3ammy3uck3ts wrote:Tim_Hardawayy wrote:3ammy3uck3ts wrote: he’s been here for 7 years now and has been defended like he’s Michael Jordan majority of his tenure
This is so disingenuous and I don't know why you do this. Saying he's not trash is defending him like he's Michael Jordan?
Stop it Timmy, that’s not how those conversations go and it’s far more extreme than “he’s not trash”. I don’t think he’s trash, he’s just not the elite of the elite like many pretend and if he is, it’s time he starts proving it and proving it in the playoffs where it matters most. Any criticism or comparison of Herro and there’s 6-7 posters coming at you with pitch forks. On top of that the second we lose or the other team goes on a 8-0 run or something here comes the “oh yeah we really don’t need Herro do we guys” posts from a few of them, then we end up pulling out the W like last night. I just want him to back up the nonsense that comes with it all
You don't get to use hyperbole and then when others do it back to you say "what are you talking about???" That's disingenuous.
OK I'll be more exact in my wording, how is claiming Herro isn't completely expendable, played like an all-star last season, was a net positive all year long, and might be able to provide something to this team, "defending him like he's Michael Jordan"? You're poking people in the eye and then getting mad when they respond, is what you're doing.
The reasonable criticism is that he's a flawed player who holds the team back defensively, might cost too much to keep, and might not be worth investing in long term. I haven't seen a single poster dispute those points, even the ones you claim are "stans". What actually happens is people (mostly yourself along with a few others to lesser degree) address him in a way like he's actively sabotaging the team or holding it back. Which I don't agree with at all, and there's very little evidence for it. There's plenty of evidence for his flaws as a player, but he's not like this black sheep we need to discard.
EDIT: This all depends on money of course. At a certain price tag he will be untenable. But I disagree with any poster who thinks at his current 30 million, or maybe up to 40, that he can't be a positive value asset, which is all you can really ask for in the modern NBA, where most players making more than the minimum are negative value (yeah the entire salary cap system is broken but that's a whole other discussion).











