Rdude22 wrote:_NoMas wrote:Rdude22 wrote:
You're right! I see he's averaged his 30+/6/5 the past 4-5 games without playing a single minute in any of the 4th quarters lol
Pretty f'ing amazing and now i'm thinking it's somewhat intentional
It does help that he’s on a team that takes an 8 point lead entering the 4th and then goes on a 23-6 run without their MVP. No other MVP candidate has that luxury lol
Those are the breaks lol. Tho, you still give him credit for putting them up 8 to begin with and closing out the close games (HOU and IND).
But honestly, when a team wins 72, 73, 69, etc games... they're probably still a low/mid-50s win team even without their best player. Doesn't mean that player isn't still the mvp, but then it goes back to what is the lens that we're basing most valuable on.
If player A and player B both have the same win-shares and plus/minus for their respective teams (and whatever other comparable metrics), but player A's team wins 50 and player B's team wins 70... i personally don't diminish player B's impact or candidacy just bc his team has a higher floor. To me they're essentially the same in impact, so then narrative-wise i may favor the player B and his 70-win team bc winning is the #1 marketing tool of sports.... unless there is some incredible narrative in player A's 50-win team that can't be ignored.
Yep agreed it can get very subjective. But ultimately if that’s a 70+ win team, it’s gonna be v hard for it to be anyone but SGA, unless the Lakers, Bucks, Nuggets or Spurs get to around 60 wins.



















