as their cornerstone. It'd be interesting how they value AD, who's a perfect C for JJJ. If MEM isn't interested, I think MIA would be a good 3rd team, with AD going to MIA, Ja to DAL, and Herro + picks/pieces to MEM.
HMFFL wrote:Max Christie needs to replace DLo in field goal attempts. Give Christie the 11.3 DLo averages. Cooper will benefit from a more stable guard.
41Dirk41 wrote:2 guys over 30% from 3s (and one of them is Hardy). That's not possible in this NBA.

Mavrelous wrote:DLo and Christie should be the backcourt, BWill and Hardy back them up until Kyrie and Exum are back.
Klay and Gafford should be shopped hard, AD should play 90% at the 5, Gafford no longer needed, Klay is washed and frustrated with hos role, send him somewhere else.
Copper and PJ should be the forward with Naji and Martin backing them up.
Mavrelous wrote:DLo and Christie should be the backcourt, BWill and Hardy back them up until Kyrie and Exum are back.
Klay and Gafford should be shopped hard, AD should play 90% at the 5, Gafford no longer needed, Klay is washed and frustrated with hos role, send him somewhere else.
Copper and PJ should be the forward with Naji and Martin backing them up.
Archx wrote:Mavrelous wrote:DLo and Christie should be the backcourt, BWill and Hardy back them up until Kyrie and Exum are back.
Klay and Gafford should be shopped hard, AD should play 90% at the 5, Gafford no longer needed, Klay is washed and frustrated with hos role, send him somewhere else.
Copper and PJ should be the forward with Naji and Martin backing them up.
This is what a common logic dictates and a lot of what you wrote i expected Nico to do in the off season already. Gafford should have been sold at a high price long ago and Christie has taken a step forward.
would like AD to start at 5, Coop 4 and PJ at 3. Because i do believe PJ is badly needed with the 1st unit. Lively, Klay and Coop combination in the starting 5 just doesn't work.
Bob8 wrote:Mavrelous wrote:DLo and Christie should be the backcourt, BWill and Hardy back them up until Kyrie and Exum are back.
Klay and Gafford should be shopped hard, AD should play 90% at the 5, Gafford no longer needed, Klay is washed and frustrated with hos role, send him somewhere else.
Copper and PJ should be the forward with Naji and Martin backing them up.
Gafford should be traded, but question is how many games will AD and Lively play?

41Dirk41 wrote:We need Jrue, if he is available without FRP i'm all in with him.
Mavrelous wrote:Klay is negative value coupled with Gafford together he mau fetch something marginally positive.