NFC East

Moderator: bwgood77

Who will win the division next season?

Commanders
3
25%
Cowboys
3
25%
Eagles
6
50%
Giants
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
QB_Eagles
Analyst
Posts: 3,104
And1: 1,118
Joined: Jul 24, 2023
     

Re: NFC East 

Post#3441 » by QB_Eagles » Sun Nov 2, 2025 10:48 pm

Jaydubb wrote:Go Dodgers!

Image

Great win for us lifelong Dodgers fans !!! :beer:
bluejerseyjinx wrote:I'm done taking it up the butt with no lube.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3442 » by Jaydubb » Sun Nov 2, 2025 10:56 pm

QB_Eagles wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:Go Dodgers!

Image

Great win for us lifelong Dodgers fans !!! :beer:

Image
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,433
And1: 5,417
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: NFC East 

Post#3443 » by Mr B » Mon Nov 3, 2025 1:23 am

I didn’t even know baseball was still on. Lol
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3444 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 3, 2025 1:54 am

Mr B wrote:I didn’t even know baseball was still on. Lol

For most people it ended like a month ago
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,433
And1: 5,417
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: NFC East 

Post#3445 » by Mr B » Sun Nov 9, 2025 2:53 am

Donovan Ezeiruaku has been one of the few bright spots for the Cowboys this year. He stacks up well against Abdul Carter.

Image
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 54,959
And1: 22,077
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: NFC East 

Post#3446 » by El Turco » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:43 pm

Mr B wrote:Donovan Ezeiruaku has been one of the few bright spots for the Cowboys this year. He stacks up well against Abdul Carter.

Image


Ezeiruaku was a beast at BC. I was puzzled when he fell out of the first round.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3447 » by Jaydubb » Sun Nov 9, 2025 3:31 pm

The cowboys are reportedly so scared of the eagles that supposedly part of the trade to Green Bay, Green Bay had to agree to not trade Micah parsons to the eagles in the future. Wow!

Eagles always living rent free in the cowboys heads.

Every cowboy and cowboy fan when thinking about the eagles

Image
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,433
And1: 5,417
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: NFC East 

Post#3448 » by Mr B » Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:51 am

Jaydubb wrote:The cowboys are reportedly so scared of the eagles that supposedly part of the trade to Green Bay, Green Bay had to agree to not trade Micah parsons to the eagles in the future. Wow!

Eagles always living rent free in the cowboys heads.

Every cowboy and cowboy fan when thinking about the eagles

Image

On second thought, the Packers should go ahead and trade Micah to the Eagles.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=3KaI_3QT7XTTm5N8gt4yQg
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,242
And1: 246
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3449 » by Mariner » Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:45 am

Jaydubb wrote:The cowboys are reportedly so scared of the eagles that supposedly part of the trade to Green Bay, Green Bay had to agree to not trade Micah parsons to the eagles in the future. Wow!

Eagles always living rent free in the cowboys heads.

Every cowboy and cowboy fan when thinking about the eagles

Image

The packers put in a similar clause about Clark being traded to their division.
Routine stuff.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3450 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:37 pm

Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:The cowboys are reportedly so scared of the eagles that supposedly part of the trade to Green Bay, Green Bay had to agree to not trade Micah parsons to the eagles in the future. Wow!

Eagles always living rent free in the cowboys heads.

Every cowboy and cowboy fan when thinking about the eagles

Image

The packers put in a similar clause about Clark being traded to their division.
Routine stuff.

It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,242
And1: 246
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3451 » by Mariner » Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:21 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:The cowboys are reportedly so scared of the eagles that supposedly part of the trade to Green Bay, Green Bay had to agree to not trade Micah parsons to the eagles in the future. Wow!

Eagles always living rent free in the cowboys heads.

Every cowboy and cowboy fan when thinking about the eagles

Image

The packers put in a similar clause about Clark being traded to their division.
Routine stuff.

It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.

The other team in the trade put in a similar clause.
They got the idea from similar trades that had been done.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,433
And1: 5,417
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: NFC East 

Post#3452 » by Mr B » Mon Nov 10, 2025 2:29 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:The cowboys are reportedly so scared of the eagles that supposedly part of the trade to Green Bay, Green Bay had to agree to not trade Micah parsons to the eagles in the future. Wow!

Eagles always living rent free in the cowboys heads.

Every cowboy and cowboy fan when thinking about the eagles

Image

The packers put in a similar clause about Clark being traded to their division.
Routine stuff.

It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.

I say let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and give the Cowboys that 3rd FRP. Then use two of those picks to go get Crosby. The DL would be set then.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3453 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:09 pm

Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Mariner wrote:The packers put in a similar clause about Clark being traded to their division.
Routine stuff.

It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.

The other team in the trade put in a similar clause.
They got the idea from similar trades that had been done.

Regardless of how hard you’re desperately trying to make this look normal, this is something that doesn’t happen very often.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

NFC East 

Post#3454 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:13 pm

Mr B wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Mariner wrote:The packers put in a similar clause about Clark being traded to their division.
Routine stuff.

It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.

I say let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and give the Cowboys that 3rd FRP. Then use two of those picks to go get Crosby. The DL would be set then.


Of course that would be a good scenario for you but that’s the whole point. They make it so good that Green Bay won’t want to do it.

In a hypothetical trade, Green Bay would either have to take 1 less first round pick for trading Micah or a nfc east team would have to overpay 1 extra first round pick to acquire parsons. Neither of those scenarios are happening.
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,242
And1: 246
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3455 » by Mariner » Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:25 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.

The other team in the trade put in a similar clause.
They got the idea from similar trades that had been done.

Regardless of how hard you’re desperately trying to make this look normal, this is something that doesn’t happen very often.

There’s no desperation. lol
Both teams did it.
And by any chance you are right then I guess that would make the cowboys geniuses.
Mr B
RealGM
Posts: 18,433
And1: 5,417
Joined: Nov 20, 2014
         

Re: NFC East 

Post#3456 » by Mr B » Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:38 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:It’s so routine that it barely ever happens.

I say let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and give the Cowboys that 3rd FRP. Then use two of those picks to go get Crosby. The DL would be set then.


Of course that would be a good scenario for you but that’s the whole point. They make it so good that Green Bay won’t want to do it.

In a hypothetical trade, Green Bay would either have to take 1 less first round pick for trading Micah or a nfc east team would have to overpay 1 extra first round pick to acquire parsons. Neither of those scenarios are happening.

I say, let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and both the Eagles and the Packers have to give Dallas a FRP each. Who says no?
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3457 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:48 pm

Mr B wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Mr B wrote:I say let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and give the Cowboys that 3rd FRP. Then use two of those picks to go get Crosby. The DL would be set then.


Of course that would be a good scenario for you but that’s the whole point. They make it so good that Green Bay won’t want to do it.

In a hypothetical trade, Green Bay would either have to take 1 less first round pick for trading Micah or a nfc east team would have to overpay 1 extra first round pick to acquire parsons. Neither of those scenarios are happening.

I say, let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and both the Eagles and the Packers have to give Dallas a FRP each. Who says no?

The eagles and packers both say no.

Again, the point of adding it is so that a trade never happens. The cowboys did not add that hoping that they would get extra first round picks because only an idiot would think that’s a logical scenario that might actually happen. They added that so the eagles will never get parsons, at least not while parsons is still in his prime. It shows how scared the cowboys are of the eagles.

The packers then added the same clause for Clark to pretend like it was a normal thing but let’s be real, the packers wouldn’t be scared to play Clark twice per year..lol the whole reason that is added is for parsons, and the packers are like ok well let’s just add that for Clark too then..
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3458 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:50 pm

Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Mariner wrote:The other team in the trade put in a similar clause.
They got the idea from similar trades that had been done.

Regardless of how hard you’re desperately trying to make this look normal, this is something that doesn’t happen very often.

There’s no desperation. lol
Both teams did it.
And by any chance you are right then I guess that would make the cowboys geniuses.

Yeah the cowboys added that for parsons and the packers added it too for Clark, but the packers wouldn’t be scared to play Clark twice per year..lmao They basically added it because they are like ok well”ok if you are gonna add that for parsons then we will add that for Clark too”.
Mariner
Rookie
Posts: 1,242
And1: 246
Joined: Jul 21, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3459 » by Mariner » Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:52 pm

Jaydubb wrote:
Mr B wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Of course that would be a good scenario for you but that’s the whole point. They make it so good that Green Bay won’t want to do it.

In a hypothetical trade, Green Bay would either have to take 1 less first round pick for trading Micah or a nfc east team would have to overpay 1 extra first round pick to acquire parsons. Neither of those scenarios are happening.

I say, let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and both the Eagles and the Packers have to give Dallas a FRP each. Who says no?

The eagles and packers both say no.

Again, the point of adding it is so that a trade never happens. The cowboys did not add that hoping that they would get extra first round picks because only an idiot would think that’s a logical scenario that might actually happen. They added that so the eagles will never get parsons, at least not while parsons is still in his prime. It shows how scared the cowboys are of the eagles.

The packers then added the same clause for Clark to pretend like it was a normal thing but let’s be real, the packers wouldn’t be scared to play Clark twice per year..lol the whole reason that is added is for parsons, and the packers are like ok well let’s just add that for Clark too then..

How are you so sure it was the cowboys idea? The packers did this before with Favre.
Also the clause is about the NFC east. Same goes for the giants and Commanders.
Jaydubb
Veteran
Posts: 2,891
And1: 1,037
Joined: Aug 15, 2023

Re: NFC East 

Post#3460 » by Jaydubb » Mon Nov 10, 2025 4:55 pm

Mariner wrote:
Jaydubb wrote:
Mr B wrote:I say, let the Packers trade Micah to the Eagles and both the Eagles and the Packers have to give Dallas a FRP each. Who says no?

The eagles and packers both say no.

Again, the point of adding it is so that a trade never happens. The cowboys did not add that hoping that they would get extra first round picks because only an idiot would think that’s a logical scenario that might actually happen. They added that so the eagles will never get parsons, at least not while parsons is still in his prime. It shows how scared the cowboys are of the eagles.

The packers then added the same clause for Clark to pretend like it was a normal thing but let’s be real, the packers wouldn’t be scared to play Clark twice per year..lol the whole reason that is added is for parsons, and the packers are like ok well let’s just add that for Clark too then..

How are you so sure it was the cowboys idea? The packers did this before with Favre.
Also the clause is about the NFC east. Same goes for the giants and Commanders.

Brett favre? Lmao that was like 20 years ago dude.

Oh yeah the giants and commanders are also a real threat to the cowboys right now…

Return to The General NFL Board