AFM wrote:Deni….. AVDIJA!!!!!
Appreciate the bump on the thread. I feel if I had done it - it would have been perceived as negative
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
AFM wrote:Deni….. AVDIJA!!!!!
doclinkin wrote:Oh no you’re right. There’s no hierarchy of nerddom on an obscure message board of a losing team. I just wrote 20 paragraphs in response to trolling. Not like you can call me reasonable. Troll away. Whatever keeps you from blowing up post offices or whatever.
lastemp3ror wrote:doclinkin wrote:
Grow our own.
The aim is to draft top talent to an organization prepared to develop them.
Deni was our own, and if the aim is to draft and develop prospects, then that is more of an accusation against our front office, because it implies that they couldn't develop him. No? I think you even said it in another post above, that Deni needed to move on, because we cannot develop him.
bsilver wrote:doclinkin wrote:Oh no you’re right. There’s no hierarchy of nerddom on an obscure message board of a losing team. I just wrote 20 paragraphs in response to trolling. Not like you can call me reasonable. Troll away. Whatever keeps you from blowing up post offices or whatever.
Why are we Deni fans so intent on keeping this thread alive?
A lot of it is that we don't like the inflammatory language which amounts to personal insults. Terms like "unbelievably whiny" and "weeps and tears their shirt", and worse, don't help.
I enjoy watching the Trailblazers games and keeping up with Deni's career. I'm still a Wizards fan, but the games are hardly watchable. The trade took away much of our reasons to watch the Wizards games. We deserve to watch a competitive team.
bsilver wrote:doclinkin wrote:Oh no you’re right. There’s no hierarchy of nerddom on an obscure message board of a losing team. I just wrote 20 paragraphs in response to trolling. Not like you can call me reasonable. Troll away. Whatever keeps you from blowing up post offices or whatever.
Why are we Deni fans so intent on keeping this thread alive?
A lot of it is that we don't like the inflammatory language which amounts to personal insults. Terms like "unbelievably whiny" and "weeps and tears their shirt", and worse, don't help.
I enjoy watching the Trailblazers games and keeping up with Deni's career. I'm still a Wizards fan, but the games are hardly watchable. The trade took away much of our reasons to watch the Wizards games. We deserve to watch a competitive team.
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Part of me believes they didn't want a guy from the old regime to outshine their guys, hence why they made a trade that was hasty.... more like a insecure, knee jerk thing that they thought they could brush under the rug....
doclinkin wrote:I dunno. My contention is if the Unibomber had message boards to fuss on he wouldn’t have had to blow up universities to get his message across. Was it Bayard Rustin who said violence is the language of the unheard? Who knows how much malfeasance would be caused by frustrated Wiz fans if they didn’t have a place to hoot and fumigate.

payitforward wrote:CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Part of me believes they didn't want a guy from the old regime to outshine their guys, hence why they made a trade that was hasty.... more like a insecure, knee jerk thing that they thought they could brush under the rug....
I don't know you, of course, or what you do for a living, but the idea of anyone on this board making a judgment of the kind you are making about experienced professional businessmen like Winger & Dawkins strikes me as truly off the wall.
payitforward wrote:Good for you for painting the kids' rooms!
As I wrote earlier, this thread has gotten overheated. Got to me as well.
Maybe the mods should lock this thread for a year, then open it again for a while, then lock it for a while, then open it for a while when we get that 2d R1 pick?

AFM wrote:Deni….. AVDIJA!!!!!
doclinkin wrote:lastemp3ror wrote:doclinkin wrote:Here it looks like there’s a clear plan.
What is the plan? I think the plan would include getting a player like Deni on our team. Now we are hoping to draft for one or trade for one.
Draft a better one. Grow our own.
The aim is to draft top talent to an organization prepared to develop them. Kyshawn and Sarr show promise in this regard. Bilal hasn’t yet taken a jump though the talent is there.
Folks gloss over Deni’s iffy early returns, though fans pine for him because he did grow and break out. Took him 4 years to do so, after he signed a contract extension. We haven’t had even their first draft pick that long.
We are in talent accumulation phase. The mission has been to draft multiple talents as good or better than Deni. Last years top draft had 2-3. This year has 2-3. The aim is championship contention. We need a franchise player. Is Deni that guy? Is he your #1 option on a winning team. A superstar. If not then we can’t afford to pass up every chance at landing that guy.
doclinkin wrote:lastemp3ror wrote:doclinkin wrote:
Grow our own.
The aim is to draft top talent to an organization prepared to develop them.
Fans are just impatient. We haven’t been through a true rebuild before. An intentional one anyway. In the past ownership has pressed the GM to hurry up and make something happen. Personally I’m comfortable letting it play out. Because the plan requires that we lose until we are out from under the axe of a lost draft pick.
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Well it's convenient that you cut out the part where I clearly say I really don't know at the end of the day and that's just how it kind of read to me.payitforward wrote:CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Part of me believes they didn't want a guy from the old regime to outshine their guys, hence why they made a trade that was hasty.... more like a insecure, knee jerk thing that they thought they could brush under the rug....
I don't know you, of course, or what you do for a living, but the idea of anyone on this board making a judgment of the kind you are making about experienced professional businessmen like Winger & Dawkins strikes me as truly off the wall.
And what the hell is this pompous air you have about yourself, talking about what I may or may not do for a living, as it relates to this discussion? You now tried to insinuate the Dawkins is somehow immune to any critique because of title and status. I guess by that line of reasoning, Jeffrey Epstein would be immune to any of anyone's criticism because he was a well to do business man.
Off the wall is you and doclinkin continuing to embarrass yourselves with ad hominem attacks.
CntOutSmrtCrazy wrote:Real question, why would you want to suppress speech in a space your attendance is completely optional?payitforward wrote:Good for you for painting the kids' rooms!
As I wrote earlier, this thread has gotten overheated. Got to me as well.
Maybe the mods should lock this thread for a year, then open it again for a while, then lock it for a while, then open it for a while when we get that 2d R1 pick?